Exploring the Mystery of Photon Mass Zero: Fact or Fiction?

In summary, Photons have a mass zero, but they still have energy and momentum. Only zero rest mass things can travel at the speed of light.
  • #1
Bart001
4
0
Photon Mass Zero?

Ok right to the point, I've learned that a Photon since it is moving at c has a mass zero, but yet I've also heard that with a sensitive enough scale, that you can measure the force of sunlight or other light as photons...very small force, but still a force
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it.
F=ma - classical or not, still true...

and if there's a mass with a velocity c, then...
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Photons have zero rest mass. However, they do have energy and momentum, so they can exert force. Only zero rest mass things can travel at the speed of light.
 
  • #3
mathman said:
Photons have zero rest mass. However, they do have energy and momentum, so they can exert force. Only zero rest mass things can travel at the speed of light.
To add to this, consider Newton's second law, "'An applied force is equal to the rate of change of momentum'."
 
  • #5
Bart001 said:
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it. NO!
F=ma - classical or not, still NOT true...

there's NEVER a mass with a velocity c.
I need at least ten letters for the answer.
 
  • #6
Bart001 said:
Ok right to the point, I've learned that a Photon since it is moving at c has a mass zero, but yet I've also heard that with a sensitive enough scale, that you can measure the force of sunlight or other light as photons...very small force, but still a force
A measureable force, must have a mass associated with it.
F=ma - classical or not, still true...
and if there's a mass with a velocity c, then...

actually Bart, [itex] F = m a = m \frac{dv}{dt} [/itex] is not precisely true, but is very close at slow speeds relative to the speed of light when the mass of the object remains constant. the accurate expression is:

[tex] F = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{d(mv)}{dt} = m \frac{dv}{dt} + v \frac{dm}{dt} [/tex]

due to the product rule of differentiation. so if you had a body moving at a constant velocity, v, and somehow its mass was increasing (thus increasing its momentum) a force would be required to keep it going at that constant velocity.

that being said, i am of "the other side" which maintains that Photons have mass, but no rest mass. . differentiating between "mass" in general and "rest mass" seems to be out of vogue of late but the reality of that difference exists. the reason there can be no rest mass is that if any particle moving at c did have rest mass, its relativistic mass would be infinite at speed c, and photons do not have infinite mass.
 
  • #7
sorry for my ignorace... I'm still second year physics, and just really trying to have a FEEL and Intuition for Physics...lol...
Also a lot is based on the fact that c is a constant... but some physicist contend this... that c may not be constant, and Einstein might be wrong
I'm really not trying to piss you guys off or seem like a know it all , that might not know anything...lol...
I also read that Hawking retracted a couple theories or papers, in light of new evidence and reconsideration... and I'm sure they were accepted as LAW...

In my last year of high school, I had to do a research paper for english and being a physics student I picked, Trying to say the speed of light was not a constant...
Two papers were my foundation, one from "I think" cambridge and MIT...
1. made light travel through a cesium gas tube faster than c, almost 300 times faster, and,
2. made light travel at 26mph in a gas tube...
Also, another paper said that maybe at the time of the big bang the speed of light was 300 times faster...

So I went on to say that the speed of light depends on the energy in the medium that it travels... Big bang, Very energetic and very fast
And now the universe has cooled and the speed has slowed down to the current speed of c...
And Another textbook actually had a graph that the speed of light has change since the bigbang, and for the couple hundred years that we have been able to measure it, the universe hasnt cooled measureably...

SOrry for this being SOOO long...
 

Related to Exploring the Mystery of Photon Mass Zero: Fact or Fiction?

1. What is "Photon Mass Zero"?

"Photon Mass Zero" refers to the concept that photons, which are particles of light, have a mass of zero. This means that they do not have any physical weight or substance, and instead only carry energy and momentum.

2. How was it determined that photons have zero mass?

The concept of photon mass zero was first proposed by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity. This theory states that the mass of an object increases as its speed approaches the speed of light. Since photons travel at the speed of light, their mass must be zero.

3. Are there any experiments that support the idea of photon mass zero?

Yes, there have been many experiments conducted that support the concept of photon mass zero. One notable experiment was the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887, which showed that the speed of light is constant regardless of the observer's reference frame, providing evidence for special relativity and the zero mass of photons.

4. Does the idea of photon mass zero have any practical applications?

Yes, the concept of photon mass zero has several practical applications. It helps us understand the behavior of light and electromagnetic radiation, and plays a crucial role in technologies such as lasers, solar cells, and fiber optics.

5. Is there any evidence to suggest that photons may have a small, non-zero mass?

While the concept of photon mass zero is widely accepted in the scientific community, there have been some theories and experiments that suggest that photons may have a very small, non-zero mass. However, this is still a topic of debate and further research is needed to confirm or refute these claims.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
745
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
305
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Back
Top