Quantization of electromagnetic field

[mritunjay]

Instead of quantizing the vector potential A^μ why we do not directly quantize the B and E fields in electrodynamics.

 

[cmos]

You can. The field Hamiltonian can be written as an integral of E² + B² (probably with some constants that I'm missing). Expand E and B in terms of Fourier modes and you'll end up with the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator. Quantization follows.

 

[Bill_K]

Yes, the Hamiltonian is H = ½ ∫ (E² + B²) d³x, but this is only a shorthand for the same expression written out in terms of A:

H = ½ ∫ (A^·2 + (∇ x A)²) d³x

You still have to quantize using the canonical variables A and E ≡ A^·.

 

[tom.stoer]

You still have to quantize using the canonical variables A and E ≡ A^·.

That's exactly the point.

Quantizing means to identify fundamental variables and to promote a classical Poisson bracket for canonical conjugate variables to a commutator. E and B are not canonical conjugate; it is not possible to express the (classical) dynamics using E and B.

 

[mritunjay]

Thanks a lot for the answer and useful comments. But can somebody explain to me why E and B are not canonically conjugate variables?

 

[tom.stoer]

... can somebody explain to me why E and B are not canonically conjugate variables?

Let's look at some action S in terms of some variables x, y, ... and their time derivatives dx/dt, dy/dt, ...

The definiton of the canonical momentum is always

[tex]p_x = \frac{\delta S}{\delta \dot{x}}[/tex]

We then have the classical Poisson brackets

[tex]\{x,p_x\} = 1[/tex]

In case of electrodynamics the fundamental variable x is replaced by A(x); x is something like a "continuous index". That means that the canonical momentum is defined by

[tex]P^i(x) = \frac{\delta S}{\delta \dot{A}^i(x)}[/tex]

where i=1..3 is the i-th spatial direction.

Using the Lagrangian of electrodynamics one can show that P(x) corresponds to the electromagnetic field E(x). B(x) can be expressed in terms of A(x) w/o any time derivative, i.e .w/o using the canoncal conjugate momentum, so the fundamental variable is A(x) and the canonical conjugate momentum is E(x).

In addition E and B are not sufficient to define classical electrodynamics. The problem is that neither E nor B couple directly to the currents, but A does. The coupling term is

[tex]A_\mu j^\mu[/tex]

which cannot be formulated using only E and B.

Note that there is one problem, namely the missing time derivative in A°(x) and therefore the missing canonical conjugate momentum which makes A°(x) a Lagrangian multiplier (instead of a dynamical field) generating the time-independent Gauss constraint. This fact is closely related to gauge symmetry.