Microwave Propulsion: Using RF to Push Magnetic Fields

In summary, a JPL engineer confirmed that radio energy cannot affect a magnetic field. However, the speaker questions why microwaves, which cause bipolar molecules to vibrate through the electric and magnetic fields of atoms, cannot be used to push objects with a magnetic field. The engineer explains that both electric and magnetic fields exist in RF fields, but they are weak and can interact with objects, such as a radio antenna.
  • #1
Squeeze
21
0
I once asked a JPL engineer if radio energy could affect a magnetic field, his answer was just plain no. But I have a problem with microwave RF affecting bipolar molecules. I mean microwaves cause these molecules to vibrate and they do so because the RF affects the electric and magnetic fields of the atoms. So why can't RF be used to push something that has a magnetic field, similar to the vibration effect of microwaves?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
RF fields have an E and a H field
the E field is electric, the H field is magnetic.
They are both weak, but they do exist, and they interact with things (like your radio's antenna)
 
  • #3


It is possible that the JPL engineer was referring specifically to using radio energy to directly manipulate a magnetic field, rather than the indirect effect of microwaves on molecules. However, your point about the vibration effect of microwaves on molecules is valid. In fact, this is the basis for microwave propulsion, where microwaves are used to heat a propellant, causing molecules to vibrate and generate thrust. This concept has been successfully demonstrated in laboratory experiments and is being explored as a potential propulsion method for spacecraft. So, while it may not be feasible to directly manipulate a magnetic field with radio energy, the use of microwaves to induce molecular vibrations and generate thrust is a promising avenue for propulsion research.
 

Related to Microwave Propulsion: Using RF to Push Magnetic Fields

1. How does microwave propulsion work?

Microwave propulsion uses microwaves, which are a type of electromagnetic radiation, to create a magnetic field. This field then interacts with a conductive material, such as a metal plate, and pushes it in the opposite direction of the microwaves. This creates thrust, allowing the object to move forward.

2. What are the potential applications of microwave propulsion?

Microwave propulsion has potential applications in space travel, specifically for small satellites and spacecraft. It can also be used for deep space exploration, as it is more efficient than traditional chemical propulsion systems.

3. How efficient is microwave propulsion compared to other forms of propulsion?

Microwave propulsion is more efficient than traditional chemical propulsion systems, which require a large amount of fuel. It is also more efficient than ion thrusters, which are commonly used in space travel. However, it is not as efficient as nuclear propulsion.

4. What are the potential challenges and limitations of microwave propulsion?

One potential challenge of microwave propulsion is the need for a large power source, which can be difficult to provide in space. There are also potential safety concerns, as microwaves can be harmful to humans and other living organisms. Additionally, there may be limitations on the size and weight of objects that can be propelled using this method.

5. What are the current advancements and research in the field of microwave propulsion?

Currently, there is ongoing research and development in the field of microwave propulsion, with a focus on improving efficiency and finding ways to scale the technology for larger objects. There are also efforts to address safety concerns and explore potential applications beyond space travel, such as in the medical and transportation industries.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
627
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
811
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
995
  • Electrical Engineering
3
Replies
73
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top