Exploring the Analogy of Negative Energy in Physics: The Jack-in-the-Box Example

In summary, the conversation discusses the analogy of a jack-in-the-box to explain the relationship between energy and mass. The analogy states that a compressed spring inside the box would weigh more than when relaxed, and the same applies to a stretched spring. It also mentions that this concept was used by a physicist to describe negative energy due to gravitational potential. The conversation also touches upon the equation for elastic potential energy and its relevance to the analogy.
  • #1
droog
23
0
I seem to recall reading an analogy describing the total mass/energy of a jack-in-the-box. This said that a compressed spring insided a box would "weigh" more than the same when relaxed (albeit immeasurable small). This makes sense given the equivalence of energy and mass. But what if the spring is stretched out (and held out inside the box). Does the box now "weigh" more again due to the energy stored in the streched spring or is the sign preserved making the whole deal "lighter". I'm sure this analogy was given by a respectable physicist when describing negative energy due to gravitational potential - I just can't recall where.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The elastic PE stored in a spring is given by [itex]1/2 k x^2[/itex], where x is the displacement from its unstretched position. Whether compressed or stretched, the stored energy is always positive.
 
  • #3
Doc Al said:
The elastic PE stored in a spring is given by [itex]1/2 k x^2[/itex], where x is the displacement from its unstretched position. Whether compressed or stretched, the stored energy is always positive.
OK thanks. So what was the purpose of the example I wonder? I'm sure it was given to show more than just the equivalence of mass and energy. The proposition related to the cancellation of mass/energy within the totality of the universe on account of the "negative energy" contributed by the gravitational attraction of all the mass/energy.
 

Related to Exploring the Analogy of Negative Energy in Physics: The Jack-in-the-Box Example

1. What is negative energy analogy?

Negative energy analogy is a concept used in science to explain the behavior of certain phenomena by comparing them to the opposite effects of other well-known phenomena. It is often used to help understand complex or abstract concepts.

2. How is negative energy analogy used in science?

Negative energy analogy is used in science to help explain and understand complex or abstract concepts. It allows scientists to make connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena and gain a deeper understanding of how they work.

3. Can you give an example of negative energy analogy?

One example of negative energy analogy is the concept of antiparticles in particle physics. Antiparticles have the same mass as their corresponding particles, but opposite charges. This is similar to the concept of negative energy, where the energy is opposite in sign but the same in magnitude.

4. How does negative energy analogy relate to conservation laws?

Negative energy analogy can help explain conservation laws in science. For example, the conservation of energy can be compared to the conservation of negative energy, where the total amount of energy (including negative energy) in a system remains constant.

5. Is negative energy analogy a widely accepted concept in science?

Yes, negative energy analogy is a widely accepted concept in science. It has been used in various fields, including particle physics, quantum mechanics, and relativity, to help explain complex phenomena and further our understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top