Advantages/disadvantages of penalty formulation for incompressible fluid flow

In summary, the penalty formulation is a method used in fluid flow modeling that eliminates pressure from the momentum equation and allows for a direct calculation of velocity. This is achieved by replacing the continuity equation with a term involving a large coefficient, which can be determined through numerical experimentation. This method may be more suitable for single-phase flow or incompressible fluids, and its advantages include the ability to use explicit schemes and eliminate ellipticity from the equations. However, it may also have some disadvantages compared to other methods, such as the calculation of pressure first.
  • #1
bzz77
34
0
Advantages/disadvantages of "penalty formulation" for incompressible fluid flow

Hi everyone:

I'm interested in getting into some fluid flow modeling (e.g., advection-diffusion). I'm a newbie, so sorry in advance for any silly questions.

Today I came across the "penalty formulation" and I'd really appreciate any basic help or directions to online references in understanding (1) how it works and (2) what the advantages/disadvantages are compared to the method I'm familiar with--using conservation of fluid mass to derive an expression for the fluid pressure p and then getting the velocity profile from that.

From what I've read, using the penalty method allows elimination of pressure from the momentum equation so that the mass and momentum equations can be combined. The result is an equation (convection-diffusion) where velocity can be calculated directly.

This seems rather strange though. The first step in using the penalty method is to replace the continuity equation by:
1/e + grad u

I don't understand what e is/where it comes from. A book I have just calls it a "coefficient with large values." Is it some kind of approximation for P? Is the method I currently use--calculating P first and then getting a velocity profile from that--better?

Could it be that the penalty formulation stuff might be better suited to single-phase flow? Or flows with no gas (compressible)?

I guess what I'm getting at is, what ARE the advantages of the penalty method? I see that someone I respect has used it and I'm wondering why he would have chosen it over the pressure calculation method. Any advice would be very much appreciated. Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2


remove the ellipticity of the equations, thus allowing the use of explicit schemes.
the e is a large number, it takes finite values which can be determined through numerical experimentation.
 

Related to Advantages/disadvantages of penalty formulation for incompressible fluid flow

1. What is penalty formulation for incompressible fluid flow?

Penalty formulation is a numerical method used in computational fluid dynamics to enforce the incompressibility constraint in the Navier-Stokes equations. It involves adding a penalty term to the equations to penalize any violation of incompressibility and ensure that the fluid remains incompressible.

2. What are the advantages of penalty formulation?

One of the main advantages of penalty formulation is its simplicity. It is relatively easy to implement and does not require complex algorithms or data structures. Additionally, it is an efficient method for enforcing incompressibility in simulations of fluid flow.

3. What are the disadvantages of penalty formulation?

One of the main disadvantages of penalty formulation is that it can introduce numerical instabilities in certain cases. This can lead to inaccurate results and may require additional measures to stabilize the simulation. Additionally, the choice of penalty parameter can significantly impact the accuracy and convergence of the solution.

4. How does penalty formulation compare to other methods for incompressible fluid flow?

Compared to other methods such as projection methods or penalty-projection methods, penalty formulation is generally simpler to implement and computationally more efficient. However, it may not be as accurate or stable in certain cases, and the choice of penalty parameter can be critical for obtaining reliable results.

5. Are there any limitations to penalty formulation?

Yes, there are some limitations to penalty formulation. It is mainly suitable for incompressible flows and may not be applicable to compressible flows. It also requires a relatively fine grid resolution to accurately capture the fluid dynamics, which can increase computation time and resources. Additionally, the effectiveness of penalty formulation may vary depending on the geometry and boundary conditions of the simulation.

Similar threads

Question about fluid flowing into branching pipes
    • General Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Flow rate of fluid at a burst leakage in a pipeline due to over pressurization
    • General Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
How Do You Calculate the Flow Rate of Oxygen in a Pressurized System?
    • General Engineering
Replies
13
Views
2K
A Why are the Navier-Stokes equations inconsistent in this case?
    • Classical Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
Fluid Flow Equations With Real Values
    • General Engineering
Replies
20
Views
2K
Pressure profile of a gas flow through an orifice
    • General Engineering
Replies
10
Views
4K
Volumetric flow rate of nitrogen through relieving pressure regulator
    • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
How to find velocity of gas pump flowing into car tank
    • General Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
Comparetto type Air Cleaner/Filter: What causes its increased airflow?
    • General Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
I About Bernoulli's equation for fluid flow
    • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top