Kinetic Energy and Rolling motion

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of kinetic energy for a rolling can using the formula K = (1/2)*I*(v/r)^2. There is confusion regarding the use of this formula and the correct values for the variables, as well as the difference between solid and hollow cylinders and the axis of rotation. The final calculated values for the kinetic energy are 0.5 J for the first problem and 1.35 J for the second problem.
  • #1
Nitrag
11
0
A 500g, 8.0-cm-diameter can rolls across the floor at 1.0 m/s. What's the can's kinetic energy.

I solved this using:

Code:
K = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]*I*([tex]\frac{v}{r}[/tex])[tex]^{2}[/tex]

and for some reason I get 1/3 the answer. So I multiplied it by 3 at the end. Is there something wrong with the formula I'm using?


If i do the same thing with a similar problem I don't get the right answer. I think the difference lies in the 1.50 m/s.

Similar problem:
Code:
A 600 g, 6.50-cm-diameter solid cylinder rolls across the floor at 1.50 m/s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you show the formula u used for I(in terms of r) ?
 
  • #3
Oops sry,

I = (.5*m*r^2)
 
  • #4
This is the value of I about COM, the cylinder is not rolling about the COM.
 
  • #5
Since the can is hollow, you must know the inner and outer diameter of the can to find the MI.
 
  • #6
If the walls of the can are very small, the moment of inertia = MR^2
 
  • #7
Hey karnataki, specify the axis (coz here I is 3/2MR^2)
 
  • #8
Moment of inertia of a hollow cylinder about the axis parallel to the axis of cylinder is = M(R1^2 + R2^2)/2
If the can is thin, in that case R1 is nearly equal to R2.
and MI = MR^2. You have taken the axis tangential to the cylinder and parallel to the axis of the cylinder.
 
  • #9
Thats the axis along which pure rotation is taking place, I suppose.
 
  • #10
K.E. of rolling can = 1/2*I(com)(v/r)^2 + 1/2*Mv(com)^2
= 1/2*Mr^2(v/r)^2 + 1/2*Mv(com)^2
= 1/2*Mv^2 +1/2*Mv^2
= Mv^2
In such problems radius of the object is not needed.
 
  • #11
Hey I(com) = 1/2Mr^2.
 
  • #12
Just mv^2 does not work.My buddy has a different values and he got 0.443 for the question:
Code:
A 500g, 8.0-cm-diameter can rolls across the floor at 1.0 m/s. What's the can's kinetic energy.
 
  • #13
I (com) = 1/2(MR^2) is true for solid cylinder.

Total KE of rolling body = KE of translation + KE of rotaion
If possible go through Halliday & Resnic Book of Physics
 
  • #14
Oh ya, I'm sorry for the confusion.
So, K = Mv^2 = 0.5 * (1)^2 = 0.5 J

and for the other ques. K = 0.6 * (1.5)^2 = 1.35 J
Are your numerical values same, Nitrag?
 
  • #15
Sourabh N said:
Oh ya, I'm sorry for the confusion.
So, K = Mv^2 = 0.5 * (1)^2 = 0.5 J

and for the other ques. K = 0.6 * (1.5)^2 = 1.35 J
Are your numerical values same, Nitrag?

Yes, I got 1.35 J also but it is not correct.
 
  • #16
For the other question K = 1/2*1/2*(MR^2)(V/R)^2 + 1/2*MV^2
= 1/4MV^2 + 1/2MV^2 =3/4MV^2 = 1.0125 J
 
  • #17
ah, I see the connection now. thanks for the help!
 

Related to Kinetic Energy and Rolling motion

1. What is kinetic energy?

Kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. It is calculated by multiplying the mass of the object by the square of its velocity and dividing by 2.

2. How is kinetic energy related to rolling motion?

When an object is rolling, it possesses both rotational and translational kinetic energy. The rotational kinetic energy is due to the object's rotation around its axis, while the translational kinetic energy is due to its linear motion. The total kinetic energy of the object is the sum of these two energies.

3. What is the difference between static and dynamic rolling friction?

Static rolling friction refers to the resistance an object experiences when it is in a stationary position and begins to roll. Dynamic rolling friction, on the other hand, refers to the resistance an object experiences while already in motion and rolling.

4. How does the radius of a rolling object affect its kinetic energy?

The larger the radius of a rolling object, the more kinetic energy it will possess. This is because the larger radius allows the object to cover more distance per revolution, resulting in a higher velocity and thus, a higher kinetic energy.

5. Can rolling motion be considered as a form of conservation of energy?

Yes, rolling motion can be considered a form of conservation of energy. This is because the kinetic energy of the object is constantly being converted between potential energy and kinetic energy as the object rolls up and down inclines or over obstacles.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
963
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
646
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
295
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
711
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
211
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
499
Back
Top