Mistake in proof of gravitational potential equation?

In summary, the student is trying to derive an equation for the gravitational potential, but is having difficulty understanding the concepts. He has correctly converted the equation to calculate the work done by external forces, but is having difficulty understanding why the text specifies both the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp and the distance between M and Mp as r. He has found an equation that represents the gravitational potential energy as -GM/r, but is still having trouble understanding why the text specifies both the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp and the distance between M and Mp as r. He can approximate the work done over the entire path using a series of Riemann sums, and eventually arrives at the answer -
  • #1
dotcom
17
0
mistake in proof of gravitational potential equation?

Hi, I have a problem in deriving an equation for the gravitational potential.

Well, I think that the graviational potential is the work done by external forces in moving a unit mass Mp from infinity to that point through distance d, and so I converted the equation in this way:

when M is the mass of a planet creating the gravitational field and r is the distance between M and Mp,

V= (work done) / (mass)
=F.d / Mp
=(G*M*Mp/r^2)*d/ Mp

... and I got nowhere.

However, my text states that the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp should be r as well. So the text says that

V= (work done) / (mass)
=F.r / Mp
=(G*M*Mp/r^2)*r/ Mp

and in this way the correct equation, V=-GM/r (negative sign is added afterwards) shows up.

But I don't understand why the text can set both the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp and the distance between M and Mp as r.

To make the problem more complicated, my teacher has said that there might be a typo or two in the text, which makes the understanfing very difficult. So it might be included in this context, I don't know...

If anyone could explain me this, please help me by doing so...
I would really really appreciate your advise!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're on the right track and I think I see area of confusion,

it is much easier to understand using integration where force is expressed as function of distance and integrated from lower limit of infinity to upper limit of R.
But since at infinity Force is zero, this simplifies to

0-GMm/r^2*r see here if this is illegible:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/gpot.html#ui
 
  • #3
I was responding to this earlier and the electricty went down on me!

dotcom said:
Hi, I have a problem in deriving an equation for the gravitational potential.

Well, I think that the graviational potential is the work done by external forces in moving a unit mass Mp from infinity to that point through distance d, and so I converted the equation in this way:

when M is the mass of a planet creating the gravitational field and r is the distance between M and Mp,

V= (work done) / (mass)
=F.d / Mp
=(G*M*Mp/r^2)*d/ Mp
... and I got nowhere.
Work = F*d only for constant force. For a variable force, as here you need an integral. (If your textbook talks about the gravitational potential energy, surely it mentions integration? You don't say whether you know anything about Calculus.) Technically, you should integrate along the path the object actually takes. Fortunately, since gravitational force is "conservative", the work done moving from one point to another along ANY path depends only on the endpoints not on the particular path. By convention, gravitational potential energy is taken to be 0 at infinity so we can take the integral from infinity to R where R is the FINAL distance from M to Mp.

However, my text states that the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp should be r as well. So the text says that

V= (work done) / (mass)
=F.r / Mp
=(G*M*Mp/r^2)*r/ Mp

and in this way the correct equation, V=-GM/r (negative sign is added afterwards) shows up.
Since the mass is MOVING, r, the distance from Mp to M changes. Use a different value, say R as I said abovee, to represent the distance between M and Mp in its FINAL position, the point at which you are finding the potential. In moving from "infinity" to its final distance from M, r changes from infinity to R.

But I don't understand why the text can set both the distance from the infinity to the point mass Mp and the distance between M and Mp as r.
It's not. r is always the distance between M and Mp but as the mass moves that distance changes from "infinity" to R.

To make the problem more complicated, my teacher has said that there might be a typo or two in the text, which makes the understanfing very difficult. So it might be included in this context, I don't know...

If anyone could explain me this, please help me by doing so...
I would really really appreciate your advise!
The force at any distance, r, from M is -GMpM/r2. If it moves a SHORT distance [itex]\delta r[/itex], so the force doesn't change much, the work done there is about [itex](-GMpM/r^2)\delta r[/itex]. To approximate the work over the entire path, add for each little step along the path (that's what's known as a Riemann sum). Taking the limit as you make each step smaller and smaller (and have more and more steps) that becomes the integral that gives the exact value:
[tex]-GM \int_{-\infty}^R \frac{dr}{r^2}[/tex]
 
  • #4
thanks Hall for adding rigor, and doing a darn good job of explaining integration in a couple of paragraphs. Thats the problem of doing math w/o calculus, its like trying to build a house without blueprints.
 

Related to Mistake in proof of gravitational potential equation?

1. What is the gravitational potential equation?

The gravitational potential equation is a mathematical equation that describes the potential energy of an object in a gravitational field. It is typically represented as V = mgh, where V is the potential energy, m is the mass of the object, g is the gravitational acceleration, and h is the height of the object.

2. What is a mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation?

A common mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation is assuming that the gravitational potential is constant throughout a system. In reality, the gravitational potential changes with distance from the source of the gravitational field and must be integrated over the entire system to accurately calculate the potential energy.

3. How does the mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation affect its accuracy?

The mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation can significantly affect its accuracy as it does not take into account the varying potential energy throughout a system. This can lead to incorrect calculations and predictions of gravitational potential and potential energy.

4. What are some consequences of using the incorrect gravitational potential equation?

Using an incorrect gravitational potential equation can result in incorrect calculations of potential energy, which can have consequences in various fields such as astrophysics, engineering, and navigation. It can also lead to incorrect predictions and models of gravitational forces and their effects on objects.

5. How can the mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation be avoided?

The mistake in the proof of the gravitational potential equation can be avoided by using the correct equation, which involves integrating the varying potential over the entire system. Additionally, double-checking calculations and considering the limitations of the equation can help avoid errors and ensure more accurate results.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
690
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
418
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
857
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
200
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top