Status of CH & Large Cardinals in New Foundations

  • I
  • Thread starter tzimie
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Foundations
In summary, the conversation discusses the concepts of the axiom of choice, the generalized continuum hypothesis, Mahlo's axiom, and $0#^+$. The participants question whether the axiom of choice refutes the generalized continuum hypothesis and express uncertainty about Mahlo, $0#^+$, and other related concepts.
  • #1
tzimie
259
28
Actually, the whole question is in the subject line )
I know that NF refutes AC, so there should be no GCH (is it correct?)
But I have no idea about Mahlo, 0# etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A:The axiom of choice is equivalent over ZF (Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory) to the statement that every set can be well ordered. The generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH) is equivalent over ZF to the statement that every subset of a set of reals has either the same cardinality as the reals or the same cardinality as the naturals. Mahlo's axiom is an extension of the axiom of regularity, and states that every set of sets can be well ordered. $0#^+$ is a fragment of the axiom of choice asserting the existence of certain kinds of infinite sequences of sets.
 

Related to Status of CH & Large Cardinals in New Foundations

1. What is the CH and why is it important in the study of large cardinals?

The CH, or Continuum Hypothesis, is a conjecture in set theory that states that there is no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of the integers and the real numbers. It is important in the study of large cardinals because it is closely related to the existence of large cardinal axioms, which are statements about the existence of sets with extremely large cardinalities.

2. How does the status of CH impact the study of large cardinals in New Foundations?

The status of CH is a significant issue in the study of large cardinals in New Foundations, as it is a foundational theory that allows for the existence of large cardinals. If CH were proven to be true, it would have major implications for the existence of large cardinals in New Foundations and other foundational theories.

3. What is the current understanding of the status of CH in New Foundations?

The current understanding of the status of CH in New Foundations is that it remains an open problem. While there have been some attempts to prove or disprove CH in New Foundations, no definitive answer has been reached. As such, it remains a topic of ongoing research and debate.

4. Are there any connections between the status of CH and large cardinal axioms in New Foundations?

Yes, there are connections between the status of CH and large cardinal axioms in New Foundations. Some large cardinal axioms, such as the existence of a strongly compact cardinal, imply the negation of CH, while others, such as the existence of a measurable cardinal, are consistent with both the truth and falsity of CH.

5. What are some potential implications of resolving the status of CH in New Foundations?

If the status of CH were to be definitively resolved in New Foundations, it would have significant implications for our understanding of large cardinals and the foundations of mathematics. It could also impact other areas of mathematics, such as the study of infinity and the continuum, and have practical applications in fields such as computer science and cryptography.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
772
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top