Very simple applications' issue

In summary, the conversation is about proving an application is bijective and the teacher only studied one case, x = √(y+1)-2, without considering the other case, x = -√(y+1)-2. The student wonders why the teacher did not study the second case.
  • #1
Andrax
117
0

Homework Statement


so i want to prove that an application is bijective
y [itex]\geq[/itex] 1we're looking for an x[itex]\geq[/itex]-2 : y= f(x)
anyway at the end
i have lx+2l=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]
the teached said x = [itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]-2 without studying the other case
Ps: the +1 is includedi nthe square root

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


the other case lx+2l=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]
x+2=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex] or x+2=-[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]

the second x is going to be <2 so we can exclude it the first x is going to be >2 we're oging to use it , but why our teacher didn't study the second case in which x+2 = -[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex] ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Andrax said:

Homework Statement


so i want to prove that an application is bijective
y [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]\left[1[/itex](y >=1)+[itex]\infty[/itex][itex]\left[[/itex] we're looking for an x from [itex]\left[-2[/itex]+[itex]\infty[/itex][itex]\left[[/itex](x>=-2) : y= f(x)
anyway at the end
i have lx+2l=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]
the teached said x = [itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]-2 without studying the other case
Ps: the +1 is includedi nthe square root

Homework Equations

Your LaTeX is broken, so I can't understand what you have attempted to write.
Andrax said:

The Attempt at a Solution


the other case lx+2l=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]
x+2=[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex] or x+2=-[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex]

the second x is going to be <2 so we can exclude it the first x is going to be >2 we're oging to use it , but why our teacher didn't study the second case in which x+2 = -[itex]\sqrt{}y+1[/itex] ?
 

Related to Very simple applications' issue

1. What are "Very simple applications"?

"Very simple applications" refer to software or programs that have minimal features and are generally easy to use. These applications are designed for basic tasks and may not have advanced features or complex user interfaces.

2. What are the benefits of using "Very simple applications"?

The main benefit of using "Very simple applications" is their ease of use. They are typically user-friendly and require minimal learning curve, making them ideal for those who are not tech-savvy. These applications also tend to have smaller file sizes and use less system resources.

3. Are "Very simple applications" suitable for all tasks?

No, "Very simple applications" may not be suitable for all tasks. They are best suited for basic tasks such as word processing, simple calculations, or basic photo editing. For more complex tasks, it is better to use more advanced applications with more features.

4. Can "Very simple applications" be customized or expanded upon?

Some "Very simple applications" may have limited customization options, but they can generally not be expanded upon. These applications are designed to be simple and may not have the capability to add new features or plugins.

5. Are "Very simple applications" free to use?

Not all "Very simple applications" are free to use. Some may require a one-time purchase or a subscription fee. However, there are also many free "Very simple applications" available, especially for basic tasks such as word processing or simple photo editing.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
872
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
871
Back
Top