Thought experiment of Special relativity

In summary, the light source emits two signals that travel at the speed of light and hit the two detectors four feet away from the light source. The detectors each send an electrical signal back to the time detector which arrives at the same time.
  • #1
ta66505477
9
0
I have a little bit confuse on the Simultaneity

I know if there are 2 coordinates. One coordinate S' is moving V relative to S. We all in inertial reference frame. like the following graph.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/2rZ1oHZCa3cmBBdc5050sFIuKvIC8rCcuBtCllSUrX87oVtToLhZgwzaketL6MGqd4nLrzNo8z4=w1816-h795

According to special relativity, we know that the person in S' agrees the light which hits A, B in same time.
The person in S disagrees with S' because the light does not hit A B in same time.

But, If I say, A and B are some kinds of the light sensors. Once A and B detect the light in same time, the car will explode. The guy in S' will die.

In S coordinate, the light does not touch the A B in same time because the train is moving. So the car is not going to explode since the light does not reach A B in same time.

I cannot understand how can someone be alive in S but is dead in S'
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ta66505477 said:
Once A and B detect the light in same time, the car will explode.
Same time in which frame of reference?
 
  • #3
I remember the exact same discussion a while back (but with a lamp lighting up rather than a car exploding). The point is that, as AT says, you have to be more specific when you say that it blows up when A and B are hit at the same time. You have to specify in what inertial system they should be hit at the same time. Any device you may construct to compare the times when A and B are hit is also going to follow the rules of relativity and its construction is going to single out a particular frame in which the car explodes if A and B are hit at the same time. In other frames, it is going to explode if A and B are hit with a particular non-zero time difference. This time difference can be computed based on the frame and its relation to the particular frame.
 
  • #4
Suppose all the things are on the train including devices, time detector and the explosion system. So all device should "agree" the light came from same time because all the devices follow S' coordinate.

Space and time we cannot touch. We cannot hold it on hand so we can easily accept simultaneous time depending on different coordinate. But if we use the concept of simultaneity for applying in the real things, that could be something tricky ( or I am misunderstanding something)

For this problem, I have read couple of textbooks but none of them talking about this.

I re-post the image
http://postimg.org/image/qrxdigm5b/
 
Last edited:
  • #5
ta66505477 said:
Suppose all the things are on the train including devices, time detector and the explosion system. So all device should "agree" the light came from same time because all the devices follow S' coordinate.
You didn't draw in the time detector and the explosion system but if they all agree that the light came from the same time, then we can assume that one way to implement them is to connect the detectors by equal length wires to the time detector and place it and the explosive system in the center of the train car, correct?

ta66505477 said:
Space and time we cannot touch. We cannot hold it on hand so we can easily accept simultaneous time depending on different coordinate. But if we use the concept of simultaneity for applying in the real things, that could be something tricky ( or I am misunderstanding something)
It isn't really tricky, as long as you understand that in the frame of the train, just like the light signals that travel in equal times to the detectors, you have to set up the wiring so that the electrical signals travel from the detectors to the time detector in equal times.

ta66505477 said:
For this problem, I have read couple of textbooks but none of them talking about this.

I re-post the image
http://postimg.org/image/qrxdigm5b/
I have made a spacetime diagram to illustrate your scenario in the frame of the train car:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72021&stc=1&d=1407589803.png

The thick blue line represents the light source, the time detector and the explosion system in the center of the train car. At the Coordinate Time of zero, the light source emits two signals, shown as thin blue lines, in opposite directions that travel at 1 foot per nanosecond (the speed of light) and hit the two detectors shown as the thick black and red lines, each four feet away from the light source. The detectors each send an electrical signal shown as thin lines in their respective colors which, for simplicity we will assume also travel at the speed of light, back to the time detector. As you can see, they arrive at the thick blue line at the same time and the explosion occurs.

Now to see what this scenario looks like in a frame such that the train is traveling at a speed of 0.6 feet per seconds, we use the Lorentz Transformation process to obtain a new set of coordinates for each of the events (dots) and connect the lines appropriately:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72022&stc=1&d=1407589803.png

As you can see, the two electrical signals arrive at the time detector at the same time and so the explosion occurs.

Does this make perfect sense to you? Any questions?
 

Attachments

  • BombOnTrain1.PNG
    BombOnTrain1.PNG
    3.4 KB · Views: 549
  • BombOnTrain2.PNG
    BombOnTrain2.PNG
    6.9 KB · Views: 517
  • #6
ghwellsjr said:
You didn't draw in the time detector and the explosion system but if they all agree that the light came from the same time, then we can assume that one way to implement them is to connect the detectors by equal length wires to the time detector and place it and the explosive system in the center of the train car, correct?


It isn't really tricky, as long as you understand that in the frame of the train, just like the light signals that travel in equal times to the detectors, you have to set up the wiring so that the electrical signals travel from the detectors to the time detector in equal times.


I have made a spacetime diagram to illustrate your scenario in the frame of the train car:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72021&stc=1&d=1407589803.png

The thick blue line represents the light source, the time detector and the explosion system in the center of the train car. At the Coordinate Time of zero, the light source emits two signals, shown as thin blue lines, in opposite directions that travel at 1 foot per nanosecond (the speed of light) and hit the two detectors shown as the thick black and red lines, each four feet away from the light source. The detectors each send an electrical signal shown as thin lines in their respective colors which, for simplicity we will assume also travel at the speed of light, back to the time detector. As you can see, they arrive at the thick blue line at the same time and the explosion occurs.

Now to see what this scenario looks like in a frame such that the train is traveling at a speed of 0.6 feet per seconds, we use the Lorentz Transformation process to obtain a new set of coordinates for each of the events (dots) and connect the lines appropriately:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72022&stc=1&d=1407589803.png

As you can see, the two electrical signals arrive at the time detector at the same time and so the explosion occurs.

Does this make perfect sense to you? Any questions?

I understood now.
What I have overlooked is the wire

attachment.php?attachmentid=72025&stc=1&d=1407594515.jpg


Your graph makes perfect to me. I can think it intuitively by your graph. Like Path A takes less time but the light has to use more time to chase back in Path B. Path C initially takes more time to detector but quickly goes back to center because the train is going toward.

Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • phsysicsaaa.jpg
    phsysicsaaa.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 481
  • #7
ta66505477 said:
I understood now.
What I have overlooked is the wire

attachment.php?attachmentid=72025&stc=1&d=1407594515.jpg


Your graph makes perfect to me. I can think it intuitively by your graph. Like Path A takes less time but the light has to use more time to chase back in Path B. Path C initially takes more time to detector but quickly goes back to center because the train is going toward.

Thank you very much!
You're very welcome. Glad it makes sense now.
 

Related to Thought experiment of Special relativity

1. What is a thought experiment of Special relativity?

A thought experiment of Special relativity is a hypothetical scenario used to explore the implications of Albert Einstein's theory of Special relativity. It involves imagining a situation or scenario and using logical reasoning to understand how the laws of physics behave in that situation.

2. How is a thought experiment of Special relativity different from a real experiment?

A thought experiment of Special relativity is a purely mental exercise, whereas a real experiment involves manipulating physical variables and collecting data. Thought experiments allow scientists to explore concepts that may not be feasible to test in a laboratory setting.

3. What are some famous examples of thought experiments of Special relativity?

One famous thought experiment of Special relativity is the "Twin Paradox," which explores the effects of time dilation on twins who travel at different speeds. Another is the "Ladder Paradox," which examines the length contraction of an object traveling at high speeds.

4. What can we learn from thought experiments of Special relativity?

Thought experiments of Special relativity help us understand the counterintuitive consequences of Einstein's theory, such as time dilation and length contraction. They also challenge our understanding of classical physics and lead to new insights and discoveries.

5. Are thought experiments of Special relativity still relevant today?

Yes, thought experiments of Special relativity are still relevant today. They continue to be used in theoretical physics to explore the implications of Einstein's theory and to develop new theories, such as the theory of general relativity. They also help scientists understand and explain phenomena observed in modern experiments, such as the behavior of particles in particle accelerators.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
866
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
710
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
945
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
309
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
557
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
938
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
Back
Top