Cost-effective (and green) monitoring of plant water

In summary: I think the most straightforward way to get it rolling to begin with would be to use soil-grown plants and make a little irrigation system that you could turn on and off at your heart's content. Problem is I can't find anything on the internet in which people would have considered lakewater as a ready source of both water+nutrients.
  • #1
cremor
19
3
What do you think is the ultimate way to oversee plant nutrient water composition - say you need to check the nutrient levels from a natural water source for all the essentials a handful of times a year? Full profile: N, P, K, Ca, S, Mg, B, Cl, Mn, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mo, Ni.

Preferred method would be to use the least amount of disposables, and naturally, to be able to get it done relatively easily.

Cost effectiveness in this case means an investment of anywhere between 1-10k €.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends on the variety of plant you want to grow and you don't need a full or a comprehensive test(all minerals and elements) just for the sake--unless, you test the water for contaminants --wherein a comprehensive coverage of pollutants might be tested.

Stick with the basic of life. Plant do need(aside from sunlight and carbon dioxide) first, a good organic food, second- fertilizer(NPK) and third-minerals.This guy has sense and may help with your problem. He does actual testing by growing.
 
  • #3
I live in the vicinity of lakewater and I've been pondering about making a little (warm) greenhouse in which I could grow some veggies and fruits for food all year round, or at least when sunlight exceeds 12hrs a day (march-september). I don't have a lot of time to manage it to be honest and that's why I thought the traditional fertilizing would become too much of a hassle (plus the manure odour is not-accepted in the immediate vicinity of the house;)

I thought that lakewater has a lot of organic material in it (at least this lake), and should thus provide a fairly good and already fertilized water source. EC and pH should also be in the 1.8-2.2 (EC) and 6.0 (pH) region. Plus it would be enviromentally friendly to use it eutrophication-wise.

I'm no agrologist, but I thought that the most straightforward way to get it rolling to begin with would be to use soil-grown plants and make a little irrigation system that you could turn on and off at your heart's content. Problem is I can't find anything on the internet in which people would have considered lakewater as a ready source of both water+nutrients. Any thoughts?
 
  • #4
I doubt lake water is rich enough in nutrients. Whenever it is, lakes bloom with algae as crazy (till the algae die and the lake stinks as hell).
 
  • #5
Send a sample to a certified lab.

Plants need trace amounts of minerals. Is the soil you are using really barren?

You fertilize with nitrogen, potassium and phosphate. If you don't want to fertilize it, once or twice a year should be enough, you can hire someone.

This post is really strange. You want to grow some vegetables in a greenhouse. Market worth is probably 100-200 dollars. But you want to spend 10k to check now much nickel, manganese and molybdenum is in the water? And you call it an investment?

If you are just growing vegetables, you would only take action when there's signs your plants are unhealthy.
 
  • #6
Well, I believe the price is not everything, and while 10k is obviously pushing it, 1k sure isn't over a few years time. I live in the upper latitudes. There's only a few months of summer season that's noticeable in the grocery store, otherwise the greenery you buy fresh can cost (tomatoes, cucumber, zucchini, apples, pears, etc) up to 15-20$ a kilogram easily, even more. Plus they're usually shipped from a thousand to a few thousand kilometers distance, which I think is a bit crazy in many ways. If I could provide the heating required essentially from otherwise wasted heat, and the power consumption for the extra lighting required would be in the few hundred dollars range / year, I would be matching the cost of the local grocery store pretty much. Pound per pound price probably wouldn't be a lot different from the present, but at least it would be more fresh, and it would be nice to have a little garden all year round.

Certified lab costs could be getting kind of heavy and impractical if you have to do a before-and-after check a few times a year? Obviously purchasing a certified lab and learning how to use it would be impractical too...

I thought that if there was an easy way to readings out of everything one should need for growing, then it would be relatively easy to get a storage tank that'll last a good while, fill it up, check it out for all the essentials and add as required, use it and do it all over again, and evade the diagnostics of malnourishment altogether? (no increase from the present required in that section:wink:)

Edit: Soil could be very barren, since I thought I could have a little hydroponical section!
 
Last edited:

Related to Cost-effective (and green) monitoring of plant water

1. How does cost-effective monitoring of plant water differ from traditional methods?

Cost-effective monitoring of plant water involves the use of modern technology and data analysis techniques to track and analyze water usage in plants. Traditional methods often rely on manual measurements and visual observations, which can be time-consuming and less accurate.

2. What are some examples of green monitoring techniques for plant water?

Some examples of green monitoring techniques for plant water include the use of soil moisture sensors, satellite imagery, and remote sensing technologies. These methods are non-invasive and do not require the use of harmful chemicals or excessive water consumption.

3. How can cost-effective and green monitoring of plant water benefit farmers?

Cost-effective and green monitoring of plant water can benefit farmers by providing real-time data on water usage and helping them make informed decisions about irrigation and crop management. This can lead to more efficient water usage, reduced costs, and improved crop yields.

4. Are there any potential drawbacks to using cost-effective and green monitoring of plant water?

One potential drawback is the initial cost of implementing these monitoring techniques, as they may require an investment in equipment or software. Additionally, there may be a learning curve for farmers who are not familiar with these technologies.

5. How can cost-effective and green monitoring of plant water contribute to sustainable agriculture?

By reducing water consumption and improving crop management, cost-effective and green monitoring of plant water can contribute to sustainable agriculture. This can help conserve water resources and reduce the environmental impact of farming practices.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top