- #1
fairtrax
- 3
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- I don't get it, why can we be sure, that black holes evaporate
Summary: I don't get it, why can we be sure, that black holes evaporate
My simplified imagination about Hawking radiation is that when the vacuum fluctuation creates a matter-antimatter particles pair at the event horizon, thay are ripped appart by the tidal force and do not manage to split and anihilate as usual.
It's clear, it can happen, that one particle flies away, the other falls into the hole. But why does always fly away the matter-particle, and the antimatter one falls into the hole to anihilate there with one particle inside and decrease the total mass of black hole? Should that be not statistically 1:1 also for the cases, when antimatter is radiated by the black hole and a matter particle falls into the hole? I do not understand the point, why black holes is evaporating and always devours the antimatter from these pairs.
My simplified imagination about Hawking radiation is that when the vacuum fluctuation creates a matter-antimatter particles pair at the event horizon, thay are ripped appart by the tidal force and do not manage to split and anihilate as usual.
It's clear, it can happen, that one particle flies away, the other falls into the hole. But why does always fly away the matter-particle, and the antimatter one falls into the hole to anihilate there with one particle inside and decrease the total mass of black hole? Should that be not statistically 1:1 also for the cases, when antimatter is radiated by the black hole and a matter particle falls into the hole? I do not understand the point, why black holes is evaporating and always devours the antimatter from these pairs.