Our "Beyond the Standard Model" forum is intended for discussion of current, professionally researched theories such as string theory and LQG. (Which attempt to go 'beyond' the standard model of particle physics.) Despite what the title might seem to imply, that forum is not intended as a place to discuss challenges to standard, mainstream physics.bill alsept said:Why have a category called "Beyond the Standard Model" ?
bill alsept said:Are there any forums where people are not afraid to discuss things that do not completely agree with the views of the forums gatekeepers?
ZapperZ said:And just for your information, none of us are "afraid" about such things. However, I can easily point the accusation the other way, where crackpots are lazy and "afraid" to learn physics.
bill alsept said:Thats is all I was asking in my original Post Kinetic Gravity that was locked. Where is the physics that shows subjects like kinetic gravity to be so utterly wrong that no one is allowed to even discuss them? Why do I have to be the bad guy for only asking questions that no one has answered.
ZapperZ said:Are you claiming that the topic you want to discuss falls within the Scientific Discussion Guidelines of the PF Rules that you had agreed to? If so, can you show evidence that it does?
Zz.
bill alsept said:For one thing kinetic gravity in one form or another has been part of scientific history much longer than other subjects discussed on this forum. If the subject is banned for some strange reason then maybe there should be list of taboo subjects. Besides all I have ever asked from any of you is to help direct me to the science that rejects kinetic gravity so I can study it for myself. And if you could be kind enough to at least attempt to explain why you believe that only that view is correct.
ZapperZ said:Notice that you've not answered my question, and that tells me that such avoidance seems to imply that it DOES NOT conform to the rules that YOU had agreed to.
bill alsept said:For the record I have never discussed kinetic gravity.(I would like to) The original post that I was wrongly penalized for only asked "Can anyone direct me to any articles that prove kinetic gravity impossible." I legitimately wanted to study those articles in order to see why such a subject could be so taboo to everyone. Who know it was radioactively taboo??
It would have been much easier to answer the original question than to make such an issue of a simple question. Sorry
PF Rules said:Generally, in the science discussion forums we do not allow the following:
Discussion of theories that appear only on personal web sites, self-published books, etc.
Challenges to mainstream theories (relativity, the Big Bang, etc.) that go beyond current professional discussion
Attempts to promote or resuscitate theories that have been discredited or superseded (e.g. Lorentz ether theory); this does not exclude discussion of those theories in a purely historical context
Personal theories or speculations that go beyond or counter to generally-accepted science
Mixing science and religion, e.g. using religious doctrines in support of scientific arguments or vice versa.
bill alsept said:For the record I have never discussed kinetic gravity.(I would like to) The original post that I was wrongly penalized for only asked "Can anyone direct me to any articles that prove kinetic gravity impossible." I legitimately wanted to study those articles in order to see why such a subject could be so taboo to everyone. Who know it was radioactively taboo??
It would have been much easier to answer the original question than to make such an issue of a simple question. Sorry
The Standard Model in Kinetic Gravity Forums refers to the traditional framework used to describe the interactions and behavior of particles in the universe. It includes the theories of quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces.
Exploring creativity in Kinetic Gravity is important because it allows us to think outside the box and come up with new theories and ideas that challenge the limitations of the Standard Model. This can lead to breakthroughs and advancements in our understanding of the universe.
Some examples of creative approaches to Kinetic Gravity include the development of alternative theories, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity, that aim to go beyond the limitations of the Standard Model. Another example is the use of computer simulations and experimental data to test and validate new ideas.
Exploring creativity in Kinetic Gravity can benefit the scientific community by fostering collaboration, innovation, and the development of new technologies. It can also lead to a better understanding of the universe and potentially solve some of the most perplexing questions in physics.
Some challenges that may arise when exploring creativity in Kinetic Gravity include the need for extensive research and experimentation, as well as the potential for new theories to be met with skepticism and criticism from the scientific community. Additionally, there may be limitations in technology and resources that can hinder the exploration of creative ideas.