morrobay said:Are there any modern interpretations of QM that predict the correlations in a Bell Inequality
violation ? Preferably a local non realistic model based on mechanisms.
dauto said:None. All interpretations of QM lead to the same math. The only difference is the interpretation of the math.
Nugatory said:I think you meant "all of them"?
The Bell Inequality is a mathematical inequality proposed by physicist John Stewart Bell in 1964. It is used to test the predictions of quantum mechanics against the assumptions of local realism, which states that objects have definite properties regardless of whether they are measured or not.
Bell Inequality violations suggest that the predictions of quantum mechanics cannot be explained by local realism. This supports the idea that particles can be entangled, meaning that their properties are correlated even when they are separated by large distances. This has important implications for our understanding of the fundamental nature of reality.
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics attempt to explain the underlying principles and concepts of quantum mechanics. Some interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, do not address the Bell Inequality directly. However, other interpretations, such as the many-worlds interpretation, attempt to provide a framework in which the Bell Inequality violations can be understood.
There is no consensus on which interpretation or model of quantum mechanics best predicts Bell Inequality violations. Each interpretation has its own strengths and weaknesses, and it is an ongoing area of research in physics.
The study of Bell Inequality violations is important because it helps us explore the fundamental nature of reality and understand the behavior of particles at a quantum level. It also has practical applications, such as in the development of quantum technologies like quantum computing and secure communication.