- #1
jmfrank63
For work I am a technical support engineer, who solves all sorts of customer problems.
I do physics for fun, not for living.
From J.J Thomson 1904, to Rutherford 1911, Bohr 1913 and Mulliken 1932 the atomic model underwent four major changes (including its creation)
The more I read and learn about the latest state, the more I get doubts on its validity.
Every explanation I find ignores certain parts, and we easily jump back and forth at our convenience between models to explain the behaviour we are actually seeing.
That's the reason I am here and the invitation I got asked me to introduce myself.
I do physics for fun, not for living.
From J.J Thomson 1904, to Rutherford 1911, Bohr 1913 and Mulliken 1932 the atomic model underwent four major changes (including its creation)
The more I read and learn about the latest state, the more I get doubts on its validity.
Every explanation I find ignores certain parts, and we easily jump back and forth at our convenience between models to explain the behaviour we are actually seeing.
That's the reason I am here and the invitation I got asked me to introduce myself.