Prove that linear operator is invertible

In summary, a linear operator is invertible if there exists another linear operator that can "undo" its effect, also known as its inverse. One way to prove that a linear operator is invertible is by showing that it is both one-to-one and onto. Proving that a linear operator is invertible is important in various applications and guarantees a unique solution. Yes, a linear operator can still be invertible even if it has a non-zero determinant. However, not all linear operators are invertible, as some are not bijective and therefore do not have an inverse.
  • #1
gruba
206
1

Homework Statement


Let [itex]\mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R^3}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^3}[/itex] is a linear operator defined as [itex]\mathcal{A}(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x_1+x_2-x_3, x_2+7x_3, -x_3)[/itex]
Prove that [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is invertible and find matrix of [itex]\mathcal{A},A^{-1}[/itex] in terms of canonical basis of [itex]\mathbb{R^3}[/itex].

Homework Equations


-Linear transformations
-Jordan decomposition

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Linear mapping can be written as
[tex]\mathcal{A}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \\
x_2 \\
x_3 \\
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1+x_2-x_3 \\
x_2+7x_3 \\
-x_3 \\
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]

Matrix of linear operator [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is [tex]T=

\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 \\
0 & 1 & 7 \\
0 & 0 & -1 \\
\end{bmatrix}

[/tex]

Using Jordan decomposition method, it is possible to find [itex]T,T^{-1}[/itex] in terms of canonical basis.

How to strictly prove that [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is invertible (without matrix computation)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
gruba said:

Homework Statement


Let [itex]\mathcal{A}: \mathbb{R^3}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^3}[/itex] is a linear operator defined as [itex]\mathcal{A}(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x_1+x_2-x_3, x_2+7x_3, -x_3)[/itex]
Prove that [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is invertible and find matrix of [itex]\mathcal{A},A^{-1}[/itex] in terms of canonical basis of [itex]\mathbb{R^3}[/itex].

Homework Equations


-Linear transformations
-Jordan decomposition

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Linear mapping can be written as
[tex]\mathcal{A}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \\
x_2 \\
x_3 \\
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1+x_2-x_3 \\
x_2+7x_3 \\
-x_3 \\
\end{bmatrix}
[/tex]

Matrix of linear operator [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is [tex]T=

\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1 \\
0 & 1 & 7 \\
0 & 0 & -1 \\
\end{bmatrix}

[/tex]

Using Jordan decomposition method, it is possible to find [itex]T,T^{-1}[/itex] in terms of canonical basis.

How to strictly prove that [itex]\mathcal{A}[/itex] is invertible (without matrix computation)?

This belongs in the "Precalculus" math forum, not the Advanced Physics forum.

Anyway, you do not need to use matrices in this problem: you just want to show that ##{\cal A}:\vec{x} \rightarrow \vec{y}## can be inverted, which means there is a map ##{\cal B}: \vec{y} \rightarrow \vec{x}## with the property that ##\vec{x} = {\cal B \, A} \vec{x}##. This amounts to simply solving the linear equations
[tex] x_1+x_2-x_3 =y_1, \: x_2+7x_3 = y_2, \: -x_3 = y_3 [/tex]
to determine the ##x_i## in terms of the ##y_j##. That is a simple high-school algebra exercise.
 

Related to Prove that linear operator is invertible

1. What does it mean for a linear operator to be invertible?

A linear operator is invertible if there exists another linear operator that can "undo" its effect, also known as its inverse. This means that when the original operator and its inverse are applied in succession, they cancel each other out and result in the identity operator.

2. How can I prove that a linear operator is invertible?

One way to prove that a linear operator is invertible is by showing that it is both one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective). This means that for every input, there is a unique output and for every possible output, there is at least one input. This can be demonstrated through various methods such as using the rank-nullity theorem or solving for the inverse matrix.

3. What is the importance of proving that a linear operator is invertible?

Proving that a linear operator is invertible is crucial in many areas of mathematics and applications. It allows us to solve systems of equations, compute determinants, and find solutions to differential equations. It also guarantees that the operator has a unique solution and can be "undone", making it a powerful tool in solving complex problems.

4. Can a linear operator be invertible if it has a non-zero determinant?

Yes, a linear operator can still be invertible even if it has a non-zero determinant. This is because the determinant only determines whether or not the operator has an inverse matrix. There are other ways to prove that a linear operator is invertible, such as showing that it is bijective, as mentioned in question 2.

5. Are all linear operators invertible?

No, not all linear operators are invertible. Some linear operators are not bijective, meaning they are not both one-to-one and onto, and therefore do not have an inverse. For example, the zero operator (which maps every vector to the zero vector) is not invertible since it cannot be "undone".

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
712
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
924
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
855
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
623
Back
Top