"The search for Relativity Violations"

In summary, the article talks about how a "background" electric field can exist even though everything is in a vacuum state, and how this field can break Lorentz symmetry. It also mentions how some fundamental theories contain features that are favorable for spontaneous Lorentz breaking, and that this may lead to violations of Lorentz symmetry at lower energy scales. However, the article doesn't explain what "prevail" means in this context, and it's not clear whether the large scale behavior of the vacuum is always determinable.
  • #1
oquen
109
1
I'm reading the 100 years anniversary edition of Sci-am and there is an article called "The Search for Relativity Violations". Some passages perplexed me:

"In the case of relativity violations,
the equations describing the stick and
the applied force are replaced by the
equations of the ultimate theory. In
place of the stick are the quantum fields
of matter and forces. The natural background
strength of such fields is usually
zero. In certain situations, however,
the background fields acquire a nonzero
strength. Imagine that this happened
for the electric field. Because the electric
field has a direction (technically, it is a
vector), every location in space will
have a special direction singled out by
the direction of the electric field. A
charged particle will accelerate in that
direction. Rotational symmetry is broken
(and so is boost symmetry). The
same reasoning applies for any nonzero
“tensor” field; a vector is a special case
of a tensor.

Such spontaneous nonzero tensor
fields do not arise in the Standard Model,
but some fundamental theories, including
string theory, contain features
that are favorable for spontaneous
Lorentz breaking."

It mentioned electric field breaks Lorentz symmetry yet it added the standard model doesn't break Lorentz symmetry.. isn't electric field part of the standard model?

When you add magnetic field to electric field to become electromagnetic field.. does it break Lorentz symmetry (so called rotational symmetry and boost symmetry)

And what does it mean the fundamental theory may break Lorentz symmetry. Is the consequence for example the strings may all be non-locally connected throughout the universe but at large scale, relativity is a low energy limit. But if the strings can communicate.. won't this cause backward in time causality problem in the low energy limit? How do you make it compatible the low energy obey relativity while at high energy it doesn't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
oquen said:
It mentioned electric field breaks Lorentz symmetry

It said a "background" electric field--i.e., one that is present even though everything is in a vacuum state. In other words, it's describing a hypothetical model in which the vacuum is no longer Lorentz invariant.

oquen said:
isn't electric field part of the standard model?

Yes, but in the Standard Model the vacuum is Lorentz invariant--there is no "background" electric field that is present if everything is in a vacuum state.

oquen said:
what does it mean the fundamental theory may break Lorentz symmetry

It can mean one of two things: that the vacuum is not Lorentz invariant (as described above), or that the underlying Lagrangian itself is not Lorentz invariant (which is a stronger breaking of Lorentz symmetry).
 
  • Like
Likes oquen
  • #3
PeterDonis said:
It said a "background" electric field--i.e., one that is present even though everything is in a vacuum state. In other words, it's describing a hypothetical model in which the vacuum is no longer Lorentz invariant.
Yes, but in the Standard Model the vacuum is Lorentz invariant--there is no "background" electric field that is present if everything is in a vacuum state.
It can mean one of two things: that the vacuum is not Lorentz invariant (as described above), or that the underlying Lagrangian itself is not Lorentz invariant (which is a stronger breaking of Lorentz symmetry).

If at lower energy (large scale) the vacuum is Lorentz invariant.. and at high energy (small scale) the vacuum is not Lorentz invariant.. what will prevail? And does it mean if you use high energy, you can find a preferred frame and relativity not valid?
 
  • #4
oquen said:
If at lower energy (large scale) the vacuum is Lorentz invariant.. and at high energy (small scale) the vacuum is not Lorentz invariant.. what will prevail?

What do you mean by "prevail"? In such a hypothetical model, if you do a low energy, larger scale experiment, you will see Lorentz invariance; if you do a high enough energy (small enough scale) experiment, you will see violations of Lorentz invariance.

oquen said:
does it mean if you use high energy, you can find a preferred frame and relativity not valid?

In such a hypothetical model, yes.
 
  • #5
PeterDonis said:
What do you mean by "prevail"? In such a hypothetical model, if you do a low energy, larger scale experiment, you will see Lorentz invariance; if you do a high enough energy (small enough scale) experiment, you will see violations of Lorentz invariance.
In such a hypothetical model, yes.

The consequence if such hypothetical model was true is that at large scale you can't send signal faster than light.. but at small enough scale (high enough energy) you can send signal faster than light because relativity was overridden? but how does it make sense? Because if your do the small enough scale experiment and the signal was instantaneously received a light year away, there would be some inertial frame where it could go backward in time.. or does it mean the large scale won't be able to see the small scale instantaneous signal.. hypothetically??
 
  • #6
oquen said:
The consequence if such hypothetical model was true is that at large scale you can't send signal faster than light.. but at small enough scale (high enough energy) you can send signal faster than light because relativity was overridden?

Lorentz invariance violation doesn't necessarily mean you can send signals faster than light; you would have to have a specific model to see if it allowed that. But if the model did allow it, yes, it would be on a small scale only.

oquen said:
if your do the small enough scale experiment and the signal was instantaneously received a light year away

Then it isn't a small scale experiment.
 
  • Like
Likes oquen
  • #7
PeterDonis said:
Lorentz invariance violation doesn't necessarily mean you can send signals faster than light; you would have to have a specific model to see if it allowed that. But if the model did allow it, yes, it would be on a small scale only.
Then it isn't a small scale experiment.

You mean the faster than light only occurs in the small scale or say within dozens times the Planck length only and won't even reach outside the laboratory and if it hits Neptune instantaneously, then since it's no longer small scale and big scale obeys relativity.. then it won't happen at all? No exceptions? Is there no current model or physicists that described such?
 
  • #8
oquen said:
You mean the faster than light only occurs in the small scale or say within dozens times the Planck length only and won't even reach outside the laboratory

That's the kind of hypothetical model that the SciAm article appears to be describing. But it's just a hypothetical model; AFAIK nobody has actually constructed one and tried to make definite predictions from it. It's just speculation.

oquen said:
Is there no current model or physicists that described such?

Not that I'm aware of.
 

Related to "The search for Relativity Violations"

What is relativity?

Relativity is a physical theory proposed by Albert Einstein in the early 20th century. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, regardless of their relative velocity or position.

What are relativity violations?

Relativity violations refer to any experimental evidence or theoretical predictions that contradict the principles of relativity. This could include the existence of a preferred frame of reference or the observation of particles traveling faster than the speed of light.

Why is the search for relativity violations important?

The search for relativity violations is important because it helps us to understand the fundamental laws of the universe. If relativity is proven to be incorrect, it would require a major overhaul of our current understanding of physics and could lead to groundbreaking discoveries.

What methods are used to search for relativity violations?

Scientists use a variety of methods to search for relativity violations, including experiments with high-energy particles, precision measurements of the speed of light, and observations of astronomical phenomena. The goal is to look for any inconsistencies or deviations from the predictions of relativity.

Have any relativity violations been found?

So far, no definitive relativity violations have been found. However, there have been some experimental results that have raised questions and sparked further research. One example is the observation of neutrinos apparently traveling faster than the speed of light, which was later found to be due to a measurement error.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
237
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
911
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top