- #1
Karmo
Could somebody explain me if there's a theory, axiom, law or something that can refuse the possibility of "Cold Fusion" in experimental basis?
Thanks a lot.
Karmo
Thanks a lot.
Karmo
Karmo said:Could somebody explain me if there's a theory, axiom, law or something that can refuse the possibility of "Cold Fusion" in experimental basis?
Thanks a lot.
Karmo
Proposed mechanisms
Many years after the 1989 experiment, cold fusion researchers still haven't agreed on a single theoretical explanation or on a single experimental method that can produce replicable results and continue to offer new proposals, which haven't convinced mainstream scientists.
Cold fusion is a hypothesized form of nuclear reaction in which two light atomic nuclei fuse together at or near room temperature, releasing a large amount of energy.
No, cold fusion has not been proven to be a viable source of energy. While there have been some studies and experiments that have shown promising results, the scientific community as a whole has not been able to replicate these findings consistently.
If cold fusion were to be proven to be a viable source of energy, the potential benefits would include a nearly limitless supply of clean and renewable energy, as well as a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and reliance on fossil fuels.
Some potential drawbacks of cold fusion include the difficulty in achieving and maintaining the necessary conditions for the fusion reaction to occur, the potential for radioactive byproducts, and the high costs associated with research and development of this technology.
Yes, there is ongoing research and development in the field of cold fusion. While it is not a widely accepted scientific concept, there are still scientists and organizations working to further understand and potentially harness this process for energy production.