Quality of rational approximations

In summary, 22/7, 99/70, 193/71 and 355/113 are all good approximations for π, with 355/113 being the best. This phenomenon is not limited to π, as e also has a similar pattern of continued fractions. However, it is interesting to note that algebraic numbers are not as well approximated by rationals, which may explain why π and e have better approximations with smaller denominators. This topic has been studied by mathematicians such as Dyson and is known as Roth's theorem. It is unclear if there is any specific reason for this pattern or if it is simply a coincidence.
  • #1
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2023 Award
33,424
19,959
22/7 is a very good approximation for π. Sqrt(2) doesn’t do that well until 99/70 and e doesn’t do that well until 193/71. 355/113 is even better.

Is there some reason for this? Perhaps geometrical? Why do the ratios of small integers work better for π than other numbers? Or is it just coincidence? ("Gotta be something...")
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Sure, but e has one too. What's special, if anythnig, about pi?
 
  • #4
If you want to keep the denominators of the rationals somewhat small, then algebraic numbers are not well approximated by rationals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth's_theorem

ps. Interesting that Dyson had worked on these matters.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, FactChecker, PeroK and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
797
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
66
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Chemistry
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top