Roulette is Unbeatable, but let's change the payout

  • Thread starter Roll With It
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Change
In summary, my friends and I were discussing casino games and roulette. One of us brought up the house edge and we couldn't seem to agree on what it is. I looked up roulette math on the internet and found that changing the payout changes the game. This changes the game in a way that gives the player an edge. However, this edge is very small and it's not worth it to play roulette longterm.
  • #1
Roll With It
3
0
Hey all, long time reader/lurker!

I was having a nice get together with friends and one of the friendly discussions we had during our feast involved casino games. One of which was roulette. All of us agreed it's a sucker's game.
Out of curiosity, what would it take for any of us to sit down and play American or European Roulette? Would changing the payout for every time you WIN on your bet be enough to overcome the house’s edge? If so, what kind of payout is necessary to have a 1% edge over the house? What about a big 5% player edge?
We went back and forth on this for a few minutes, but it’s still driving me nuts because I know it should be simple to figure out, yet I can't.

FACTS:
American roulette (00) – 38 numbers, 35:1 – House edge 5.26% - probability to win 47.3%
Single Zero roulette (0) – 37 numbers, 35:1 – House edge 2.70% - probability to win 48.6%
European roulette (0) – 37 numbers, (1/2 money return on 1:1 bets when it lands on 0) 35:1 – House edge 1.36% - probability to win 49.3%?


My simple math and most likely incorrect:
On the American roulette, l bet $10 on RED (1:1 bet). I win $10 +$0.63.
10 + 5.26% (house edge) + 1.00% (my edge) = $10.63
So as long as I get 6.26% on top of my original bet I have a long term 1% edge? It doesn’t look or sound right to me.
On the American roulette wheel I am expected to lose about $0.53 per $10 in the long run, but if the casino gives me an additional $0.63 for every time I win, will beat them in the long term correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course, the bigger the house pays over the odds the more people will want to play the game so I'm not sure what the point is. Are you trying to fix the payout to compensate for the house edge built-in to the equipment? Then the usual approach is to fix the payout to the true odds. Compare with simpler games.

There are lots of ways to make biased equipment fair just by changing the way the game is played. Respin every time the house wins for eg.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Yeah, like a special weekend the casino changes the payout in "favor" for the player. I don't know why, maybe to increase foot traffic?

Never mind that, the point was/is I wanted to know whether changing the payout without changing the game itself can actually give the player and edge in the long run. My friend said no no it doesn't matter because of the probability to win and independent events, blah blah. At first I passively agreed about what he said, but then I thought about it for a minute and flat out rejected what he was saying because it didn't make sense.

The spin is random, independent and has no memory, fact. What makes the game unbeatable in the long run is the payout, not only the probability of winning on your number or color.

So I said think about it! On American roulette, there are 38 numbers and if they paid you 38:1, the house edge = 0%. So, if they changed it to 39:1, the player has an edge, albeit very small, but nevertheless an edge.

Sorry if this seems so trivial and silly, but I want to be right! You know it's just one of those kind of conversations that started out as nothing, but now it's a battle to be right. ;)

I looked at roulette math on the internet, but I needed someone here to flat out say hey you're right.
 
  • #4
Well, yes, changing the payout changes the game. That's why you get odds offered in various sports betting.

If the odds are long though there can be a wait before you'd expect to see a payoff - and each turn of the wheel is independent... so you can end up spending quite a lot of money before you break even.
 
  • #5
Simon Bridge said:
Well, yes, changing the payout changes the game. That's why you get odds offered in various sports betting.

If the odds are long though there can be a wait before you'd expect to see a payoff - and each turn of the wheel is independent... so you can end up spending quite a lot of money before you break even.

Well that goes back to one of my original questions. You end up spending money before you break even, but what's the magic number? What kind of return is it necessary to make your sit down worthwhile?
 
  • #6
In a fair game you can, at best, expect to break even.
People gamble because they think they can beat the odds.

The best bets are those where the odds are in your favor but don't look like that ... as in face-up draw poker.
 

Related to Roulette is Unbeatable, but let's change the payout

1. Can roulette really be unbeatable?

Yes, the odds in roulette are stacked in favor of the house, making it virtually unbeatable in the long run.

2. How does changing the payout affect the game?

Changing the payout in roulette can significantly alter the odds and increase the house advantage, making it even more difficult to beat the game.

3. Is there a strategy that can beat roulette?

No, there is no reliable strategy that can guarantee a win in roulette, as the game is purely based on chance.

4. Why do casinos offer different payouts for roulette?

Casinos offer different payouts for roulette in order to attract more players and to make a profit, as the house always has an edge in the game.

5. Is changing the payout legal?

Yes, casinos have the right to change the payout for roulette as they see fit, as long as it is within the regulations set by gaming authorities.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top