Direct proportionality equations

In summary, the conversation discusses the equation ##x = vt + x_0## and whether it represents a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##. The expert explains that while there is not a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##, there is one between ##(x-x_0)## and ##t##, or between ##(x-x_0)## and ##v##. The expert also mentions that linearity can be used to describe the relationship between ##x## and ##t##.
  • #1
ChiralSuperfields
1,304
138
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1685668525439.png

Can a the equation ##x = vt + x_0## not be considered a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##? If so, is it because there is a constant ##x_0##?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
  • #3
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this,
View attachment 327344
Can a the equation ##x = vt + x_0## not be considered a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##? If so, is it because there is a constant ##x_0##?

Many thanks!
The direct proportionality is between ##(x-x_0)## and ##t##. If you double ##v##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##t##.
You can also say that there is direct proportionality between ##(x-x_0)## and ##v##. If you double ##t##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##v##. Makes intuitive sense, no?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Steve4Physics, hmmm27 and ChiralSuperfields
  • #4
kuruman said:
The direct proportionality is between ##(x-x_0)## and ##t##. If you double ##v##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##t##.
You can also say that there is direct proportionality between ##(x-x_0)## and ##v##. If you double ##t##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##v##. Makes intuitive sense, no?
Thank you for your reply @kuruman! Yeah that is interesting, and yeah I think it makes sense :)

Many thanks!
 
  • #5
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @kuruman! Yeah that is interesting, and yeah I think it makes sense :)
@kuruman's test (Post #3) for proportionality is straightforward. Ask yourself: 'If I double one quantity, does the other quantity always get doubled?'. If the answer is 'yes' the quantities are proportional.

Of course, there's nothing special about doubling. It works for any factor. E.g. if ##y## is proportional to ##x##, then tripling ##x## also triples ##y##. This should be clear if you thnk about the equation ##y=kx##.

It’s also worth thinking graphically. If two quantities are directly proportional, a graph of one quantity against the other is a straight line through the origin.

If you get a straight line which doesn't pass through the origin, the quantities are not proportional;. In this case, the relationship is called 'linearity'. E.g. for the equation ##x=vt + x_0## there are various ways to describe the relationship between ##x## and ##t##: e.g. '##x## is linearly dependent on ##t##'; or 'there is a linear releationship between ##x## and ##t##'.

Edit: typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes ChiralSuperfields and kuruman

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
276
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
506
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
801
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
223
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
186
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
844
Back
Top