Learn about Dimensional Regularization

In summary, the conversation is discussing the topic of Dimensional Regularization for the electron self energy and the best resources to learn about it. One person recommends the book "Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Michael E. Peskin, while another suggests that "Quantum fields and strings : a course for mathematicians" by IAS may be more suitable for a deeper understanding. The original poster is looking for a reference specifically on the application of D.R to the electron self energy and finding "delta m". There is also a discussion on the suitability and difficulty level of Peskin's book for beginners.
  • #1
DMESONS
27
0
Hi guys,

I want to learn about Dimensional Regularization for the electron self energy. Can you help by providing me the best book or notes for this purpose”it's a self study”?

Thanks for you help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Alhakami said:
Hi guys,

I want to learn about Dimensional Regularization for the electron self energy. Can you help by providing me the best book or notes for this purpose”it's a self study”?

Thanks for you help.

You can see the an introdution to quantum field theory (Michael E. Peskin)
 
  • #3


Recommending Peskin is like saying the best book to learn english is the phone directory ...

The current best textbook on QFT is probably by Mark Srednicki.
 
  • #4


smallphi said:
That's like saying the best book to learn english is the phonebook ...
  • wlln did not say Peskin's book is the best
  • Peskin is certainly more popular than Srednicki's, at least today and until that changes your comment is nothing but advertising
  • Comparing Peskin's book to a phonebook is franckly offending. From the very book YOU quote "I (that is your favorite author) would not want to be without my well-worn copies of [2 books and then] Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Michael E. Peskin".
  • There is no clear reason why this book should be popular. It is neither technical nor conceptual. I'd be better off with my copy of Peskin's and Zee's than buying yet another book which does less than the combination of the two others, each one clearly dedicated to being complete in its own goal.
 
  • #5


"Popularity" i.e. what is considered 'standard textbook' in the american curricula often doesn't correlate with pedagogical qualities. It's enough to compare the reviews on Amazon.com on Peskin and on Srednicki to understand why Srednicki is the choice for a student that actually want to understand QFT vs. Peskin for student that wants to be 'informed'. I frankly don't care what Srednicki said about Peskin's book, I've had a course that used Peskin and it's simply a phone book that won't enlighten any beginner - even elementary topics properly discussed in other books sound 'mysterious' in Peskin cause the book is too busy to 'cover' lots of material than explain it understandably with necessary details to a beginner. Of course Srednicki is not going to bash the competition, that is considered unprofessional, but why write a whole new textbook if Peskin is so damn good ? LOL. I on the other hand am free to express my opinion based on my practical experience with Peskin - don't bother buying it ...

By the way Srednicki has a free pdf online so you don't have to waste any money on it.
 
Last edited:
  • #6


smallphi said:
"Popularity" i.e. what is considered 'standard textbook' in the american curricula
I have not undergone such a thing as american curriculum. When I say popular, I am talking about the use among professionals. Just walk around in the offices, and you can see for yourself. Your personal opinion has little weight against that, and the reason I reacted to your post is that you called Peskin's work a "phonebook", which I consider insulting. Maybe it is too difficult for you, and you are indeed free to express it.
 
  • #7


By 'phonebook' I mean a reference book like MTW in gravity. If you do research in the field, you often check stuff in those books, but they are totally unsuited for beginners that need the most basic conceptual layers covered carefully and in detail. This thread is about pedagogical books for beginners not popular references for professionals.

Peskin is still used as the main text for grad courses in QFT, something I find as ridiculous as for example using "Handbook of Mathematical Functions" by Abramowitz and Stegun to teach math classes lol. Peskin is simply a comprehensive overview and reference but a textbook for beginners or 'Introduction to QFT' it's simply not.
 
Last edited:
  • #8


smallphi said:
they are totally unsuited for beginners that need the most basic conceptual layers covered carefully and in detail. This thread is about pedagogical books for beginners not popular references for professionals.
Well, since you like so much to give your personal opinion, I'll give mine. I studied and introduced myself to QFT with Weinberg's books, which is even more in-depth than Peskin's. Peskin is far from being "difficult". Difficult books on QFT would be for instance at the level of the QFT part of "Quantum fields and strings : a course for mathematicians" in two volumes by IAS. That would be a technical reference professionals would call "phonebook" and not recommand for an introduction.

The level of Peskin is well-suited to study seriously a field you would intend to actually understand and contribute to. If you find it too difficult, I see either you are studying too early because you lack basis for it, or you are not suited to become a professional. This is just my personal opinion.
 
  • #9


How exactly you know Peskin is 'well suited for study' when you learned from Weinberg? I tried to study from Peskin, and by the way I was in the top 5% of the class. I always ended up reading another book and then understanding stuff that Peskin should have explained.

Bottom line is, if you want to repeat like a parrot stuff you don't understand neither conceptually nor in mathematical details, read Peskin. If you really want to achieve deep understanding of the same stuff, read Srednicki. And that is my 'personal opinion' as well as the opinion of Amazon.com reviewers that are beginners like me, not professionals.
 
Last edited:
  • #10


smallphi said:
I was in the top 5% of the class.
What percentage of this class per year produces professional ? I don't wish to argue on that anymore, I said what I had to say.
 
  • #11


Dear walln

Thanks for your reply. I have used this book. My question is about the Dimensional Regularization”D.R”, I need a reference such as a book or notes to get full understanding. Pekin did use this technique only for the photon self energy and I don’t know how can we apply this technique to the electron self energy and find “delta m”.Dears “samallphi, and humanino”

I enjoy reading your comments. You’re very innovative “this is my personal opinion :smile:

Honestly, this is the first time I heard about Srednicki book. I will try to get it.

Thanks for your discussion.
 
  • #12


I certainly don't mean to kick you out of here, but there is right now a discussion about [thread=244928]dimensional regularization[/thread] in the "Quantum physics" sub-forum. If you have access to an account you can even download right now "Introduction to the technique of dimensional regularization" by George Leibbrandt in Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 849 - 876 (1975), a link being given there.
 
  • #13


Thanks for your concern.
 

Related to Learn about Dimensional Regularization

1. What is dimensional regularization?

Dimensional regularization is a mathematical technique used in theoretical physics and quantum field theory to deal with divergent integrals that arise in calculations. It involves extending the number of dimensions in which a calculation is performed, typically from three spatial dimensions to a higher number, and then taking the limit back to the desired number of dimensions.

2. Why is dimensional regularization used?

Dimensional regularization is used because it provides a systematic method for dealing with infinities that appear in calculations in quantum field theory. These infinities are a result of the mathematical formalism used to describe particle interactions, and can be removed through the use of dimensional regularization.

3. How does dimensional regularization work?

Dimensional regularization works by introducing a parameter, often denoted as d, that represents the number of dimensions in which a calculation is being performed. This parameter is then used to modify the integrals in the calculation, allowing for the removal of infinities. After the calculation is completed, the limit is taken as d approaches the desired number of dimensions, typically three.

4. What are the advantages of dimensional regularization?

Dimensional regularization has several advantages over other methods of dealing with infinities in quantum field theory calculations. It is a more systematic and consistent approach, and it preserves important symmetries that can be broken by other methods. It also allows for easier calculations and avoids the need for ad hoc renormalization procedures.

5. Are there any limitations to dimensional regularization?

While dimensional regularization is a powerful and widely used technique, it does have some limitations. It is most effective for calculations involving renormalizable theories, and can encounter difficulties when applied to non-renormalizable theories. Additionally, it may not always provide physically meaningful results, and in those cases, other methods may need to be used.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
707
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
5
Views
588
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
688
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top