- #1
Antonius
- 49
- 0
My question is, why it's 1/2 [qiVi]? Shouldn't it just be qiVi?
Thank you ...
Oh I see,robphy said:You want to count "pairs"...
That is, if you include both [itex]\frac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{q_2q_1}{r_{21}}[/itex], you are counting the same "pair" twice.
The factor of (1/2) is a result of the mathematical derivation of electric potential energy. It is derived from the work done in moving a test charge from infinity to a specific distance away from a point charge or a collection of charges.
Yes, the factor of (1/2) is necessary as it accurately represents the work done in moving a test charge from infinity to a specific distance away from a point charge or a collection of charges. Without this factor, the formula would not accurately reflect the concept of electric potential energy.
The factor of (1/2) does not have a significant effect on the overall value of electric potential energy. It is simply a coefficient that is used in the formula to accurately calculate the work done in moving a test charge.
No, the factor of (1/2) is specific to electric potential energy and cannot be applied to other forms of potential energy. Each type of potential energy has its own unique formula and coefficients.
The letter U is often used to represent electric potential energy to avoid confusion with voltage, which is represented by the letter V. This helps to differentiate between the two concepts and prevent errors in calculations.