Potential from a Quadrupole using Legendre polynml's

Oh! and the 1's disappeared because of the -2 seen in the first postBut yeah... I keep reworking it and get 3/8 cos^2 for that last termSo then I get V = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o} r} * [ - \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{8r^2} cos^2( \theta)] In summary, a point-like linear quadrupole with charges placed at distance +a and -a from the origin
  • #1
Vapor88
24
0
1. Problem Statement:
There are charges of q placed at distance +a and -a from the origin on the z-axis. There is a charge at the origin of -2q. Express the potential of this point-like linear quadrupole in Legendre polynomials


The distance between origin and point is r, the distance between (0,0,a) and r is [tex]l[/tex] and the distance between (0,0,-a) is [tex]l'[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The potential can be expressed as
[tex](q/(4\pi r)*(1/l + 1/l' + 2/r)[/tex]

Using law of cosines

[tex]l = \sqrt{a^2 + r^2 - 2ar cos(\theta)}[/tex]
[tex]l' = \sqrt{a^2 + r^2 + 2ar cos(\theta)}[/tex]

Solving for 1/l and 1/l' gives
[tex]1/l = \frac{1}{r} (1 + a^2/r^2 - a/r cos (\theta))^{-1/2}[/tex]
[tex]1/l' = \frac{1}{r} (1 + a^2/r^2 + a/r cos (\theta))^{-1/2}[/tex]

that's supposed to be raised to the -0.5, but i don't know how to make it look right in latex

Now

[tex] V = ( \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o}} \frac{1}{r} [(1+( \frac{a}{r})^2 - \frac{a}{r} cos (\theta))^{-1/2} + (1+ (\frac{a}{r})^2 + \frac{a}{r} cos (\theta))^{-1/2} - 2] [/tex]

We had an example in class of a dipole that used the expansion

(1+x)^n = 1 + nx + ...

And only used the first two terms of it. Do I need to do the same thing to this, or can I go straight to the Legendre polynomials. I'm not sure where to go from here.

Also... If you take a^2/r^2 to go to zero, then the potential goes to zero as well. So I can't do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I just worked further into the problem, tried using that expansion the same way, don't know if I can really do that though.

But I took the a^2/r^2 + a/r cos (theta) = x

In the end, I did get something over r^3, which makes sense because it's a quadrupole, but I missed the point of the problem completely, using Legendre polynomials.
 
  • #3
The idea is to go straight to the Legendre polynomials using the well-known result

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2+a^2-2ar\cos\theta}}=\sum_{l=0}^\infty \frac{a^l}{r^{l+1}}P_l(\cos\theta)[/tex]

when a<r.
 
  • #4
Ok, so I got a bit further in the problem, he wants us to use the first three terms of binomial expansion, I only did the first two to get my results above, but they did not need Legendre polynomials. Though I do not know why my answer is incorrect. If I use the first three terms of the binomial expansion for both of the 1/(...)^1/2, then simplify, I end up with the following

[tex] \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o} r} * [ - \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{4r^2} cos^2( \theta)][/tex]

Now, my misunderstanding is in the Legendre polynomials. I know the definitions of Po P1 P2, etc. but I don't get how to apply them. I see that there is a cos^2 term, so I know that that's related to P2
[tex]P_{2} = \frac {(3x^{2}-1)}{2}[/tex]
[tex]P_{1} = x[/tex]
[tex]P_{0} = 1[/tex]

/edit... P2 is supposed to be (3x^2-1)/2

And I imagine that in those terms, I have x = cos (theta)

I'm just very sketchy on the details of Legendre polynomials. Everyone in my class had my professor for quantum, I haven't taken quantum yet, so he really did not spend much time explaining it. As I understand it, the first two terms in my equation get Po applied to them, but I don't know how to do this.
 
  • #5
You made a mistake in your algebra somewhere. The cos^2 term shouldn't have a 4 in the denominator.
 
  • #6
For
[tex] [1 + \frac{a^2}{r^2}- \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)]^{-1/2} [/tex]

I expand to get

[tex] [1 - \frac{1}{2} ( \frac{a^2}{r^2} - \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)) + \frac{- \frac{1}{2} (- \frac{1}{2} - 1)}{2!} ( \frac{a^4}{r^4} - \frac{2a^3}{r^3} cos( \theta) + \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta))][/tex]

Which gets simplified to[tex] [1 - \frac{1}{2} ( \frac{a^2}{r^2} - \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)) + \frac{3}{8} ( \frac{a^4}{r^4} - \frac{2a^3}{r^3} cos( \theta) + \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta))][/tex]

For the other term

[tex] [1 + \frac{a^2}{r^2}+ \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)]^{-1/2} [/tex]

When expanded, everything stays the same except all terms are positive

[tex] [1 - \frac{1}{2} ( \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)) + \frac{3}{8} ( \frac{a^4}{r^4} + \frac{2a^3}{r^3} cos( \theta) + \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta))][/tex]

then, when you add em together you get

[tex]V = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o} r} * [ - \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{4r^2} cos^2( \theta)][/tex]

...er there's still a 4 in the denominator... hrm

Oh! and the 1's disappeared because of the -2 seen in the first post

But yeah... I keep reworking it and get 3/8 + 3/8 = 3/4 for that last term
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Oh, you dropped the two way in the beginning. You wrote

[tex]1/l = [1 + \frac{a^2}{r^2} - \frac{a}{r} \cos(\theta)]^{-1/2}[/tex]

but it should be

[tex]1/l = [1 + \frac{a^2}{r^2} - 2 \frac{a}{r} \cos(\theta)]^{-1/2}[/tex]
 
  • #8
Ok, so I believe this is correct, however, I'm still stumped as far as legendre polynomials go. I have no idea how to implement them.

[tex]
V = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o} r} * [ - \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{4r^2} cos^2( \theta)]
[/tex]

Given this, I can see that it sort of looks like P2, but would that make it -1+1+3/2cos^2-1/2

This doesn't seem right at all.
 
  • #9
Vapor88 said:
Ok, so I believe this is correct, however, I'm still stumped as far as legendre polynomials go. I have no idea how to implement them.

[tex]
V = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{o} r} * [ - \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{4r^2} cos^2( \theta)]
[/tex]

Given this, I can see that it sort of looks like P2, but would that make it -1+1+3/2cos^2-1/2

This doesn't seem right at all.
How is this different from what you wrote before? You still have the four in the denominator of the cos^2 term that doesn't belong there.
 
  • #10
vela said:
How is this different from what you wrote before? You still have the four in the denominator of the cos^2 term that doesn't belong there.

It's not, but I keep reworking it and get that. here is the work for how I got there

[tex]
[1 - \frac{1}{2} ( \frac{a^2}{r^2} - \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)) + \frac{3}{8} ( \frac{a^4}{r^4} - \frac{2a^3}{r^3} cos( \theta) + \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta))]
[/tex]

Then you add that to

[tex]
[1 - \frac{1}{2} ( \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{a}{r} cos( \theta)) + \frac{3}{8} ( \frac{a^4}{r^4} + \frac{2a^3}{r^3} cos( \theta) + \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta))]
[/tex]

You can see what cancels out and what gets carried through. If those two equations are correct, then the cos^2 term's coefficient is 3/4

Working back further...

For the expansion:
The 3/8 comes from n(n-1)/2! where n = -1/2

The x^2 in the expansion's third term becomes this
[tex]
\frac{a^4}{r^4} + \frac {2a^3}{r^3} cos ( \theta) \frac{a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta)
[/tex]

The 1's in front get canceled by the 2 in the first post. All of the cos(theta) terms cancel. The 3/8 gets distributed to the cos^2 term in both of them, then when I add them together, I get 3/4. What coefficient am I supposed to be getting, then? If I am making an algebra mistake, I am still not seeing it. Can you please point it out, I've just reworked it three times, and gotten the same thing.
 
  • #11
Read post 7 in this thread.
 
  • #12
*facepalm*

thanks!
 
  • #13
Alrighty...

After banging my head on the desk, I've got the following.

[tex]
V = \frac{q}{4 \pi r \epsilon_{o}} [- \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{2r^2} cos^2( \theta)]
[/tex]

Now... to implement those Legendre polynomials.
 
  • #14
Ok, here's what I know of Legendre plynml's from my notes

They are integrals such that

[tex]
\int P_{l} (x) P_{m} (x)dx = 0
[/tex]

When l =/= m

When l = m, that integral is equal to
[tex]
\frac{2}{2l+1}
[/tex]

For this problem, I want to take x to be cos(theta)? Does that turn the first two terms into terms that can be handled with Po and the third with P2?
 
  • #15
Vapor88 said:
Alrighty...

After banging my head on the desk, I've got the following.

[tex]
V = \frac{q}{4 \pi r \epsilon_{o}} [- \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{2r^2} cos^2( \theta)]
[/tex]

Now... to implement those Legendre polynomials.

What is [itex]P_2(\cos\theta)[/itex]? How about [itex]P_0(\cos\theta)[/itex]?
 
  • #16
gabbagabbahey said:
What is [itex]P_2(\cos\theta)[/itex]? How about [itex]P_0(\cos\theta)[/itex]?

[tex]
P_{0} = 1
[/tex]

[tex]
P_{1} = cos ( \theta)
[/tex]

[tex]
P_{2} = \frac{3cos^2 ( \theta) - 1}{2}
[/tex]

I'm fairly confident that this is correct.

Are these my [tex]P_{l}[/tex] values? And would a^2/r^2 be Pm?

Does this mean that I'll have three integrals, all evaluated from -1 to 1, such that

[tex]

\int P_{l} (cos \theta) P_{m} (cos \theta)d(cos \theta) = 0

[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Vapor88 said:
[tex]
P_{0} = 1
[/tex]

[tex]
P_{1} = cos ( \theta)
[/tex]

[tex]
P_{2} = \frac{3cos^2 ( \theta) - 1}{2}
[/tex]

I'm fairly confident that this is correct.

Right. Now look at your expression for the potential..

[tex]V = \frac{q}{4 \pi r \epsilon_{o}} [- \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^4}{4r^4} + \frac{3a^2}{2r^2} cos^2( \theta)][/tex]

The first thing you should do is drop the [itex]\frac{a^4}{r^4}[/itex]. In your Taylor expansion, you are assuming that [itex]a[/itex] is very small compared to the distance from the origin at which you are measuring the potential. (If you don't make this assumption, you must keep all of the terms in the Taylor expansion) So, certainly [itex]\frac{a^4}{r^4}[/itex] should be much much smaller than [itex]\frac{a^2}{r^2}[/itex], right?

After that, you should notice that

[tex]- \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^2}{2r^2} cos^2( \theta)=\frac{a^2}{r^2}\left(\frac{3\cos^2\theta-1}{2}\right)- \frac{a^2}{2r^2}=\frac{a^2}{r^2}P_2(\cos\theta)+\frac{a^2}{2r^2}P_0(\cos\theta)=\frac{a^2}{r^2}\left(P_2(\cos\theta)+\frac{1}{2}P_0(\cos\theta)\right)[/tex]

Does this mean that I'll have three integrals, all evaluated from -1 to 1, such that

[tex]

\int P_{l} (cos \theta) P_{m} (cos \theta)d(cos \theta) = 0

[/tex]

What exactly are you planning on integrating?

Edit: You seem to have made an error in your Taylor expansion, to second order in [itex]\frac{a}{r}[/itex], I get

[tex]V\approx\frac{q}{4 \pi r \epsilon_0}\left[- \frac{a^2}{r^2} + \frac{3a^2}{r^2} cos^2( \theta)\right]=\frac{q}{2 \pi \epsilon_0}\left(\frac{a^2}{r^3}\right)P_2(\cos\theta)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #18
What am I planning on integrating? lol... I'm not really sure, I'm very, very shaky on these legendre polynomials, they're completely new to me, but everyone else in my class is familiar with them.

Anyways, I see from there, when plugged into the potential equation, I get an r^-3, which is expected in quadrupoles. Is further work necessary?
 
  • #19
I used the binomial expansion, not the Taylor expansion... They are different, right?
 
  • #20
Vapor88 said:
I used the binomial expansion, not the Taylor expansion... They are different, right?

[tex]a^2+r^2\pm2ar\cos\theta[/tex] is a trinomial, not a binomial. You should use a Taylor expansion instead.
 
  • #21
Vapor88 said:
I used the binomial expansion, not the Taylor expansion... They are different, right?
The binomial expansion of (1+x)1/2 is the Taylor expansion of (1+x)1/2 about x=0.
 

Related to Potential from a Quadrupole using Legendre polynml's

What is a quadrupole potential?

A quadrupole potential is a type of electrostatic potential that arises from the distribution of charges in a system. It is characterized by two pairs of equal and opposite charges, with each pair being separated by a fixed distance.

How is the quadrupole potential calculated?

The quadrupole potential can be calculated using Legendre polynomials, which are a set of orthogonal polynomials commonly used in mathematical physics. The Legendre polynomials are used to expand the potential function in terms of the charges and their positions.

What are Legendre polynomials?

Legendre polynomials are a family of polynomials that are solutions to a specific type of differential equation known as Legendre's differential equation. They are commonly used in mathematical physics to solve problems involving spherical symmetry.

What is the physical significance of the Legendre polynomials in the quadrupole potential?

The Legendre polynomials have a physical significance in the quadrupole potential as they represent the shape and orientation of the charges in the system. The higher order polynomials correspond to more complex charge distributions and contribute to the overall shape of the potential.

What are some applications of the quadrupole potential using Legendre polynomials?

The quadrupole potential using Legendre polynomials has various applications in physics, such as in studying the electric fields of molecules and ions, as well as in understanding the behavior of ions in mass spectrometry. It is also used in modeling the gravitational potential of galaxies and in analyzing the polarization of electromagnetic radiation in astrophysics.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
796
Back
Top