Collection of Lame Jokes

[256bits]

A politician , in front of their Parliament/Congress*:
" Half of you here are idiots"
Others:
" Take that back!!"
PolitIcian:
" Ok, half of you are _not_ idiots".
.

 

[dextercioby]

 

[nsaspook]

 

[WWGD]

 

[WWGD]

 

[dextercioby]

 

[DaveC426913]

This is the opposite of lame. The nuances in this are so clever, I smiled just remembering it and had to (re)post.

 

[berkeman]

 

[WWGD]

In Harvard, even the owls are so educated, they say " whom" instead of "who".

 

[BillTre]

 

[fresh_42]

View attachment 337958

Details, please! Where is that? I try to avoid such places!

 

[DaveC426913]

View attachment 337958

"You may fire when ready."
That's what she said.)

 

[Baluncore]

Details, please! Where is that? I try to avoid such places!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...ing-Death-Star-ripe-avocado-Pokemon-ball.html

 

[dextercioby]

 

[DaveC426913]

View attachment 337970

1024×768? This joke is showing its age!

 

[dextercioby]

The lame factor has to come from somewhere, right?

 

[fresh_42]

Today is 01/01/24 and not as the Americans put it 01/01/24!

 

[fresh_42]

When does a joke become a dad joke?

When it becomes apparent.

 

[fresh_42]

Not a good one, but a really "lame" one:

 

[fresh_42]

 

[256bits]

Not a good one, but a really "lame" one:

View attachment 337988

What does it mean then when I wear "dress pants?"

Just wondering....

 

[jtbell]

Today is 01/01/24 and not as the Americans put it 01/01/24!

I prefer 2024-01-01. Makes it easier to sort dates as text.

 

[BillTre]

I prefer 2024-01-01.

In descending size of time units?

 

[topsquark]

In descending size of time units?

63,872,582,400?

-Dan

 

[jbriggs444]

63,872,582,400?

Did you start counting one year prior to the beginning of the epoch?

 

[jtbell]

In descending size of time units?

Yep. Today is 2024-01-02. Leap Year Day is 2024-02-29.

 

[jtbell]

My only New Year's resolution is to abstain...

...from making New Year's resolutions.(Drat, I've broken it already.)

 

[DaveC426913]

I prefer 2024-01-01. Makes it easier to sort dates as text.

Even better: 02024-01-01.

We all remember the Y2K bug. I'm not getting caught with my pants down again.

 

[fresh_42]

Legend says its home to a quite ferocious beast with big pointy teeth!

 

[phinds]

 

[Borg]

Plus, you get that cool background music.

 

[topsquark]

Even better: 02024-01-01.

We all remember the Y2K bug. I'm not getting caught with my pants down again.

Personally, I'm not planning to be around for that one.

-Dan

 

[BvU]

Personally, I'm not planning to be around for that one.

-Dan

There's another one lurking before then ...

##\ ##

 

[nuuskur]

 

[Halc]

I prefer 2024-01-01

In descending size of time units?

Intel solved this problem by using little-endian protocol (10-10-4202)

Being a Unix/Linux guy, I've always mourned the standardization of the Intel architecture over say 68xxx, but by golly, the Intel guys got the endian thing right. I've tracked down countless bugs due to big-endian confusion.

Of course it doesn't help with trying to sort dates stored in text format since text sorting protocol is big indian, a bug with the dictionary people if you ask me.