Calculating Spacetime Intervals for Simultaneous Events

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of simultaneity and the use of Lorentz transformations to find velocity. The first event is found to have a spacelike invariant interval, leading to a velocity of half the speed of light. The second event is also found to have a spacelike invariant interval, with the same velocity but opposite sign. The third event is found to have a timelike invariant interval, indicating that the velocity cannot be found using the same method as the first two events. Ultimately, it is concluded that no velocity can be found for this third event without violating the speed of light.
  • #1
milkism
118
15
Homework Statement
Analyse of two events with the use of invariant intervals
Relevant Equations
I= -c²t² + d²
Exercise:
7ef83cd9cbe5347d34ec1deb705a93f4.png

My solutions:
  1. For events to be simultaneous, the invariant interval must be bigger than zero (spacelike). I got $$I = -c^2 \Delta t^2 + \Delta x^2 + \Delta y^2 + \Delta z^2 = -(0-1)^2 + (0-2)^2 + (0-0)^2 + (0-0)^2 = -1 + 4 = 3 >0$$. Which is indeed greater than zero, to find the velocity, I will use the first Lorentz-transformation formula with four vectors $$\overline{x}^0 = \gamma \left( x^0 - \beta x^1 \right) = \Delta (c\overline{t}) = \gamma (\Delta (ct) - \beta (\Delta x))$$, we want $$\Delta \overline{t} = 0$$. We get: $$\Delta (ct) = \beta (\Delta x) = \frac{0-1}{0-2} = \frac{v}{c} = v = \frac{c}{2}$$. Where $$\beta = \frac{v}{c}$$.
  2. The new spacetime coordinates for second event will be (-1,2,0,0), the invariant interval doesn't change, meaning it's still spacelike, so the velocity will be the same but opposite sign.
  3. No, for two events to occur at the same point (place) the invariant interval must be negative (timelike), which isn't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
milkism said:
We get: $$\Delta (ct) = \beta (\Delta x) = \frac{0-1}{0-2} = \frac{v}{c} = v = \frac{c}{2}$$. Where $$\beta = \frac{v}{c}$$.
So you're claiming ##\Delta (ct) = \frac{c}{2}## so ##-1 = 1.5\times 10^8~\rm m/s##? Don't use an equal sign to connect steps.

The new spacetime coordinates for second event will be (-1,2,0,0), the invariant interval doesn't change, meaning it's still spacelike, so the velocity will be the same but opposite sign.
You may want to rethink this one.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism, topsquark, MatinSAR and 1 other person
  • #3
vela said:
So you're claiming ##\Delta (ct) = \frac{c}{2}## so ##-1 = 1.5\times 10^8~\rm m/s##? Don't use an equal sign to connect steps.You may want to rethink this one.
Are the spacetime coordinates wrong?
 
  • #4
milkism said:
Are the spacetime coordinates wrong?
##v = \frac c 2## looks right for part (i), but your work seems very muddled to me. For example:

milkism said:
We get: $$\Delta (ct) = \beta (\Delta x) = \frac{0-1}{0-2} = \frac{v}{c} = v = \frac{c}{2}$$.
For part (ii) you need to work things out properly. You've effectively just guessed a (wrong) answer.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism, topsquark and MatinSAR
  • #5
PeroK said:
##v = \frac c 2## looks right for part (i), but your work seems very muddled to me. For example:For part (ii) you need to work things out properly. You've effectively just guessed a (wrong) answer.
Well, I'm lost.
 
  • #6
You know the coordinates in ##S##. Try using your answer ##\beta = -1/2## and the Lorentz transformation and see what you get for the coordinates in the other frame.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism and topsquark
  • #7
milkism said:
Well, I'm lost.
This problem, IMO, is simply asking you to solve an equation for ##v##. Namely:$$\gamma(1 - 2\frac v c)= -1$$
 
  • Like
Likes milkism
  • #8
Haha, I thought we had to do something with invariant intervals for (ii), thanks! Is my solution for (iii) correct?
 
  • #9
milkism said:
Is my solution for (iii) correct?
Yes. Note that you can prove it in this case by showing that no allowable ##v## would solve the relevant equation.
 
  • Like
Likes milkism
  • #10
PeroK said:
Yes. Note that you can prove it in this case by showing that no allowable ##v## would solve the relevant equation.
Because it would be bigger than the speed of light?
 
  • #11
milkism said:
Because it would be bigger than the speed of light?
I don't know. Try it!
 
  • Haha
Likes milkism

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
581
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
808
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
860
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
447
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
765
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
991
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
967
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top