Does ##x_\mu x^\mu## Equal ##(x_\mu)^2## in Einstein Notation?

In summary, there is a debate about the use of the notation ##(x_\mu)^2## in differential geometry, as it is considered bad notation and does not have a clear meaning. Some argue that it is similar to asking what 1s + 1Hz is, while others argue that it is commonly used in physics papers and can be understood in the context of proper learning. Some textbooks, such as Schwartz's QFT book, place all indices down with the understanding that one should be considered contravariant and the other covariant.
  • #1
Silviu
624
11
Hello! Does ##(x_\mu)^2## actually means ##x_\mu x^\mu## in Einstein notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Drop the book using the ##x_{\mu}^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes Mgcini Keith Phuthi and fresh_42
  • #3
dextercioby said:
Drop the book using the ##x_{\mu}^2##.
So this means they are the same, but ##x_{\mu}^2## is bad notation?
 
  • #4
@dextercioby is saying that ##(x_\mu)^2## is an illegal expression in differential geometry, analogous to asking what 1s + 1Hz is. It doesn't mean anything. Unless there's some context we're missing (for example Sean Carroll's lecture notes sstarts his discussion of EM with non-tensor all-lower index notation for Maxwell's equations before re-writing them in tensor form). Where did you see it?
 
  • #5
dextercioby said:
Drop the book using the ##x_{\mu}^2##.
Although I agree that it is really a bastard notation using this for ##g_{\mu\nu}x^\mu x^\nu##, I would not categorically advice to drop such a book. You will find that many physics papers use a similar notation in the kinetic term for a field, i.e., ##(\partial_\mu\phi)^2##. There really is only one thing that can mean and still be meaningful. Of course, the understanding of this is predicated on first having learned it properly ... In Schwartz's QFT book, he places all indices down with the initial statement that it should be subtextual that one should be considered contravariant and the other covariant.
 

Related to Does ##x_\mu x^\mu## Equal ##(x_\mu)^2## in Einstein Notation?

1. What is Einstein notation?

Einstein notation, also known as Einstein summation convention, is a mathematical notation commonly used in physics to simplify and condense equations involving vectors, tensors, and matrices. It uses the summation symbol, ∑, to represent repeated indices in a product of terms.

2. What is the meaning of ##x_\mu x^\mu## in Einstein notation?

In Einstein notation, ##x_\mu x^\mu## represents the sum of products of all the components of a vector ##x##, where ##\mu## is a repeated index. This is known as the inner product or dot product of a vector with itself and is equivalent to the square of the magnitude of the vector.

3. Does ##x_\mu x^\mu## equal ##(x_\mu)^2## in Einstein notation?

Yes, ##x_\mu x^\mu## is mathematically equivalent to ##(x_\mu)^2## in Einstein notation. This is because the repeated index in the product represents a summation over all the components of the vector, resulting in the square of the magnitude of the vector.

4. How is Einstein notation useful in physics?

Einstein notation is useful in simplifying and condensing equations involving vectors, tensors, and matrices in physics. It allows for concise representation of mathematical expressions and makes it easier to perform calculations, especially in higher-dimensional spaces.

5. Are there any other notations that are similar to Einstein notation?

Yes, there are other notations that are similar to Einstein notation, such as the index-free notation and the Penrose graphical notation. These notations also use indices to represent repeated terms, but they have different rules and conventions compared to Einstein notation.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
186
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
124
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
453
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top