Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design?

In summary, the conversation discusses the discovery of a highly advanced motor in bacteria and how this complexity may provide evidence for design rather than chance. However, the idea of design is not supported by scientific evidence and there is research on the evolution of this structure. Creationism and intelligent design are not considered valid scientific theories.
  • #1
mram10
14
0
Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design??

I was studying bacteria. With better technology we have been able to determine that bacteria have an extremely detailed motor that allows for transportation. It is equivalent to a human swimming thru thick grease at 60 miles an hour. It baffled my mind thinking that the more information we find ... the more complex things turned out to be, it seems more evidence for a design rather than a chance. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Firstly you can't have "more evidence" because there is no evidence for design. Secondly even if there was no explanation for the evolution of a structure that does not mean it did not evolve nor does this count as evidence for other hypotheses. Thirdly there has been plenty of research on flagellum evolution. Lastly creationism/intelligent design is not science and has no place on this science forum, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=593815.
 

Related to Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design?

1. What is the concept of "Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design"?

The concept of "Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design" is the idea that as we gain a deeper understanding of the natural world and the complexities of life, we are presented with more evidence that points to an intelligent designer or creator.

2. How does the theory of evolution fit into this concept?

The theory of evolution does not necessarily contradict the concept of "Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design." While evolution explains how species have adapted and changed over time, it does not address the origins of life or the intricate design found in living organisms.

3. Can you provide an example of evidence for design?

One example of evidence for design is the complexity of the human eye. The eye is made up of numerous intricate parts, such as the cornea, iris, lens, and retina, all working together to produce the sense of sight. This level of complexity and functionality suggests that it was designed by an intelligent creator.

4. How does this concept relate to the argument for intelligent design?

The concept of "Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design" is often used as support for the argument of intelligent design. It suggests that as we gain more knowledge about the natural world, we are presented with more evidence that supports the idea of an intelligent designer or creator behind it.

5. Is this concept widely accepted in the scientific community?

The concept of "Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design" is a controversial topic in the scientific community. While some scientists and researchers argue that it is a valid concept, others refute it and point to natural explanations for the complexities of life. Ultimately, the acceptance of this concept varies among individuals and their beliefs.

Similar threads

Discussion on the science-literature relationship and more
    • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
979
I could really use some help picking my optional module [GameDev]
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
963
I Adding random numbers: Tolerance analysis
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
450
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
    • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Doing always more: good or evil?
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Effects of a rapidly developing, unknown nearby civilization
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
18
Views
2K
The Myth Of Empirical Knowledge, Data, Evidence
    • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
13K
The Grand Design and other Explanations without Explanation
    • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
The rise and fall of evidence-based natural philosophy.
    • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
4K
Rejecting Intelligent Design: A High Schooler's Arguments
    • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top