Changes in Intro Physics Instruction

In summary: Good. It's about time to improve the quality of Physics education.I've been doing simulations- and activity-based learning in a 101/102 "How Things Work" class, and been taking some data on it: Class structure: 1) My students read and take online quizzes before they come to class.2) In class self-organized groups of 2-4 students complete a typically 4-5 page worksheet that guides them through an experiment (like making and characterizing electromagnets), or an online interactivie simulation (like those on PhET)3) At the beginning of the next class, I discuss briefly (5-10 minutes) about the last activity.
  • #1
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
32,820
4,717
This http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/us/13physics.html?hp" is describing how, at many leading institutions in the US, there are revolutionary changes being made in how introductory physics courses are being taught to students, especially to non-physics majors.

The physics department has replaced the traditional large introductory lecture with smaller classes that emphasize hands-on, interactive, collaborative learning. Last fall, after years of experimentation and debate and resistance from students, who initially petitioned against it, the department made the change permanent. Already, attendance is up and the failure rate has dropped by more than 50 percent.

M.I.T. is not alone. Other universities are changing their ways, among them Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, North Carolina State University, the University of Maryland, the University of Colorado at Boulder and Harvard. In these institutions, physicists have been pioneering teaching methods drawn from research showing that most students learn fundamental concepts more successfully, and are better able to apply them, through interactive, collaborative, student-centered learning.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Good. It's about time to improve the quality of Physics education.
 
  • #3
I've been doing simulations- and activity-based learning in a 101/102 "How Things Work" class, and been taking some data on it:

Class structure:
1) My students read and take online quizzes before they come to class.
2) In class self-organized groups of 2-4 students complete a typically 4-5 page worksheet that guides them through an experiment (like making and characterizing electromagnets), or an online interactivie simulation (like those on PhET)
3) At the beginning of the next class, I discuss briefly (5-10 minutes) about the last activity.
4) I post a review test and generally I find in that day my mini-talks about their questions over the test allow me to discuss about all the key issues I would have wanted to talk about... and I refer to their activities and reading.

Students attitudes about the application of physics to the real world are improved over a typical lecture class (one of the key goals of a "How things Work" class, or even any physics class).The hands-on aspect is important, because this class has no lab. I think students performance is improved or equal (I'm still processing this data).

Note: My work is done in a normal lecture hall (last time I had 120 students.. although the smaller second term 102 class of 45 or so is nicer). The department has a set of ~20 laptops which I use to supplement student laptops. Nothing like MIT's "Workshop Physics" facility (with built in tables and computers and equipment.. and that at other institutions doing this research too.)

If anyone is interested in possiblely extending my PER research to their own institution, I'm happy to share my activities and collaborate on the research techniques, both to improve N and have a different population (I'm at a state flagship university in the SEC). Send me a private message.

I'll be presenting on this in a section of the Denver APS meeting... and probably at least send my undergraduate student with a poster to the AAPT meeting.

I have mixed success with the technique with the calc-based intro courses. It worked great for the third term Optics/Waves/Modern class (I got some of my best teaching reviews!)... but not so great for the second-term EM clas (basically because we don't teach the Mechanics course in our department (it's taught in the college of engineering, and think the course kills students regardless... and students are at least more accustomed to lecture courses). I'd like to modify the activities for algebra-based courses... but I never seem to get those assignments.
 
  • #4
Here's some interesting links:
http://caes.mit.edu/projects/teal/index.html
http://web.mit.edu/jbelcher/www/PhysicsNewsLetter.pdf
(Great visualizations: http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/ )

"Studio Physics" was actually developed at RPI about 15 years ago.
http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/research/educ_physics.html

http://www.physics.ncsu.edu/physics_ed/scaleup.html
http://scaleup.ncsu.edu/In addition to improving how the content gets transferred to students,
there also needs to be improvement on the content itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
This sounds a lot like what the late, great physics educator Arnold B. Arons (one of my personal heroes) was pushing for years ago.
 
  • #6
Here's a possibly http://prst-per.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v5/i1/e010102" that seems to help in getting students to do better in intro physics classes.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to Changes in Intro Physics Instruction

1. How has intro physics instruction changed over the years?

Intro physics instruction has changed significantly over the years, with a shift from traditional lecture-based teaching to more interactive and hands-on methods. This change has been driven by research-based evidence showing that active learning methods are more effective in promoting student understanding and retention of concepts.

2. What are some common changes in teaching methods for intro physics?

Some common changes in teaching methods for intro physics include flipped classrooms, interactive lectures, peer instruction, and group problem-solving activities. These methods encourage students to actively engage with the material, work collaboratively, and apply their knowledge to real-world problems.

3. How have changes in technology affected intro physics instruction?

Advancements in technology have greatly impacted intro physics instruction. Interactive simulations and virtual labs allow students to explore complex concepts in a more engaging and hands-on manner. Online resources also provide additional materials and practice problems for students to supplement their learning.

4. Have changes in intro physics instruction led to improvements in student performance?

Research has shown that active learning methods in intro physics instruction have led to improvements in student performance, with higher grades and increased understanding and retention of concepts. Additionally, these methods have also been shown to reduce achievement gaps among different groups of students.

5. How can instructors effectively implement changes in intro physics instruction?

To effectively implement changes in intro physics instruction, instructors should first familiarize themselves with research-based teaching methods and strategies. They should also seek support from their colleagues and attend professional development workshops. It is also important to regularly assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the changes and make adjustments as needed.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
992
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
115
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
925
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
108
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
375
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
896
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top