Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass

In summary, in Weinberg QFT vol 1, page 69, it is shown that for a Lorentz transformation W, the time-like vector t^{\mu}=(0,0,0,1) with t^2=-1 is invariant, as (Wt)^2=t^2=-1. This is a result of W being a member of a certain subgroup of the Lorentz group and satisfying the condition W^T\eta W=\eta.
  • #1
Heffernana
2
0
In Weinberg QFT vol 1, page 69, when deriving the little group structure for the case of zero mass can anyone explain the following:

The transformation W by definition leaves [itex] k^{\mu}=(0,0,1,1)[/itex] invariant, i.e. [itex]W^{\mu}_{\nu}k^{\nu} = k^{\mu} [/itex]. Why can you immediately deduce from this that for a time-like vector [itex] t^{\mu}=(0,0,0,1)[/itex] whose length (noting Weinberg's bizarre placing of the time component at the end of the 4-vector) is [itex]t^2=-1[/itex] is invariant under the previous W transformation, i.e. that:

[itex](Wt)^{\mu}(Wt)_{\mu}=t^{\mu}t_{\mu}=-1 [/itex]

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
W is defined to be a member of a certain subgroup of the Lorentz group, so it's a Lorentz transformation. By definition, a Lorentz transformation W satisfies [itex]W^T\eta W=\eta[/itex], and this implies [tex](Wt)^2=(Wt)^T\eta(Wt) =t^TW^T\eta Wt=t^T\eta t=t^2=-1.[/tex] You don't have to use the assumption about the components of t for anything other than the final "=-1".
 

Related to Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass

What is the Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass?

The Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass is a theoretical concept in particle physics that refers to the possibility of particles having no mass. This concept was proposed by physicist Steven Weinberg in his book "The Quantum Theory of Fields".

Why is the Weinberg quick question on chapter 2 zero mass important?

The concept of zero mass particles is important because it helps to explain the properties and behavior of certain particles, such as the photon. It also plays a role in the development of the Standard Model of particle physics and our understanding of the fundamental forces of nature.

Can particles actually have zero mass?

According to current scientific knowledge, particles such as photons, gluons, and gravitons are considered to have zero mass. However, the existence of particles with exactly zero mass is still a subject of ongoing research and debate in the field of physics.

How does the concept of zero mass fit into the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity, specifically the special theory of relativity, states that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Particles with zero mass are able to travel at the speed of light, making them consistent with this theory. Additionally, the theory of relativity also predicts that particles with zero mass must have certain properties, such as always moving at the speed of light and having no rest mass.

What are some potential implications of particles having zero mass?

If particles are found to have exactly zero mass, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and the fundamental laws of physics. It could also potentially lead to the discovery of new particles and a deeper understanding of the nature of space and time.

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
948
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
823
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
817
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
973
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top