** Question related to Orbital speed of star, Keep getting *10^4 to high?

In summary: I think I did (4.5*10^27)/(2.2*10^30+4.5*10^27) x 3.1*10^11which is 6.327965525*108 :confused: (not sure why I typed 6.34E8 :redface: )In summary, the conversation discusses a question regarding the orbital speed of a star and the value obtained being too high. The conversation goes on to provide the necessary equations and attempt at a solution to the problem. It is concluded that the correct value for the orbital speed of the star is approximately 50m/s.
  • #1
pargeterw
9
0
*Please Help* Question related to Orbital speed of star, Keep getting *10^4 to high??

Homework Statement



A star has a mass of 2.2*1030kg, there is a planet of mass 4.5*1027kg orbiting it at a distance of 3.1*1011m (also told that it has a "period of wobble" of 9.2*107s due to the orbiting of the planet)

The start is orbiting about the centre of mass of the star/planet system.

Show that the speed of the star in its circular orbit is about 50m/s

Homework Equations



v=sqrt((G*M)/r)
where G=6.67*10-11m3/kg/s2
M=mass of orbiting object
r=radius of orbit

The Attempt at a Solution



I know M=2.2*1030
I know G=6.67*10-11
so I only need r

r is the distance from C.O.M of the Star/planet system to the star, and it follows that this would equal ((4.5*1027)*(3.1*1011))/((4.5*1027)+(2.2*1030)) = 6.33*108
because <x>=(∑mixi)/(∑mi)

therefore substituting M, G, and r into the equation for v should, one would hope, give about 50m/s

it does in fact, give 48*104.

this is slightly hopeful, as 48≈50, although not correct, as 104 ≠ 1!

does anybody have any idea what I got wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
welcome to pf!

hi pargeterw! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
pargeterw said:
r is the C.O.M of the Star/planet, so it follows that it would be at a distance of ((4.5*10^27)*(3.1*10^11))/((4.5*10^27)+(2.2*10^30)) = 6.33*10^8

erm :redface:

that's the distance of the c.o.m. from the star! :rolleyes:
 
  • #3


tiny-tim said:
that's the distance of the c.o.m. from the star! :rolleyes:

I know that, isn't that the distance that I want?
 
Last edited:
  • #4


so distance of star from com as you say is r= 6.33E8.
period of orbit = 9.2E7
Circular orbit is 2.*pi. r/T = 43ms^-1
 
  • #5
no, you want the orbital radius r of the planet,

ie the distance of the planet from the c.o.m.

(though since the question says "about", i think you're supposed to pretend that r is just the distance given, between the planet and the star :wink:)
 
  • #6


Why do I want the orbital distance of the planet when I'm trying to work out the orbital speed of the star?
 
  • #7


@ppzmis - you seem to have the right answer, which is encouraging, how can you have used the Time "period of wobble" since surely this is caused by the orbiting of the planet around the star, and I'm trying to calculate the speed of the star about the C.O.M of the system?

EDIT - although surely 43m/s is about 40m/s not about 50m/s? so looking less encouraging now :(
 
  • #8


My thought was that the time period of the wobble is related to the planet moving around the star but both star and planet must orbit around the centre of mass with the same period. Otherwise if you think about a star and planet orbiting around a point in space you could end up with the impossible situation where the star and planet are both on the same side of the centre of mass!

43 is ~50 to 1 sig fig! I reckon that with those numbers and the question as it stands that is the right answer. Check you've copied the numbers correctly. The radius of orbit of the star is 6.34E8 but that won't make much difference.
 
  • #9


You're right about the Time period being relevant, but it appears that the main cause of the problem was me trying to be too clever for the question and cut a corner with the centre of mass thing. The truth is that both methods should work, and yours (stemming from my cheating ways) only produces a lower value than it should because the values in the question are not accurately fabricated. The most annoying thing is that while it was a completely valid method, it was not on the mark scheme, and would barely have got me any marks, if at all. I did however work out the answer the long way around, see below for your interest

Thanks a lot for helping though!

Will

v=(2πr)/T and a=(v2/r)

now a=F/M and F=(GMm)/R2
so a=((6.67*10-11)*(4.5*1027))/((3.1*1011)2)
so a=3.12*10-6ms-2

if you do some re-arranging of the first two formulae,

a=(v2/r) --------> r=(v2)/a
and since v=(2πr)/T --------> r=(a*T2)/(4π2)

Substituting that into v=(2πr)/T and cancelling like crazy gives

v=(aT)/(2π)

v=((3.12*10-6)*(9.2*107))/(2π)

v= 45.68ms-1 ≈ 50ms-1 QED

:)
 
  • #10


Also,

ppzmis said:
The radius of orbit of the star is 6.34E8 but that won't make much difference.

How did you get that? It's 6.327965525*108 according to my calculator...
 

Related to ** Question related to Orbital speed of star, Keep getting *10^4 to high?

1. What is the formula for calculating orbital speed of a star?

The formula for calculating orbital speed of a star is V = √(GM/r), where V is the orbital speed, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the star, and r is the distance between the star and the object it is orbiting around.

2. Why do I keep getting a result that is 10^4 times too high?

This could be due to using the wrong units in the calculation. Make sure to use consistent units, such as meters for distance and kilograms for mass. Also, check for any errors in your calculations or the values you are using for G and M.

3. Can the orbital speed of a star change?

Yes, the orbital speed of a star can change over time. This can be due to factors such as the star's mass changing or interactions with other objects in its orbit.

4. How does the orbital speed of a star affect its orbit?

The orbital speed of a star determines the shape and size of its orbit. A higher orbital speed will result in a larger and more elliptical orbit, while a lower orbital speed will result in a smaller and more circular orbit.

5. Can the orbital speed of a star be greater than the speed of light?

No, the speed of light is the maximum speed at which any object can travel. The orbital speed of a star can be very high, but it can never exceed the speed of light.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top