Proving the Recursion Formula for $(x_n)$ Using Strong Induction

  • MHB
  • Thread starter KOO
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Induction
Then factor out a $2^k$ and a $3^{k-1}$.In summary, we are proving the closed form for the sequence $(x_n)$ given by $x_1 = 3, x_2 = 7,$ and $x_{n+1} = 5x_n - 6x_{n-1}$ for all $n\in\Bbb N$. We use induction to show that for all $n\in\Bbb N$, $x_n = 2^n + 3^{n-1}$. After verifying the base cases, we assume $x_k = 2^k + 3^{k-1}$ for some $k\in\
  • #1
KOO
19
0
Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence given by the following recursion formula:

$$x_1 = 3, x_2 = 7,\text{ and }x_{n+1} = 5x_n - 6x_{n-1}$$

Prove that for all $n\in\Bbb N$, $x_n = 2^n + 3^{n-1}$.

Attempt:

For $n = 1$, we have $2^1 + 3^0 = 3 = x_1$ TRUE
For $n = 2$, we have $2^2 + 3^1 = 7 = x_2$ TRUE

Assume $x_k = 2^k + 3^{k-1}$ for some $k\in\Bbb N$.

Now, for $n = k+1$:

$$\begin{align*}
x_{k+1} &= 5x_k - 6x_{k-1}\\
&= 5\left(2^k + 3^{k-1}\right) - 6\left(2^{k-1} + 3^{k-2}\right)
\end{align*}$$

What Next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you required to use induction, or did you choose to do so, because there is a much simpler way to derive the closed form for the recursion.
 
  • #3
MarkFL said:
Are you required to use induction, or did you choose to do so, because there is a much simpler way to derive the closed form for the recursion.

We are required to use induction.
 
  • #4
Okay as your next step, I would distribute on the right side, keeping in mind that $6=2\cdot3$.
 
  • #5


Next, we can simplify the expression by expanding the terms and combining like terms:

$$\begin{align*}
x_{k+1} &= 5\cdot 2^k + 5\cdot 3^{k-1} - 6\cdot 2^{k-1} - 6\cdot 3^{k-2}\\
&= 2\cdot 2^k + 3^{k} - 6\cdot 2^{k-1} - 2\cdot 3^{k-1} - 6\cdot 3^{k-2}\\
&= 2^{k+1} + 3^{k} - 3\cdot 2^{k} - 2\cdot 3^{k-1}\\
&= 2^{k+1} + 3^{k} - 3\cdot 2^{k} - 2\cdot 3^{k-1} + 2\cdot 2^{k} - 2\cdot 2^{k}\\
&= 2^{k+1} + 3^{k} - 2\cdot 2^{k} + 2\cdot 2^{k} - 2\cdot 3^{k} - 2\cdot 3^{k-1}\\
&= 2^{k+1} + 3^{k} - 2\cdot 3^{k}\\
&= 2^{k+1} + 3^{k+1-1}
\end{align*}$$

Therefore, we have shown that $x_{k+1} = 2^{k+1} + 3^{k}$, which completes the induction step. Thus, by strong induction, we can conclude that for all $n\in\Bbb N$, $x_n = 2^n + 3^{n-1}$. This proves the recursion formula for $(x_n)$.
 

Related to Proving the Recursion Formula for $(x_n)$ Using Strong Induction

What is strong induction?

Strong induction is a proof technique used in mathematics to prove that a statement is true for all natural numbers greater than or equal to a given number. It is also known as complete induction or course-of-values induction.

How does strong induction differ from regular induction?

In regular induction, we assume that a statement is true for a given number and then prove it for the next number. In strong induction, we assume that a statement is true for all numbers up to a given number and then prove it for the next number.

When is strong induction used?

Strong induction is used when proving statements about natural numbers, such as properties of sequences or series, divisibility, and combinatorial identities.

What is the basis step in strong induction?

The basis step in strong induction is to prove that the statement is true for the first value of the natural numbers, typically 0 or 1. This serves as the starting point for the induction process.

What is the induction hypothesis in strong induction?

The induction hypothesis in strong induction is the assumption that the statement is true for all natural numbers up to a given number, which is used to prove the statement for the next number.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
947
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
899
Replies
0
Views
502
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
749
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
777
Back
Top