Is There a Scientific Explanation for the Controversial Concept of Cold Fusion?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of cold fusion and whether or not there is a theory or law that can disprove its existence. While there is no consensus among cold fusion researchers, some still believe that the phenomenon is real and may be explained by a combination of physical effects not yet included in current theoretical models. However, further research and well-executed experiments are needed to determine the validity of cold fusion.
  • #1
Karmo
Could somebody explain me if there's a theory, axiom, law or something that can refuse the possibility of "Cold Fusion" in experimental basis?

Thanks a lot.

Karmo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Karmo said:
Could somebody explain me if there's a theory, axiom, law or something that can refuse the possibility of "Cold Fusion" in experimental basis?

Thanks a lot.

Karmo

The way I interpret the following:

Proposed mechanisms
Many years after the 1989 experiment, cold fusion researchers still haven't agreed on a single theoretical explanation or on a single experimental method that can produce replicable results and continue to offer new proposals, which haven't convinced mainstream scientists.

is that no one knows how to do it.

I'm not sure you can prove that it can't be done, which is probably why Sidney Kimmel provided a $5.5 million grant to fund its research in 2012.
 
  • Like
Likes Karmo
  • #3
OP, you are asking the wrong question. A theory can NEVER invalidate an experimental outcome. If a theoretical model is inconsistent with an experimental fact, that means that either the model is wrong, used outside its domain of applicability, or someone applying the model made an error or has failed to include all relevant physical effects. It is impossible to disprove an experiment with a theory.

Of course, if an experiment is incompatible with well-established theoretical expectations (in this case: that in room-temperature matter it is very unlikely that enough energy can be concentrated in a single point to initiate a nuclear reaction), it should better be very well executed and evaluated. And this is precisely what did not happen in the cold fusion case, which has lead to the sorry state the field is in. But a few physicists still believe the effects are real (there even are still conferences on "low energy nuclear reactions", how the field is called, nowadays). And who knows? Maybe they turn out to be right in the end, and some strange combination of physical effects no one thought of before (and thus did not include in her theoretical model!) actually can initiate the reactions.
 
  • Like
Likes akashpandey, Karmo and Drakkith
  • #4
I think CGK's post is a good way to end the thread. Unfortunately cold fusion is a banned topic here on PF, even for the purposes of refuting it. Thread locked.
 

Related to Is There a Scientific Explanation for the Controversial Concept of Cold Fusion?

What is cold fusion?

Cold fusion is a hypothesized form of nuclear reaction in which two light atomic nuclei fuse together at or near room temperature, releasing a large amount of energy.

Has cold fusion been proven to be a viable source of energy?

No, cold fusion has not been proven to be a viable source of energy. While there have been some studies and experiments that have shown promising results, the scientific community as a whole has not been able to replicate these findings consistently.

What are the potential benefits of cold fusion?

If cold fusion were to be proven to be a viable source of energy, the potential benefits would include a nearly limitless supply of clean and renewable energy, as well as a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and reliance on fossil fuels.

What are the potential drawbacks of cold fusion?

Some potential drawbacks of cold fusion include the difficulty in achieving and maintaining the necessary conditions for the fusion reaction to occur, the potential for radioactive byproducts, and the high costs associated with research and development of this technology.

Is there ongoing research and development in the field of cold fusion?

Yes, there is ongoing research and development in the field of cold fusion. While it is not a widely accepted scientific concept, there are still scientists and organizations working to further understand and potentially harness this process for energy production.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
929
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top