Why is there no "mid-Atlantic ridge" on other planets?

  • I
  • Thread starter Edward Barrow
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Planets
In summary, the planet has scars going all the way around it. The most famous of these is the mid-atlantic ridge.
  • #1
Edward Barrow
25
1
Our planet has scars going all the way around it. The most famous of these is the mid-atlantic ridge.

continentalshelf.jpg


How come Earth is unique in this respect? There are none on Mars for example:

mola_cylin.jpg


How come we don't see any such feature on Mercury, Venus or Mars?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #3
Comeback City said:
It seems as if Earth is the only planet in our solar system that has tectonic plates. Here is some info I found.

http://www.wwnorton.com/college/geo/egeo2/content/ch02/article_2.htm

Interesting. According to that article:

"Indeed, the pattern of faults on Venus suggests that plate-tectonics-like movement struggled to begin but never quite succeeded."

So it looks like Venus failed to do what Earth did do. I wonder could the fact Earth has an atmosphere while the other planets don't help explain why Earth got its tectonic plates going while the other planets didn't.
 
  • #5
Edward Barrow said:
Interesting. According to that article:

"Indeed, the pattern of faults on Venus suggests that plate-tectonics-like movement struggled to begin but never quite succeeded."

So it looks like Venus failed to do what Earth did do. I wonder could the fact Earth has an atmosphere while the other planets don't help explain why Earth got its tectonic plates going while the other planets didn't.
That would be a tough correlation to make. How would you attempt to explain it?
Also, the article states,
"Because Earth's interior has remained warm enough for flow to take place in its mantle."
I'm guessing this is a big factor.
 
  • #6
1oldman2 said:
It all comes down to "Plate tectonics" a feature that until recently only Earth was believed to possess. http://wsm.wsu.edu/discovery/index.php/2011/04/plate-tectonics-key-to-life-on-earth/
More recently Mars was found to have P. T. While not a ridge "Valles Marineris" is believed to be a product of Martian plate tectonics.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla-scientist-discovers-plate-237303
The second article talks about how Mars is in a primitive stage of plate tectonics. Could it possibly be a later stage considering the large, dormant volcanoes such as Olympus Mons that could have formed a long time ago due to the plate tectonics?
 
  • #7
Comeback City said:
The second article talks about how Mars is in a primitive stage of plate tectonics. Could it possibly be a later stage considering the large, dormant volcanoes such as Olympus Mons that could have formed a long time ago due to the plate tectonics?

Recent research has shown there are large oceans of water underneath the surface of the Earth. If these were on Mars, and Mars' atmosphere was stripped away, thus reducing atmospheric pressure and thus reducing the boiling point of water to 10c (which is what it is on Mars), the water underneath the surface of the Earth on Mars would boil into gas, expand and burst out in those volcanoes you see on Mars' surface?
 
  • #8
Edward Barrow said:
Recent research has shown there are large oceans of water underneath the surface of the Earth. If these were on Mars, and Mars' atmosphere was stripped away, thus reducing atmospheric pressure and thus reducing the boiling point of water to 10c (which is what it is on Mars), the water underneath the surface of the Earth on Mars would boil into gas, expand and burst out in those volcanoes you see on Mars' surface?
These volcanoes are dormant, though. Unless you have a source to prove otherwise?
 
  • #9
Comeback City said:
The second article talks about how Mars is in a primitive stage of plate tectonics. Could it possibly be a later stage considering the large, dormant volcanoes such as Olympus Mons that could have formed a long time ago due to the plate tectonics?
I do believe I have read that one of the reasons Mars lacks a significant magnetic field is the core has cooled, (I'll see what I can find to cite that) at any rate this would definitely have an effect on plate tectonics, not so much primitive as extinct or severely reduced. It seems Yin from the UCLA site would be a good person to check with concerning the Martian Geology, I'll see what I can find there also.
 
  • Like
Likes Edward Barrow
  • #10
Comeback City said:
These volcanoes are dormant, though. Unless you have a source to prove otherwise?

I'm theorizing that the gas has been ejected at this stage.

Those volcanoes look like zits on a persons face. Almost like they were formed quickly. They look unusually tall.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #11
Comeback City said:
These volcanoes are dormant, though. Unless you have a source to prove otherwise?
This article implies that Volcanic activity is very likely not dead on Mars.
https://www.volcanodiscovery.com/mars/olympus-mons/evidence-of-recent-volcanic-activity.html
Also the opinion seems to be that plate tectonics is no longer active although the core is believed to be liquid
From, https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1999/ast29apr99_1/
"The discovery of this pattern on Mars could revolutionize current thinking of the red planet's evolution," said Dr. Jack Connerney of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, an investigator on the Global Surveyor's magnetometer team. "If the bands on Mars are an imprint of crustal spreading, they are a relic of an early era of plate tectonics on Mars. However, unlike on Earth, the implied plate tectonic activity on Mars is most likely extinct."
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #12
1oldman2 said:
This article implies that Volcanic activity is very likely not dead on Mars.
Dormant, not dead. It might take a while to prove it is active though.

Also, do we know how old these meteorites are? If not, they could've been there with the penguins for hundreds of millions of years, and we wouldn't have known. It certainly does prove, though, that there was once volcanic activity on Mars.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #13
I guess plate tectonics of Earth exist because the interior of Earth is still to some extent fluid not so far under the surface.
Why that seems not to be so for Venus is an interesting question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #14
Our Moon has noticeable tidal effects on the oceans and I wonder whether PT could have been enabled by the presence of such a large Moon disturbing theEarth's surface. Venus has nothing significant and the two martian moons are pretty small. As with most planetary features, you need a particular set of circumstances for them to occur. Mass, constituents, age and temperature probably need to be 'just right' to get PT.
We cannot tell what's happening at the internal solid cores of the Gas Giants.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Edward Barrow said:
How come Earth is unique in this respect?

How come we don't see any such feature on Mercury, Venus or Mars?

In a lecture on the DVDs of the series "The Great Courses: Oceanography" , the presenter said that oceans are necessary for plate tectonics to work. (As to why they are necessarily, there might be several reasons. I'd have to re-watch the DVD to recount them.)
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #16
Stephen Tashi said:
"The Great Courses: Oceanography" , the presenter said that oceans are necessary for plate tectonics to work. (As to why they are necessarily, there might be several reasons.

Its my understanding that rocks exposed to water (oceans?) change chemically (weathering?) and which alters their density (lighter I think).
This could accentuate density differences between the crust and mantle. Which is probably close to a tectonic driving mechanism.

This chemically altered material eventually subsides into the mantle. Altered material may come up more frequently than unaltered material. Some will instead mix with the body of mantle, changing it to some degree chemically. This might also affect things.

This of course could happen along with everything else discussed.
 

Related to Why is there no "mid-Atlantic ridge" on other planets?

1. Why is there no "mid-Atlantic ridge" on other planets?

The mid-Atlantic ridge is a geological feature that runs through the Atlantic Ocean, dividing it into two halves. It is a result of the movement of tectonic plates on Earth. Other planets, such as Mars and Venus, do not have tectonic plates like Earth does, and therefore do not have a mid-Atlantic ridge.

2. Can other planets have a similar feature to the mid-Atlantic ridge?

While other planets may not have a mid-Atlantic ridge specifically, they can have similar geological features caused by tectonic activity. For example, Mars has the Tharsis Ridge, which is a large volcanic plateau caused by movement of the planet's crust.

3. How does the mid-Atlantic ridge contribute to Earth's geology?

The mid-Atlantic ridge is constantly pushing apart the tectonic plates on either side of it, which creates new oceanic crust and contributes to the formation of new landmasses. This process, known as seafloor spreading, also helps to recycle old oceanic crust back into the Earth's mantle.

4. Are there any other features on Earth similar to the mid-Atlantic ridge?

Yes, there are other mid-ocean ridges found in other oceans, such as the East Pacific Rise and the Mid-Indian Ridge. These ridges are also caused by tectonic plate movement and play a similar role in Earth's geology.

5. Could other planets with tectonic activity develop a mid-Atlantic ridge in the future?

It is possible for other planets with tectonic activity to develop a mid-Atlantic ridge-like feature in the future. However, this would depend on various factors such as the planet's size, composition, and tectonic activity. It is also important to note that the mid-Atlantic ridge took millions of years to form on Earth, so it would likely not be a quick process on other planets either.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
378
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top