Radiation Levels: Inverse Square Law Outcome at 6m

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of the inverse square law to determine the radiation level at a distance from a point source. It is mentioned that at 2m, the radiation level is 400mGy/hr and at 6m, it should be 44.4mGy/hr. However, it is clarified that the radiation level cannot be calculated at the point of radiation using this law. It is also noted that the radiation level decreases by a factor of 3 when the distance is tripled. The conversation also touches on the relationship between distance and area, and how the radiation dose decreases as the distance squared. Finally, the question of why the x-radiation shielding HVL system needs to be calculated is
  • #1
nonphysical
15
0
Using the inverse square law could anyone tell me what the outcome of this problem is?
If the radiation level is 400mGy/hr at 2m from the point radiation source, what will be the radiation level at 6m?
I figured it would be 1600mGy/hr at the point, and therefore 44.4mGy/hr at 6m
being distance squared of 6m

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not quite. You can't use the inverse square law to find the radiation level AT the point, because the distance would be zero, and therefore the radiation infinite. Notice however that 6m is 3 times farther away than 2m... so by what factor should the radiation decrease?
 
  • #3
Zhermes
Q. If the radiation level is 400mGy/hr at 2m from a point source, what will be the radiation level be at 6m?

Are you saying the radiation level will decrease by a factor of three?

If at the piont of radiation the level is 1600mGy/hr, then at 2m it should represent a factor of four , ie 400mGy/hr at 2m. therefore at 3m should represent a factor of nine, etc.

Does this mean the radiation dose level drops or just the area increases, or both?
 
  • #4
nonphysical said:
If at the piont of radiation the level is 1600mGy/hr, then at 2m it should represent a factor of four , ie 400mGy/hr at 2m.
Again, you can't talk about the amount of radiation AT the point.
nonphysical said:
therefore at 3m should represent a factor of nine, etc.
There you go.

nonphysical said:
Does this mean the radiation dose level drops or just the area increases, or both?
Both. The total radiation is constant no matter how far away you are; the area over which that radiation is distributed increases as the distance squared. Therefore the radiation per unit area (which is proportional to the radiation dose) drops as the distance squared.
 
  • #5
Thanks for the reply

OK so the radiation level at 6m is still 400mGy/hr but covering an area of 36m2

as per 400mGy/hr at 2m covering an area of 4m2

How come the x-radiation shielding HVL system has to be calculated?
Why not just shield for the given dose rate regardless of distance, if the dose remains constant?

If the dose remains the same but proportional given the area, does this therefore mean at 2m the dose rate is 100mGy/hr for each square metre
And the same would apply at a distance of 6m being 36m2 each sqare metre having radiation penetration equivanlent to the proportion of the original dose spread over that area ie 11.11each?
 

Related to Radiation Levels: Inverse Square Law Outcome at 6m

What is the inverse square law for radiation levels?

The inverse square law for radiation levels states that the intensity of radiation is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. This means that as the distance from the source increases, the radiation level decreases exponentially.

What is the outcome of the inverse square law at 6 meters?

At 6 meters from the source, the radiation level will be one-fourth of the level at 3 meters from the source. This is because the distance is doubled, so the inverse square law states that the radiation level will decrease by a factor of 4 (2 squared).

How does the inverse square law affect radiation exposure?

The inverse square law means that the further away someone is from a source of radiation, the lower their exposure will be. This is why safety measures, such as shielding and distance, are important in minimizing radiation exposure for workers in nuclear facilities.

What other factors can affect radiation levels besides distance?

Other factors that can affect radiation levels include the type of radiation, the energy of the radiation, and the duration of exposure. Shielding materials, such as lead or concrete, can also greatly reduce radiation levels.

How is the inverse square law used in radiation safety?

The inverse square law is an important principle in radiation safety, as it helps to determine the appropriate distance from a source to minimize exposure. It is also used in calculating the necessary shielding and safety measures for workers in nuclear facilities.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
418
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
996
Replies
3
Views
847
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top