Constraints on potential for normalizable wavefunction

In summary: This is not a problem for the infinite square well or simple harmonic oscillator because their potentials go to infinity at the boundaries.
  • #1
Gfunction
3
1
We know that in one dimension if ##E>V(\infty)## or ##E>V(-\infty)## then the resulting wave function will not be normalizable. The basic argument is that if ##E>V(\infty)##, then a stationary solution to the Schrodinger equation will necessarily have a concavity with the same sign as the solution itself for all ##x## greater than some value ##a##. So if the resulting wavefunction was positive after ##a##, then the wavefunction would also be concave up and curve away from the x-axis. Then the integral of the squared wavefunction would tend towards infinity since the wavefunction would never again go to ##0##. A similar argument can be made if the wavefunction was negative after ##a## and again for ##E>V(-\infty)##. We don't have this problem with the infinite square well or simple harmonic oscillator because the potentials go to infinity at ##\pm \infty##.

In short, my question is this: What are necessary and sufficient conditions for a potential to generate normalizable solutions?

I would prefer to keep things simple with a one-dimensional treatment that doesn't need to be as rigorous as say a functional analysis proof (so maybe constrain ourselves to potentials that are at least C2). But after that's accomplished, I definitely wouldn't mind a more advanced discussion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The necessary and sufficient conditions for a potential to generate normalizable solutions are that the potential must be bounded from below, meaning that the potential must have a finite limit as x approaches infinity, and also that the potential must have an upper bound, meaning that the potential must have a finite limit as x approaches negative infinity. In addition, the potential must have properties that allow the wavefunction to fall off to zero at infinity, such as having a non-zero gradient at the boundaries, or having a periodicity that allows it to repeat in a way that it reaches zero at infinity. This is because the integral of the square of the wavefunction must be finite for the wavefunction to be normalizable.
 

Related to Constraints on potential for normalizable wavefunction

1. What is a normalizable wavefunction?

A normalizable wavefunction is a mathematical function that describes the probability amplitude of a quantum system. It must satisfy the condition that its square integral is equal to 1, which means the total probability of finding the system in any state is equal to 1.

2. What are the constraints on potential for a normalizable wavefunction?

The potential for a normalizable wavefunction must satisfy the Schrödinger equation, which is a mathematical equation that describes how the wavefunction evolves over time. Additionally, the potential must also be finite and continuous to ensure the wavefunction is well-defined.

3. Why is it important for a wavefunction to be normalizable?

A normalizable wavefunction ensures that the total probability of finding a quantum system in any state is equal to 1. This is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics and is necessary for the accurate description and prediction of quantum phenomena.

4. How do constraints on potential affect the behavior of a wavefunction?

The constraints on potential determine the allowed energy levels and possible states of a quantum system. A well-behaved potential will result in a stable and normalizable wavefunction, while an ill-behaved potential can lead to unphysical or non-normalizable solutions.

5. Are there any exceptions to the constraints on potential for a normalizable wavefunction?

In certain cases, such as when dealing with boundless systems or infinite potentials, the constraints on potential may be relaxed. However, these exceptions still require careful mathematical treatment to ensure the wavefunction remains normalizable and physically meaningful.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
897
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
849
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
551
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top