3D Rectangular Scattering Potential

In summary, the problem involves particles with a small potential scattering off a scatterer with a larger potential. The Born approximation can be used in this case, but using spherical coordinates may give a simpler solution. The second part of the problem involves a different approach, as the incident wave vector is parallel to the z-axis.
  • #1
qmphysics
1
0

Homework Statement



There is a constant potential, V0, in the region -a<x<a, -a<y<a, -b<z<b, and V=0 otherwise. Particles of mass m are incident on the scatterer with wave vector k in the x direction with a flux at the origin of one particle per second per cm^2. There is a detector with cross-sectional area A is located at a large distance R from the origin, in the direction with polar coordinates (theta, phi). Assumptions: a<<b, k*a<<1, V0<<hbar^2/(m*b^2), k*b not necessarily small. We want to find the counting rate in the detector. The problem also asks how the answer would change if the k vector was parallel to z instead.

Homework Equations



It seems that due to the small potential, we can use the Born approximation, which gives the scattering amplitude [itex]f(k\prime,k)=-\frac{m}{2 \pi \hbar^2}\int exp(i (k-k\prime)\cdot r\prime) V(r\prime) d^{3}r\prime)[/itex].


The Attempt at a Solution



In spherical coordinates, the Born approximation isn't bad to calculate. However, in this rectangular case, I can't get a nice looking result out of the integration above. I'm interested to see if anyone thinks there is a different way to do the problem, or if I should just keep trying the integral. As for the second part of the problem, it doesn't seem like the Born approximation would necessarily hold when the particle sees a longer range potential. But hopefully this part will become more clear when I can figure out the first part.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for your post. You are correct in using the Born approximation for this problem, as the potential is small and the incident wave vector is small compared to the size of the scatterer. However, in this case, using rectangular coordinates may not yield a simple solution for the integral. You may want to try using spherical coordinates instead, as the potential is spherically symmetric. This may give you a simpler expression for the scattering amplitude, which can then be used to calculate the counting rate at the detector.

As for the second part of the problem, you are correct in thinking that the Born approximation may not hold when the incident wave vector is parallel to the z-axis. In this case, the potential will have a larger effect on the scattering and a different approach may be needed. You may want to consider using the full Schrödinger equation to solve for the scattering amplitude in this case.

I hope this helps and good luck with your calculations! If you need any further assistance, please don't hesitate to ask. As scientists, we are always here to help and support each other in our research and problem-solving.
 

Related to 3D Rectangular Scattering Potential

1. What is a 3D Rectangular Scattering Potential?

A 3D rectangular scattering potential is a mathematical model used in quantum mechanics to describe the interaction between a particle and a potential energy field in a three-dimensional space. It is typically represented by a rectangular box with defined dimensions and potential energy values at each point within the box.

2. How is a 3D Rectangular Scattering Potential used in research?

Scientists use 3D rectangular scattering potentials in research to study the behavior of particles in various potential energy fields. This can help in understanding how particles interact with different structures and materials, which has applications in fields such as materials science, nanotechnology, and quantum computing.

3. What factors influence the behavior of particles in a 3D Rectangular Scattering Potential?

The behavior of particles in a 3D rectangular scattering potential is influenced by several factors, including the shape and dimensions of the potential, the potential energy values at each point within the box, and the properties of the particles themselves (such as their mass and charge).

4. How is a 3D Rectangular Scattering Potential different from other potential energy models?

One key difference between a 3D rectangular scattering potential and other potential energy models is its simplicity. The rectangular shape and defined potential energy values make it easier to solve and analyze compared to more complex potential models. Additionally, it is versatile and can be used to model a wide range of potential energy fields.

5. What are some practical applications of understanding 3D Rectangular Scattering Potentials?

Understanding 3D rectangular scattering potentials has many practical applications. For example, it can help in the development of new materials with specific properties, design of nanoscale devices, and development of quantum algorithms for computing. It can also aid in the study of fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and particle behavior.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
747
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
837
Replies
4
Views
561
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top