Generalized Coordinates - Landau & Lifshitz

In summary: form...makes sense, as it is the only way to uniquely determine the future behavior of the system (assuming you have the initial conditions).
  • #1
sisyphusRocks
4
0
upload_2015-8-27_17-16-13.png


If suppose only if the velocities are determined for all N particles can the system be completely determined, can we not extend and say that only if acceleration for all particles are provided can the system be completely determined? For instance can there not be two systems of N particles with same velocities and same positions but different accelerations. I am not sure I am getting this part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To add to that:

upload_2015-8-27_17-35-31.png


Again in the second para it is said that the mechanical system is completely defined when the coordinates and velocities arent given. How so? I am missing a fundamental point here. Does that mean Lagrangian action principle only applies to certain kind of mechanical systems and there could systems which are non lagrangian? Please help.
 
  • #3
To add to that:

upload_2015-8-27_17-52-36.png
Here as we started with a Lagrangian which depended on only q and q dot, we are left with 2s constants and s second order equations and hence we need initial conditions of s coordinates and s velocities and we are done. Suppose we had a lagrangian which depends on q dot dot also then we would be left with a complicated problem. I am not sure what type of lagrange equations will come up if we try to minimize the action which is based on such a lagrangian? Am i making sense here? Please read all my three posts in order to understand my question. Thanks for any help. I am not able to proceed with the next chapter as this is nagging me.
 
  • #4
sisyphusRocks said:
If suppose only if the velocities are determined for all N particles can the system be completely determined, can we not extend and say that only if acceleration for all particles are provided can the system be completely determined?
You have to read carefully (which is always the case with L&L): "it is known from experience[...]" It is the study of the natural world that tells us that $q$ and $\dot{q}$ are sufficient.

One way to understand why that is the case is to consider that if you can calculate all internal and external forces, then you can calculate the acceleration of all particles. If the forces only depend on $q$ and $\dot{q}$ (which they usually do), then the system is fully specified.

sisyphusRocks said:
For instance can there not be two systems of N particles with same velocities and same positions but different accelerations. I am not sure I am getting this part.
If they have different accelerations, it means that the forces acting on the particles are not the same, which means that it is not the same physical system.
 
  • Like
Likes sisyphusRocks
  • #5
sisyphusRocks said:
T
Again in the second para it is said that the mechanical system is completely defined when the coordinates and velocities arent given. How so? I am missing a fundamental point here. Does that mean Lagrangian action principle only applies to certain kind of mechanical systems and there could systems which are non lagrangian? Please help.
To quote from Wikipedia:
Wikipedia said:
No new physics is introduced by Lagrangian mechanics; it is actually less general than Newtonian mechanics.[7] Newton's laws can include non-conservative forces like friction, however they must include constraint forces explicitly and are best suited to Cartesian coordinates. Lagrangian mechanics is ideal for systems with conservative forces and for bypassing constraint forces, and some (not all) non-conservative forces, in any coordinate system. Generalized coordinates can be chosen by convenience, to exploit symmetries in the system or the geometry of the constraints, which considerably simplifies describing the dynamics of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes sisyphusRocks
  • #6
DrClaude said:
If the forces only depend on $q$ and $\dot{q}$ (which they usually do), then the system is fully specified.

This clarifies my doubt. Now I am more peaceful. Thank you. The wikipedia also threw light to my problem.

DrClaude said:
If they have different accelerations, it means that the forces acting on the particles are not the same, which means that it is not the same physical system.

This makes sense. Thank you.
 
  • #7
sisyphusRocks said:
For instance can there not be two systems of N particles with same velocities and same positions but different accelerations.
Yes. A system is characterized by its Lagrangian. Different systems will have different Lagrangians. In order to specify the future behavior of a single system you need:
1) The Lagrangian which characterizes the system
2) The initial coordinates
3) The initial velocities

You do not need the initial accelerations because those are determined by the combination of the initial coordinates and the Lagrangian.
 
  • #8
In other words, as long as your Lagrangian is only a function of the generalized coordinates ##q## and the generalized velocities ##\dot{q}## (and maybe also explicitly on time), your Euler-Lagrange equations, solving the variational principle of least (stationary) action,
$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q},$$
are a system of 2nd-order ordinary differential equations, determining the trajectory ##q(t)## of the system, if you have given ##q(t_0)=q_0## and ##\dot{q}(t_0)=\dot{q}_0## (initial-value problem).

That the Lagrangian is of this specific form is plausible from Newton's 2nd Law, which is a 2nd order differential equation for the position of the particle(s). That the equations of motion are of this form, cannot be derived but is, as Landau-Lifshitz states, just based "on experience", as any fundamental law of nature are just based on empirical evidence. In this sense all our scientific knowledge is always tentative since, if new empirical facts contradicting a so far "valid" natural law become known, we have to adapt our theories to this new facts. To determine whether an observation is really a fact or based on mistakes in the experimental setup and/or observation, is of course another difficult story, but now I drift too much into the philosophy of science...
 

Related to Generalized Coordinates - Landau & Lifshitz

1. What are generalized coordinates?

Generalized coordinates are a set of independent variables that describe the position of a system in space. They are used in classical mechanics to simplify the equations of motion and to describe the configuration of a system in terms of its degrees of freedom.

2. How are generalized coordinates different from regular coordinates?

Regular coordinates, such as Cartesian coordinates, are fixed in space and describe the position of an object relative to a fixed reference frame. Generalized coordinates, on the other hand, are not fixed and can vary with time. They are defined in terms of the degrees of freedom of a system and can change as the system evolves.

3. How do you determine the degrees of freedom in a system?

The degrees of freedom in a system are determined by the number of independent coordinates needed to uniquely describe the position of all the particles in the system. For example, a single particle in three-dimensional space has three degrees of freedom, while a rigid body with fixed axis rotation has six degrees of freedom.

4. What are the advantages of using generalized coordinates?

Using generalized coordinates can simplify the mathematical description of a system and make it easier to solve for the equations of motion. It also allows for a more intuitive understanding of the behavior of a system and can reveal underlying symmetries that may not be apparent in regular coordinates.

5. Can generalized coordinates be used in any type of system?

Yes, generalized coordinates can be used in any system as long as the degrees of freedom can be identified. They are commonly used in classical mechanics, but can also be applied in other areas such as quantum mechanics and thermodynamics.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
705
Replies
9
Views
716
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
587
Replies
0
Views
255
Replies
7
Views
920
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
758
  • Classical Physics
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
987
Replies
5
Views
765
Back
Top