Reasonable measurement of both coordinate and momentum?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of defining a reasonable observable operator that can measure a two-component observable for approximate position and momentum without contradicting Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The question also arises about whether it is possible to determine the momentum of a particle inside a barrier using quantum mechanics, and whether such problems can be interpreted in terms of QM. The concept of POVMs is introduced as a generalization of traditional measurements in QM, making it easier to prove important theorems such as Gleason's theorem.
  • #1
MichPod
228
45
Can a reasonable observable operator be defined which measures a two-component observable, first component for the approximate coordinate and the second for the approximate momentum (so that the precision of each measurement do not contradict Heisenberg inequality)?

I am actually thinking of how to define formally a problem of measuring of the particle speed inside a barrier (for quantum tunneling effect), i.e. can we reasonably ask what is the momentum of the particle inside the barrier? We, of course, can ask what is the average momentum or a momentum distribution, but what about asking what is the momentum IF the particle COULD BE found in some region? Can this sort of problems be reasonably interpreted in the terms of QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You could make a Fourier transformation of "particle wavefunction in space but limited to the box" and consider this as momentum distribution for the particle in the box. I'm not sure how meaningful that would be, however.
 
  • #3
There are POVMs for the simultaneous (and inaccurate) measurement of position and momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and dextercioby
  • #4
A. Neumaier said:
There are POVMs for the simultaneous (and inaccurate) measurement of position and momentum.

A POVM is a generalization of the normal measurements you learned about in your QM textbooks. Physically it comes about from using a probe to observe a system then observing the probe, but these days is often taken as the fundamental kind of observation in QM. The important Gleason's theorem, which has a reputation as hard to prove, is much easier using POVM's than the normal Von-Neumann measurements, for example.

See:
http://www.quantum.umb.edu/Jacobs/QMT/QMT_Chapter1.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb

Related to Reasonable measurement of both coordinate and momentum?

1. How do you measure both coordinate and momentum accurately?

To measure both coordinate and momentum accurately, you need to use precise measuring instruments such as rulers, calipers, and accelerometers. Additionally, you must take multiple measurements and calculate the average to minimize errors.

2. What is the uncertainty associated with measuring both coordinate and momentum?

The uncertainty associated with measuring both coordinate and momentum is dependent on the resolution and precision of the measuring instruments used. The smaller the resolution and higher the precision, the lower the uncertainty will be.

3. How does quantum mechanics affect the measurement of both coordinate and momentum?

In quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is impossible to know both the exact coordinate and momentum of a particle simultaneously. Therefore, the measurement of both quantities will always have some degree of uncertainty.

4. How can we ensure the reliability of measurements for both coordinate and momentum?

To ensure the reliability of measurements for both coordinate and momentum, it is crucial to use calibrated and accurate measuring instruments. Additionally, repeating the measurements and calculating the average can help to reduce errors and increase reliability.

5. What are some common sources of error when measuring both coordinate and momentum?

Some common sources of error when measuring both coordinate and momentum include human error, instrument error, environmental factors such as temperature and vibration, and the intrinsic uncertainty of quantum mechanics. Proper calibration and using multiple measurements can help to minimize these errors.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
416
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
959
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
721
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top