Complex representation of wave function

In summary, when solving problems in optics, the wave-function is often represented as a complex number and the real part is taken as the final solution after analysis. This approach is valid and not difficult to verify as long as the evolution equation is linear. When dealing with nonlinear equations, more careful assessment is needed. The complex analysis approach is useful for dealing with cyclic behavior and coordinating dynamic interactions between different aspects of a problem.
  • #1
Runei
193
17
When solving problems, particularly in optics, it is often that we represent the wave-function as a complex number, and then take the real part of it to be the final solution, after we do our analysis.
[tex]u(\vec{r},t)=Re\{U(\vec{r},t)\}=\frac{1}{2}\left(U+U^*\right)[/tex]
Here U is the complex form of the wave function.

What my question is, is whether there exists some analyses regarding the validity of this approach. In general, can we prove that any of the operations we perform in the "complex domain" do not add "extras" to the real function, after we convert back.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Runei said:
What my question is, is whether there exists some analyses regarding the validity of this approach. In general, can we prove that any of the operations we perform in the "complex domain" do not add "extras" to the real function, after we convert back.
Just a short answer for now: I think that, as long as the evolution equation in question is linear, this approach is valid and not difficult to verify. When the quantity evolves in a nonlinear way, more care and case-by-case assessment are needed.
 
  • #3
Runei said:
When solving problems, particularly in optics, it is often that we represent the wave-function as a complex number, and then take the real part of it to be the final solution, after we do our analysis.
[tex]u(\vec{r},t)=Re\{U(\vec{r},t)\}=\frac{1}{2}\left(U+U^*\right)[/tex]
Here U is the complex form of the wave function.

What my question is, is whether there exists some analyses regarding the validity of this approach. In general, can we prove that any of the operations we perform in the "complex domain" do not add "extras" to the real function, after we convert back.
Just the opposite. If the operations add "extras" to the real function, then they belong there and would have been more difficult to keep track of without the complex analysis approach. The complex plane is a very good way of dealing with cyclic behavior. Suppose a problem has cyclical trade-offs between two things. For instance, the trade-off between the potential and kinetic energy of a pendulum. The real and complex parts are a good way of representing the two types of energy and keeping them coordinated in one entity. The operations in complex analysis are designed to allow the study of such dynamic interactions.
 

Related to Complex representation of wave function

1. What is a complex representation of wave function?

A complex representation of wave function is a mathematical representation of a quantum mechanical system that uses complex numbers to describe the amplitude and phase of a wave function. It is used to describe the probability of finding a particle in a specific location or state.

2. How is a complex representation of wave function different from a real representation?

A complex representation of wave function includes both real and imaginary components, while a real representation only includes real numbers. The complex representation allows for a more complete description of a quantum mechanical system, as it takes into account both the magnitude and direction of the wave function.

3. What is the significance of the imaginary component in a complex representation of wave function?

The imaginary component in a complex representation of wave function represents the phase of the wave function. This phase is crucial in determining the interference patterns of quantum particles, which can have both constructive and destructive effects.

4. How is a complex representation of wave function used in quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, the complex representation of wave function is used to calculate the probability of finding a particle in a specific location or state. It is also used to describe the evolution of a quantum system over time and to calculate the expectation values of physical quantities.

5. Are there any limitations to using a complex representation of wave function?

While the complex representation of wave function is a powerful tool in quantum mechanics, it does have some limitations. For example, it can only be used to describe a single particle system and cannot account for interactions between particles. Additionally, it is a purely mathematical concept and does not have a physical interpretation.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
579
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
426
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
13
Views
733
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top