Sudden barrier removal to half harmonic oscillator

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the possible energy measurements as a function of time and the wavefunction for all times for a particle in the ground state of a half harmonic oscillator. An error is pointed out in assuming the system is in the first excited state of the full harmonic oscillator and the correct wave function is given. The conversation then delves into using Fourier series to solve for the coefficients and the importance of properly integrating the Hermite polynomials.
  • #1
faradayslaw
51
0

Homework Statement


A particle is in the ground state of a half harmonic oscillator (V=m/2 w^2 x^2 x>0, and infinity x<0). At t=0, the barrier at x=0 is suddenly removed. Find the possible energy measurements as a function of time and the wavefunction for all times.


Homework Equations


<H> = <psi|H|psi>, |psi(t)>=Ʃexp(-i*H*t/hbar)|psin(t)> cn


The Attempt at a Solution


At t=0, the wavefunction is in the 1st excited state of the full harmonic oscillator, and due to normalization in the half harmonic oscillator, the ground state of the half HO is √2 times the first excited state for the full one. Thus, |psi(0)> = 1/2^0.5 * |psi1>, and so cn=0 for n≠1 and cn=1/√2 for n=1. We then have |psi(t)> = 1/2^0.5 * |psi1> * exp(-i*(3/2 hb w)t/hb). So, |psi(t)> = 1/2^0.5 * |psi1> * exp(-i*(3/2 w)t). This doesn't seem right to me, since the particle is in such a trivial linear combination of states, but I don't see where I have gone wrong, and it makes sense that the expected energy is unchanged. So, can someone point out if there is a mistake? The possible energies to be measured are only 3/2 hbar w, since the particle is in a trivial superposition of just |psi1>

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The mistake you're making is assuming the system is in the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator. Its wave function isn't [itex]\psi_1(x)[/itex]; it's actually
[tex]\psi(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll}\psi_1(x) & \mathrm{if}~x>0 \\ 0 & \mathrm{if}~x \le 0\end{array}\right.[/tex]at t=0 (up to normalization).
 
  • #3
vela said:
The mistake you're making is assuming the system is in the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator. Its wave function isn't [itex]\psi_1(x)[/itex]; it's actually
[tex]\psi(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll}\psi_1(x) & \mathrm{if}~x>0 \\ 0 & \mathrm{if}~x \le 0\end{array}\right.[/tex]at t=0 (up to normalization).

Thanks, that's true. But still for x>0, psi is just psi1, and for x<0, since the Hermite polynomials are linearly independent, no non-trivial linear combination of them can be equal to zero. So, the energy eigenvalue is still only 3/2 hbar w, then?

Thanks,
 
  • #4
No, that's not correct. You would get only the trivial solution if the linear combination were equal to 0 for all x.
 
  • #5
vela said:
No, that's not correct. You would get only the trivial solution if the linear combination were equal to 0 for all x.
Ok, so we need to express psi in a basis of the eigenfunctions of the SHO Hamiltonian. for x>0, it is simple as psi1. For x<0, we can't construct a non-trivial linear combination of Hermite polynomials to be zero. So, how can we express psi as nontrivial for x<0.
 
  • #6
You can't look at it x<0 and x>0 separately. The same expansion has to hold for all x.
 
  • #7
vela said:
You can't look at it x<0 and x>0 separately. The same expansion has to hold for all x.
Thanks again,

Can we say psi(x) = psi1(x)/T(x), where T(x) = infinity for x<0 and T(x)=1 for x>0. psi(x) is itself still continuous, but then psi'(x) is not, so I guess not.

But, unless the coefficients themselves are functions of x, I don't see how it would be possible to construct an expansion valid for all x.
 
  • #8
Think Fourier series. It's the same idea.

You have the state [itex]\vert \psi \rangle[/itex], and you want to expand it in terms of the eigenstates [itex]\vert 0 \rangle[/itex], [itex]\vert 1 \rangle[/itex], [itex]\vert 2 \rangle[/itex], etc.
[tex]\vert \psi \rangle = c_0 \vert 0 \rangle + c_1 \vert 1 \rangle + c_2 \vert 2 \rangle + \cdots[/tex]To solve for cn, you take advantage of the orthonormality of the eigenstates:
[tex]\langle n \vert \psi \rangle = c_0\langle n \vert 0 \rangle + c_1\langle n \vert 1 \rangle + c_2\langle n \vert 2 \rangle + \cdots = c_n [/tex]To connect this back to the wave functions, insert a complete set to get
[tex]c_n = \langle n \vert \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dx\,\langle n \vert x\rangle\langle x \vert \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \phi_n^*(x)\psi(x)\,dx[/tex]where [itex]\phi_n(x)[/itex] is the eigenfunction for the nth state.
 
  • #9
Right, but the above integral reduces then to Integral from 0 to inf. of phin* psi(x) dx, since psi(x)=0 for x<0 and psi(x) is phi1 for x>0, and so all cn are zero except c1, since the above integral is the inner product of two elements of an L^2 Inner product space, and we are considering inner product of basis elements of that space, which are orthogonal. Is there some mistake?
 
  • #10
The orthogonality relation for the Hermite polynomials only holds when you integrate the polynomials from -infinity to infinity. It doesn't hold when you integrate from 0 to infinity. For instance, with H0(x)=1 and H1(x)=2x, you get
[tex]\int_0^\infty H_0(x)H_1(x)e^{-x^2}\,dx = \int_0^\infty 2xe^{-x^2}\,dx=1[/tex]whereas
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty H_0(x)H_1(x)e^{-x^2}\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty 2xe^{-x^2}\,dx=0[/tex]
 
  • #11
vela said:
The orthogonality relation for the Hermite polynomials only holds when you integrate the polynomials from -infinity to infinity. It doesn't hold when you integrate from 0 to infinity. For instance, with H0(x)=1 and H1(x)=2x, you get
[tex]\int_0^\infty H_0(x)H_1(x)e^{-x^2}\,dx = \int_0^\infty 2xe^{-x^2}\,dx=1[/tex]whereas
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty H_0(x)H_1(x)e^{-x^2}\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty 2xe^{-x^2}\,dx=0[/tex]

Of course! Thanks again, I can solve it from here.
 

Related to Sudden barrier removal to half harmonic oscillator

1. What is a "sudden barrier removal" in the context of a half harmonic oscillator?

A sudden barrier removal refers to the instantaneous removal of a potential barrier in a half harmonic oscillator system. This creates a sudden change in the system's potential energy and can lead to interesting dynamics and behaviors.

2. What is a half harmonic oscillator?

A half harmonic oscillator is a physical system with harmonic motion only in one direction, such as a particle moving along a horizontal line with a restoring force proportional to its displacement from the origin.

3. How does a sudden barrier removal affect a half harmonic oscillator?

A sudden barrier removal can cause the half harmonic oscillator to exhibit non-periodic or chaotic behavior, as the sudden change in potential energy disrupts the oscillatory motion and can lead to unpredictable movements.

4. What are some real-life examples of a half harmonic oscillator?

A swinging pendulum, a mass attached to a spring hanging vertically, and a ball rolling on a curved surface (such as a bowl) are all examples of a half harmonic oscillator. These systems exhibit harmonic motion in one direction only.

5. How is a sudden barrier removal to a half harmonic oscillator relevant in scientific research?

Studying the dynamics and behaviors of a half harmonic oscillator with a sudden barrier removal can provide insights into complex systems and phenomena, such as chaotic behavior and phase transitions. This research can have applications in various fields, including physics, engineering, and biology.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
419
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
102
Replies
16
Views
748
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top