Is Max Born Ignoring the Electric Field that Produces Current in his Theory?

In summary, in his book "Einstein's Theory of Relativity", Max Born discusses the concept of a wire with a current in it being electrically neutral and surrounded by a magnetic field on page 297. However, on page 161, he also states that the current in a wire is the result of an electric field. This suggests that the wire on page 297 is actually in an electric field, contrary to what was previously stated. The context on page 297 is further explained as the electrical charge seen by an observer moving relative to the wire, which produces an electric field around the wire. It is possible that for the sake of discussion, Born ignores the electric field that produces the current in order to focus on the electric field
  • #1
GregAshmore
221
0
I'm reading Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity", 1962 version. On page 297 he says that a wire with a current in it is electrically neutral and surrounded by only a magnetic field.

Yet on page 161 he says that current in a wire is the result of an electric field.

It would seem that the wire on page 297, with its electric current, must be in an electric field.

What am I missing?

The context on page 297 is the electrical charge which is seen by an observer moving relative to the wire. That charge produces an electric field around the wire. Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
GregAshmore said:
Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
Exactly.
 
  • #3
Thanks.
 

Related to Is Max Born Ignoring the Electric Field that Produces Current in his Theory?

1. What is "Confused reading Max Born"?

Confused reading Max Born is a common phenomenon experienced by readers when they struggle to understand the complex concepts and theories presented in the works of physicist Max Born, particularly his book "The Born-Einstein Letters". It can also refer to the confusion that arises when trying to reconcile Born's theories with those of other physicists.

2. Why is "Confused reading Max Born" a common problem?

Max Born was a renowned physicist who made significant contributions to the fields of quantum mechanics and matrix mechanics. His works are highly technical and can be difficult for non-experts to understand. Additionally, his ideas often challenged traditional beliefs and were not easily accepted, leading to further confusion.

3. How can one overcome "Confused reading Max Born"?

One way to overcome "Confused reading Max Born" is to have a strong background in physics and mathematics. This will provide a better understanding of the concepts and theories presented by Born. It is also helpful to read other works by contemporary physicists to gain a broader perspective on the subject.

4. Are there any resources available to help with "Confused reading Max Born"?

Yes, there are several resources available to help with "Confused reading Max Born". These include online forums and discussion groups where readers can ask questions and receive explanations from experts. There are also books and articles that offer simplified explanations of Born's theories and their implications.

5. Is "Confused reading Max Born" a common problem among scientists?

Yes, "Confused reading Max Born" is a common problem among scientists, especially those who are not well-versed in the fields of quantum mechanics and matrix mechanics. Even experts in these fields can sometimes struggle to fully understand Born's ideas and theories, as they often challenge traditional beliefs and require a deep understanding of complex mathematical concepts.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top