Poisson equation for the field of an electron

[Keonn]

Homework Statement

In classical electrodynamics, the scalar field [itex]\phi(r)[/itex] produced by an electron located at the origin is given by the Poisson equation
[itex]\nabla^2\phi(r) = -4\pi e\delta(r)[/itex]

Show that the radial dependence of the field is given by
[itex]\phi(r) = \frac er[/itex]

Homework Equations

I'm not really sure if this is right, but this is what I found on wikipedia. I've never learned about this ∇^2 thing in a math class.
[itex]\nabla^2 \phi =\frac {\partial^2 \phi}{\partial r^2} + \frac 1r \frac {\partial \phi}{\partial r}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution

Plugging in e/r for phi, you get:
[itex]\nabla^2 \phi = \frac {2e}{r^3} - \frac {e}{r^3} = \frac {e}{r^3}[/itex]
which isn't even close to the equation given in the problem. I am so lost, please help.

 

[BvU]

What you found looks more like the ##\nabla^2## in polar coordinates (2D). In the same encyclopaedia I found (here) something else for three dimensions -- more like the world where electrons manifest themselves. With spherical symmetry you can focus on the r part.

You also want to think what you want to do with the ##\delta## function. It has a nice habit of being integrable (if that's an existing word). And then there is a famous theorem to link E on a surface to charge enclosed (named after a German named Carl Friedrich).

But perhaps there is a more direct route.

 

[Goddar]

I've never learned about this ∇^2 thing in a math class.

Hi. This is a bit of a problem because the Laplacian is usually covered in Calculus III, which would be a pre-requisite for E&M... You would also need to know about the three major theorems of 3-dimensions calculus (gradient, divergence and curl), and finally about multi-dimensional delta-functions and how to express them in non-cartesian coordinates.
If you don't know about these, it's going to be a long way for you to derive the relation you are given. I can outline the first steps:
1 - express the delta-function in spherical coordinates (by the way, your equation should read δ³(r), not δ(r))
2 - express the Laplacian as ∇⋅∇Φ, then use the theorem for gradients to integrate over all space.
The whole derivation takes four lines, but you really need to know about 3-dimensional calculus...

 

[Brian T]

∇² is equivalent the divergence of the gradient of a scalar function ƒ: ∇⋅∇(ƒ).
I suggest reading about gradient and divergence if you're not familiar with these (plenty of sources online)

To provide a brief intro:
∇ (aka del or nabla operator) can be denoted [itex] <\frac{∂}{∂x_1}, \frac{∂}{∂x_2}, ..., \frac{∂}{∂x_n}> [/itex]. Note there is no function following the ∂ in the numerator.

Let ƒ be a function ƒ(x₁, x₂, ..., x_n) = ξ, where ξ is a scalar
The Gradient ∇ƒ maps the output of ƒ on ℝ to ℝⁿ (Think scalar f multiplied by vector ∇)
∇ƒ = [itex] <\frac{∂ξ}{∂x_1}, \frac{∂ξ}{∂x_2}, ..., \frac{∂ξ}{∂x_n}> [/itex]

Let ϑ be a function ϑ(x₁, x₂, ..., x_n) = [itex]<ϑ_1, ϑ_2, ..., ϑ_n>[/itex]
The Divergence ∇⋅ϑ maps the output of some function on ℝⁿ to ℝ (Think dot product of ∇ and ϑ)
∇⋅ϑ = [itex] \frac{∂ϑ}{∂x_1} + \frac{∂ϑ}{∂x_2} + ... + \frac{∂ϑ}{∂x_n} [/itex]

If we apply both to the first function ƒ(X) = ξ, where ∇(ƒ) = ϑ, we map the output on ℝ, to ℝⁿ and back to ℝ
∇⋅∇(ƒ) = [itex] \frac{∂^2ξ}{∂x_1^2} + \frac{∂^2ξ}{∂x_2^2} + ... + \frac{∂^2ξ}{∂x_n^2} [/itex]
// as a note, ∇⋅∇ is more commonly written ∇² or Δ, known as the Laplacian