Anyone know who these two people are?

  • Thread starter Locrian
  • Start date
In summary: I think?In summary, Laughlin's book A Different Universe discusses the controversy over superconductivity that occurred in the 1970s. Two highly respected theoretical physicists recorded the contemporary prejudices of their discipline by writing a paper "proving" that superconductivity could never occur at temperatures higher than 30 degrees Kelvin. However, using theoretical results, McMillan and Rowel were able to find empirical values for the electron-phonon coupling constant and "band-structure" density of states for a number of metals and alloys. It is noted that the electron-phonon coupling constant depends primarily on the phonon frequencies rather than on the electronic properties of the metal. Finally, using
  • #1
Locrian
1,881
256
In Laughlin's book A Different Universe he writes:

Back in the 1970's two highly respected theoretical physicists (who will remain unnamed) recorded the contemporary prejudices of their discipline by writing a paper "proving" that superconductivity could never occur at temperatures higher than 30 degrees Kelvin.

Anyone know who these two are? My library searches are all clipped as I move between work and grad school. Given Laughlin's style, I would almost think this a joke and that one of the two is actually him.

Any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I must say I draw a blank with this one. My first instinct was to guess Dave Pines and Bob Schreifer. But I have nothing to back it up.

Zz.
 
  • #3
Yeah, of all the research I've done on this post, I find "scientists believed..." (in reference to the max temp) but no names.

I'll look into this more when I'm in the research library monday.
 
  • #4
Thanks for looking for me. I've still not found much. Here is one article I bumped into following a link you gave, zapperz:

McMillan. "Transition Temperature of Strong-Coupled Superconductors." Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).

The superconducting transition temperature is calculated as a function of the electron-phonon and electron-electron coupling constants within the framework of the strong-coupling theory. Using this theoretical result, we find empirical values of the coupling constants and the "band-structure" density of states for a number of metals and alloys. It is noted that the electron-phonon coupling constant depends primarily on the phonon frequencies rather than on the electronic properties of the metal. Finally, using these results, one can predict a maximum superconducting transition temperature.

But I can't actually pull it up because no library access :(

You know, I gave my notice at my employer something like two and a half months ahead of time. I like to think it was a polite thing to do, but you can bet I'll never do it again. It's taking AGES to get out of here...
 
  • #5
Humm... I never thought of McMillan. But now that you mentioned it, I can certainly see why he would be a candidate. The McMillan-Rowel model is widely used, especially in tunneling spectroscopy, to extract the phonon structure out of the tunneling data of conventional superconductors.

Y'know something, why can't someone just write to Laughlin and ask? He might just answer! :)

Zz.
 
  • #6
From what I've heard Anderson might be the type to write something like that.
 
  • #7
Email sent to his Stanford email addy*. However, the only email I can send from right now is my yahoo mail, so I'm not certain he'll even ever get it. I'll let you know if I get a response.

*Is he back at stanford? I know he left Korea, but that's last I heard...
 
  • #8
He should be at Stanford, or at the very least, able to get any mail sent to him to Stanford.

If you don't hear anything from him, let me know. Maybe if I write from my argonne account, he might give it some attention.

Zz.
 
  • #9
Phil Anderson and Marvin Cohen! I'll find the particular paper and post a reference to it soon.

The source of this information shall just remain a great mystery as all evidence of the transaction has been dutifully burned as requested...

:biggrin:
 
  • #10
Yay, I got one of them.
 
  • #11
I totally forgot to look this up while I was at the library. It's only me and the librarian there today, so I might be occupied, but I'll look into those two authors if I get the chance
 
  • #12
http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=A7222553AH"

This seems to be around the right time with the relevant authors. Their citation names are "ML Cohen" and "PW Anderson"

Superconductivity in d- and f- band metals; Proceedings of the Conference, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y ; United States; 29-30 Oct. 1971. pp. 17-27. 1972

it appears that not a library in Alaska owns it, so I can't pull it to be sure. There's holdings all over the state though, CA, TX, and NY especially.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Pyth, (JFYI) the names Marvin Cohen and Phil Anderson are well-known in the Condensed Matter community. Anderson is possibly among the top 3 or 4 of the most cited authors in all of physics. And Cohen just seems to never slow down...though he must be a million years old by now, at least!
 
  • #14
Gokul43201 said:
Pyth, (JFYI) the names Marvin Cohen and Phil Anderson are well-known in the Condensed Matter community. Anderson is possibly among the top 3 or 4 of the most cited authors in all of physics. And Cohen just seems to never slow down...though he must be a million years old by now, at least!

While I was trying to pin the before-mentioned mistake on them, I couldn't find it, beceause it was swamped with a whole bunch of more recent stuff they've done.

I wasn't aware that anderson was so well established, though.

Our university's part of the 'plasma' and 'geophysica' communities, I wish we had more condensate influence here.
 

Related to Anyone know who these two people are?

1. Who are these two people?

The answer to this question would depend on the context in which the question is being asked. If there is a specific image or video attached, it may be possible to identify the individuals through facial recognition software or by searching for similar images online. If there is no context provided, it may be difficult to determine who the two people are.

2. Can anyone help identify these two people?

This question is similar to the first one and the answer would also depend on the context. It may be helpful to provide more information such as where the image or video was taken, the date, or any other relevant details to aid in identifying the individuals.

3. Why is it important to know who these two people are?

The importance of knowing who these two people are would depend on the reason for asking the question. If it is for personal reasons, such as wanting to reconnect with someone, then the answer would be more subjective. However, if it is for a research or investigative purpose, it may be important to identify the individuals in order to gather more information or evidence.

4. Are there any tools or resources that can help identify these two people?

There are various tools and resources available that can potentially help identify these two people. Facial recognition software, reverse image search engines, and social media platforms are some examples. However, the success of these methods may vary and it may also depend on the amount and quality of information provided.

5. What should I do if I know who these two people are?

If you have information about the identity of these two people, you can reach out to the person who posted the question or share the information with relevant authorities or organizations if it is for a specific purpose. It is always important to respect the privacy of others and obtain their consent before sharing any personal information.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
999
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top