Einstein equivalence principle

In summary: The weak equivalence principle states that the laws of physics are the same in a free fall and in a lab in free fall.The weak equivalence principle states that the laws of physics are the same in a free fall and in a lab in free fall.The strong equivalence principle states that the laws of physics are the same in a nonrotating laboratory in free fall.The strong equivalence principle states that the laws of physics are the same in a nonrotating laboratory in free fall.Einstein showed that the laws of physics are the same in a closed box in free fall, even though the box is accelerating.Einstein showed that the laws of physics are the same in a closed box in free fall
  • #1
Sobi
19
0
I can not understand what exactly this principle says.while reading a book about it ,it was written that einstein abolished gravity by saying the lift is free falling can some explain clearly what does that mean?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sobi said:
I can not understand what exactly this principle says.while reading a book about it ,it was written that einstein abolished gravity by saying the lift is free falling can some explain clearly what does that mean?

It means that (apart from tidal forces) experiments that you perform in a free falling lift will have the same results as experiments that you perform in a lab in empty space.
 
  • #3
Smattering said:
It means that (apart from tidal forces) experiments that you perform in a free falling lift will have the same results as experiments that you perform in a lab in empty space.
A lab in empty space would be a lab in free fall.
 
  • #4
Chalnoth said:
A lab in empty space would be a lab in free fall.

Yes, but as far as I know this view had not been established when Einstein began working in GR.
 
  • #5
Smattering said:
Yes, but as far as I know this view had not been established when Einstein began working in GR.
Yes, it had. This realization is based upon Newtonian gravity. Newtonian gravity is an infinite-range force, which means that a lab in orbit still experiences gravity. People in that lab only feel weightless because the lab is in free fall.

Einstein's philosophical contribution here was to state that this equivalence between acceleration and gravity is a real thing, not just a trick of the math.
 
  • #6
It means that if you're in a closed box, you cannot say whether you're in a gravitational field or the box is accelerating. Both have the same effects.
 
  • #7
Chalnoth said:
Yes, it had. This realization is based upon Newtonian gravity. Newtonian gravity is an infinite-range force, which means that a lab in orbit still experiences gravity. People in that lab only feel weightless because the lab is in free fall.

Einstein's philosophical contribution here was to state that this equivalence between acceleration and gravity is a real thing, not just a trick of the math.

Hm ... I thought the version that was established before Einstein was only the so-called weak equivalence principle (equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass), and it was Einstein who extended this to the strong equivalence principle (invariance of physical laws in nonrotating laboratories freely falling in a uniform gravitational field).
 
  • #8
it has also written that the free fall is a local inertial frame.well I will accept that any thing inside the lab will feel that it is moving with a constant speed compared to the other things inside the lab,but inside the book it stated that this was a problem for Einstein because then special relativity had to hold true there.i also need an explanation wether special relativity will be true there or not?
 

Related to Einstein equivalence principle

1. What is the Einstein equivalence principle?

The Einstein equivalence principle is a fundamental concept in physics that states that the effects of gravity are indistinguishable from the effects of acceleration. In other words, an observer in a uniform gravitational field cannot distinguish between being at rest in that field and being in an accelerating reference frame.

2. How did Einstein develop the equivalence principle?

Einstein developed the equivalence principle as a key component of his theory of general relativity. He was inspired by the observation that objects in free-fall experience weightlessness, which is similar to the experience of objects in a uniform gravitational field. He also drew on the principle of equivalence proposed by Galileo, which states that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames.

3. Why is the equivalence principle important?

The equivalence principle is important because it provides a deeper understanding of the nature of gravity and its relationship to other fundamental forces. It also serves as the basis for many tests and predictions of general relativity, which has been confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.

4. How does the equivalence principle relate to the concept of space-time curvature?

The equivalence principle is closely related to the concept of space-time curvature in general relativity. According to the theory, the presence of mass or energy causes space-time to curve, which in turn affects the motion of objects in that space-time. The equivalence principle implies that this curvature can also be interpreted as the effects of a gravitational field.

5. Are there any exceptions to the Einstein equivalence principle?

While the Einstein equivalence principle holds true in most cases, there are some exceptions. For example, it does not apply to highly localized gravitational fields, such as those near black holes, where the effects of gravity can be significantly different from those of acceleration. Additionally, in quantum mechanics, it has been shown that there are subtle differences between the effects of gravity and acceleration on particles at a microscopic level.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
813
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
743
Back
Top