- #1
San K
- 911
- 1
While I think that the phenomena of Quantum Entanglement exists, it's real; it's interesting to understand more about it.
How does QE/QM explain more mismatches (relatively to simple probability calculations) in Bell's test at wider angles?
Or alternatively: Why does/would QE result in lower matches (rather than higher matches) at wider angles?
QE = quantum entanglement
In Bell's Tests, we get the following results: ----------------Per QM/Actual Experiment
----------------Mismatches (out of 100)at (0,30) --------------- 25
at (-30,0) -------------- 25
At (-30,30) ------------- 75Per LHV the result at (-30, 30) should have been 50.
Thus we are getting 25 more mismatches. No LHV theory can explain this, however QM can explain this mathematically and conceptually.What is the conceptual explanation per QM?
Is it something like below?:
Since the two entangled photons are somehow "connected/entangled" the chances/probability of a match will decrease because both the photons have to satisfied "in a connected manner" (i.e. both have to encounter "good" angles in a "connected/entangled manner").
or to take another example:
Rating a movie as Liked or Disliked
Case A - Two friends watch a movie and communicate with each other prior to rating the movie. And the friends have the ability to influence each other's rating.
Case B - Two individuals watch a movie and never communicate with each other and rate a movie.
There are two parts here:
Part 1 -- no theory (other than QM) can explain this
Part 2 -- QM can explain this
How does QE/QM explain more mismatches (relatively to simple probability calculations) in Bell's test at wider angles?
Or alternatively: Why does/would QE result in lower matches (rather than higher matches) at wider angles?
QE = quantum entanglement
In Bell's Tests, we get the following results: ----------------Per QM/Actual Experiment
----------------Mismatches (out of 100)at (0,30) --------------- 25
at (-30,0) -------------- 25
At (-30,30) ------------- 75Per LHV the result at (-30, 30) should have been 50.
Thus we are getting 25 more mismatches. No LHV theory can explain this, however QM can explain this mathematically and conceptually.What is the conceptual explanation per QM?
Is it something like below?:
Since the two entangled photons are somehow "connected/entangled" the chances/probability of a match will decrease because both the photons have to satisfied "in a connected manner" (i.e. both have to encounter "good" angles in a "connected/entangled manner").
or to take another example:
Rating a movie as Liked or Disliked
Case A - Two friends watch a movie and communicate with each other prior to rating the movie. And the friends have the ability to influence each other's rating.
Case B - Two individuals watch a movie and never communicate with each other and rate a movie.
wiki said:The Bell test experiments have been interpreted as showing that the Bell inequalities are violated in favour of QM. That interpretation follows not from any clear demonstration of super-luminal communication in the tests themselves, but solely from Bell's theory that the correctness of the quantum predictions necessarily precludes any local hidden-variable theory.
There are two parts here:
Part 1 -- no theory (other than QM) can explain this
Part 2 -- QM can explain this
Last edited: