Pulsar Clock: The Mystery of Slowing Rotation in a Spaceship

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of time dilation and the difference between the twin paradox and time dilation. It also mentions that no energy is needed to change the rotational speed of a pulsar in both cases.
  • #1
Ross Arden
93
0
If a pulsar with a period of exactly 1 second was put in a spaceship and accelerated up to V where would the energy come from to slow the rotation of the pulsar ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Pulsar remains the same period in the rocket system. No addition or deletion of energy. Lorentz transformation and addition/deletion of energy are different things.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Ross Arden said:
If a pulsar with a period of exactly 1 second was put in a spaceship and accelerated up to V where would the energy come from to slow the rotation of the pulsar ?
What is the formula for the kinetic energy of a relativistically rotating and translating object?
 
  • #4
Ross Arden said:
If a pulsar with a period of exactly 1 second was put in a spaceship and accelerated up to V where would the energy come from to slow the rotation of the pulsar ?
No energy is needed to slow the rotation of the pulsar, because it doesn't slow down the way you're thinking.

You will have to tell us more about how your experiment works, because two really quite different things are often described as "moving clocks slow down". Are you planning to send the pulsar out on a round trip: the spaceship accelerates away, turns around and comes back, when it's back we ask a crew member how many times it rotated during the trip? Or will the ship carrying the pulsar keep on flying away while the crew member radios back periodic status reports: "The pulsar has rotated X times since my last report?"

The former is the twin paradox; the latter is time dilation. No energy is needed to change the rotational speed of the pulsar in either case, but the explanation of why is different.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I would like to discontinue this thread
 
  • #6
Ross Arden said:
I would like to discontinue this thread

Thread closed at OP's request.
 

Related to Pulsar Clock: The Mystery of Slowing Rotation in a Spaceship

1. How does the pulsar clock work?

The pulsar clock works by measuring the rotation rate of a pulsar, which is a type of neutron star that emits regular pulses of electromagnetic radiation. The clock uses this rotation rate to keep track of time.

2. What is the mystery behind the slowing rotation in a spaceship?

The mystery behind the slowing rotation in a spaceship is known as the "twin paradox." This is a concept in relativity where time appears to pass slower for an object in motion compared to one at rest. This means that the pulsar clock on a spaceship will appear to run slower than a clock on Earth, leading to a discrepancy in the perceived passage of time.

3. How does the pulsar clock help solve this mystery?

The pulsar clock can help solve this mystery by providing a precise measurement of time that is not affected by the effects of motion. By comparing the time measured by the pulsar clock on the spaceship to a clock on Earth, scientists can better understand the concept of time dilation and the effects of motion on time.

4. What other applications does the pulsar clock have?

The pulsar clock has many other applications beyond solving the mystery of slowing rotation in a spaceship. It can be used for precise timekeeping in space exploration, navigation, and communication. It can also be used to study the behavior of pulsars and the properties of space-time.

5. How accurate is the pulsar clock?

The pulsar clock is incredibly accurate, with an error of only one nanosecond over a period of 100 years. This accuracy is due to the reliable and regular emission of pulses from pulsars, making them ideal timekeepers. However, the clock's accuracy can still be affected by other factors such as the distance between the pulsar and the observer.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
757
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
59
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
462
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Back
Top