Which variable(s) are adjusted for artillery targeting?

  • Thread starter Negatron
  • Start date
In summary, during the WW2 era, prior to the development of computers, the common method for achieving optimal distance for artillery fire was through a combination of adjusting the angle of the barrel and the amount of propellant used. This could be seen in the use of 16-inch guns on ships such as the USS Iowa and Missouri, which used charts to determine range based on projectile weight, elevation angle, and number of silk power bags. The maximum range for these guns was around 41,622 yards with a nominal powder charge of 660 lbs. For smaller ground artillery, the amount of powder was commonly fixed inside a metal casing and the angle of the barrel was used to alter distance. However, advancements in tank warfare technology during the first
  • #1
Negatron
73
0
I'm more interested in a historical perspective prior to computers being able to solve for optimal results, somewhere in the WW2 era.

Was the common thing then to adjust angle or the amount of charge to get some desired distance? Or was it commonly a combination of both?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Read about the USS Iowa and Missouri 16-inch guns at

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/weaps/mk-7.htm

They had charts of range for projectile weight, elevation angle, and number of silk power bags.

the maximum range was about 41,622 yards (38.059 km or 20.55 nm) with nominal 660 lb (300 kg) powder charge. See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16"/50_caliber_Mark_7_gun

The maximum flight time was nearly 1 1/2 minutes. Most targets could be reached with an elevation angle either under or over 45 degrees. (Nearly?) all projectiles were fired at under 45 degrees elevation. This minimized flight time.

Bob S
 
  • #3
Was adjusting the amount of propellant also common for smaller ground artillery? My assumption was that the amount of powder is commonly fixed inside a metal casing and angle is used to alter distance.
 
  • #4
Negatron said:
Was adjusting the amount of propellant also common for smaller ground artillery? My assumption was that the amount of powder is commonly fixed inside a metal casing and angle is used to alter distance.

You're right - most artillery pieces in WWII used shells with a fixed charge, so range was established by varying the angle of the barrel. I think you could vary the charge used on a mortar, however.
 
  • #5
Tank warfare techonology in the USA took a huge leap that was first demonstrated during the first Iraqi war, "Desert Storm". Until then tank warfare relied on the inaccuracy of the cannons used in tanks. However, the USA had developed the technology to a point it was essentially "one shot, one kill", which obvious the Iraqi's weren't prepared for and the early tank battles were a slaughter until Iraqi figured out it could no longer engage in tank warfare.

Back in WWII days, women were generating partial tables of data for motar rounds, and the earliest computers were being used to do the interpolation to fill those tables. The technology at the time wasn't able to take out the German bunkers that resulted in such a high casualty rate during the D-Day beach assault. Apparently the bombs that aircraft could carry weren't strong enough to destroy the bunkers, so they tried to take them out with ship cannons.
 
  • #6
Bob's answer misses an important point. If you have a long flight distance, a fast rate of fire and can change your elevation quickly, you can fire two rounds that impact the target at the same time. This is called "time on target" by the people who do this for a living.
 
  • #7
This may help you
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/6-40/Ch7.htm
They’re many variables in powder. Some powder is called “green bag” some “white bag”
With different amounts of green or white you can adjust for the range of the shell.
The temperature of the powder is also considered.
The fire direction center used small sticks that looked like slide rules that were used to make quick manual calculations. These were called Graphical Firing Tables.
The elevation of the barrel combined with the right powder is used to get the desired range. There many more variables than powder and elevation. Things like wind speed wind direction, air density even the earth’s rotation are all part of calculating it manually.
Small artillery like 105 mm use a brass shell casing but large artillery like 155 mm and bigger use a projectile and powder put in the breach and closed.
 
  • #8
Interesting, it seems like mostly tabular data and interpolation rather than elegant mathematics. I've noticed from equations with Newton drag that elevations would typically be kept quite low and only increase dramatically close to the maximum range of the weapon, where the travel time also increases dramatically. The high-school kinematics idea of 45 degree optimal angles isn't very useful and often quite wrong for achieving maximum distance.
 
  • #9
It is best to keep the projectile as close to the ground as possible because the enemy has radar that can send there projectile back to the same point yours was fired from. This is called counter battery fire.
 
Last edited:

Related to Which variable(s) are adjusted for artillery targeting?

1. What is the purpose of adjusting for variables in artillery targeting?

The purpose of adjusting for variables in artillery targeting is to increase the accuracy of the targeting and minimize the risk of collateral damage. By adjusting for various factors such as wind speed, target distance, and elevation, the artillery can be aimed more precisely at its intended target.

2. How do you determine which variables to adjust for in artillery targeting?

The variables to adjust for in artillery targeting are determined by analyzing the specific target and the environmental conditions. Factors such as target distance, wind speed and direction, temperature, and elevation are considered when selecting which variables to adjust for.

3. What is the effect of adjusting for variables on the accuracy of artillery targeting?

Adjusting for variables has a significant impact on the accuracy of artillery targeting. By accounting for various factors that can affect the trajectory of the projectile, the targeting becomes more precise and increases the chances of hitting the intended target.

4. Can adjusting for variables in artillery targeting completely eliminate the risk of collateral damage?

While adjusting for variables can greatly reduce the risk of collateral damage, it cannot completely eliminate it. There are always factors that may be unpredictable or uncontrollable, such as sudden changes in wind or unexpected obstacles in the target area.

5. Are there any limitations to adjusting for variables in artillery targeting?

There are limitations to adjusting for variables in artillery targeting, as some factors may be difficult to accurately measure or predict. Additionally, the process of adjusting for variables takes time and resources, which may not always be available in a combat situation.

Similar threads

  • Aerospace Engineering
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top