Verification of inverse square law using photocell is straight line

In summary, the graph for the verification of inverse square law using photocell is a straight line because the intensity of the source and the intensity of the receiver are two different things. The photocell works by allowing light to give energy to the electrons, reducing the resistance and allowing a current to pass. This process is discrete and not affected by the intensity of the light.
  • #1
XuFyaN
50
0
why the graph for the verification of inverse square law using photocell is straight line instead of a curve ?
since intensity is inversely proportional to the distance then graph must be a curve, but why it is straight line ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


XuFyaN said:
why the graph for the verification of inverse square law using photocell is straight line instead of a curve ?
since intensity is inversely proportional to the distance then graph must be a curve, but why it is straight line ?

This is because you are confusing the intensity of the source with the intensity of a reciever. A photocell works by allowing light into it. The light then gives energy to the electrons in the material. It does this to free the electrons from there bound state, so they can become "conduction electrons" and pass on a current. By "knocking off" the electrons, it reduces the resistance and allows a current to pass. The relationship between the current flowing through the LDR (photocell) is dependant on the reduction in resistance which is independant of the intensity coming in, as it is a discrete process of either giving energy to conduction electrons, or simply not.
 

Related to Verification of inverse square law using photocell is straight line

1. What is the inverse square law and how does it relate to photocells?

The inverse square law states that the intensity of a source of light is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. This means that as the distance increases, the intensity of the light decreases. Photocells, which are devices that convert light energy into electrical energy, are often used to measure this decrease in intensity.

2. How is a photocell used to verify the inverse square law?

A photocell is placed at a fixed distance from a light source and the amount of light hitting the photocell is measured. The distance between the light source and the photocell is then doubled, and the light intensity is measured again. This process is repeated for multiple distances, and a graph is created with distance on the x-axis and light intensity on the y-axis. If the graph forms a straight line, it confirms the inverse square law.

3. What factors can affect the accuracy of verifying the inverse square law using a photocell?

The accuracy of the results can be affected by the precision of the equipment used, such as the photocell and the light source. The distance between the light source and the photocell should also be carefully measured and controlled. Additionally, external factors such as ambient light and temperature can also impact the results.

4. Why is it important to verify the inverse square law using a photocell?

The inverse square law is a fundamental principle in physics and is used to understand and calculate the behavior of light in various settings. By verifying this law using a photocell, we can ensure that our measurements and calculations are accurate and reliable. This is crucial in many fields, including astronomy, photography, and lighting design.

5. Are there any real-life applications of verifying the inverse square law using a photocell?

Yes, there are many real-life applications of this verification. For example, understanding the behavior of light according to the inverse square law is essential for photographers to properly expose their photographs. In astronomy, this law is used to calculate the brightness of stars and other celestial objects. It is also crucial in designing lighting systems, such as streetlights and stage lighting, to ensure proper brightness and coverage.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
880
  • Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
560
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top