What Would Happen to Electromagnetic Force in 4D?

• Apr 2, 2004

• #1

kuengb

106

0

I hope my question makes some sense; if not, just post an "evil smiley" and ignore it

So, my only "knowledge" about this is based on one of Hawking's books, wherein it is written: If space had four dimensions instead of three, gravitation would behave differently (I think it was [tex]1/{r^3} [/tex]), so that there wouldn't be any stable planet orbits any more.

Now, what would happen to the electromagnetic force? My particular worry is the Lorentz force: If there is an analogon in four dimensions, what would it's direction be? Because, in 3D it is perpendicular to velocity and field vector, but in four dimensions this is ambiguous.

Would there possibly even be more than two aspects of the electromagnetic force? Hm?

 

Physics news on Phys.org

• IRIS beamline at BESSY II gets a new nanospectroscopy end station
• First experimental proof for brain-like computer with water and salt
• Airborne single-photon lidar system achieves high-resolution 3D imaging

• Apr 3, 2004

• #2

ranyart

370

0

kuengb said:

I hope my question makes some sense; if not, just post an "evil smiley" and ignore it

So, my only "knowledge" about this is based on one of Hawking's books, wherein it is written: If space had four dimensions instead of three, gravitation would behave differently (I think it was [tex]1/{r^3} [/tex]), so that there wouldn't be any stable planet orbits any more.

Now, what would happen to the electromagnetic force? My particular worry is the Lorentz force: If there is an analogon in four dimensions, what would it's direction be? Because, in 3D it is perpendicular to velocity and field vector, but in four dimensions this is ambiguous.

Would there possibly even be more than two aspects of the electromagnetic force? Hm?

Here is something for you to ponder?

In 3+1 dimensions (spacetime) the EM wave propergates along by Photons, which are visible as they bounce around in 3+1 spacetime.

In 2+1 dimensions (EM-Field) the Photon does not exist, or technically cannot be observed, but here lays the Force-Carrier replacing Photons.

In 1+1 dimensions (<->)(>-<) there is separation of EM into base quantities, or SINGULAR Electro component and Magnetic component, with the corresponding energies being expansive or contractive..Negative and Positive.

Ive left out a little major detail!

Just as photons cannot be observed in lesser dimensional space, they can never transform into higher dimensional arena's, and still be called Photons?..for 3+1 spacetime..the buck stops with Photons.

 

• Apr 3, 2004

• #3

Janitor

Science Advisor

1,109

1

This falls far short of answering your question, but...

In 3+1 spacetime, the Faraday tensor field for electromagnetism has (because it is rank-2 and antisymmetric) 3+2+1=6 independent components, which are numbers to be specified at each point in spacetime to characterize the e.m. field. Historically, before this tensor was conceived, physicists considered an e.m. field to be due to two fields, each with 3 components. The E field lived in 3D space and was a polar vector, while the B (or H) field also lived in 3D space and was an axial vector, or "pseudovector."

Presumably in a space with a different number N of space dimensions, intelligent beings would have needed to find the (N+1)x(N+1) tensor right off the bat, instead of limping by with a vector field plus a pseudovector field.

 

Last edited: Apr 3, 2004

• Apr 3, 2004

• #4

selfAdjoint

Staff Emeritus

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

6,894

11

In our history, it was EM that drove relativity, and relativity that called up 3+1 geometry. But this is contingent, it might have been a different order. Parmenides and St. Augustine all but saw four dimensional reality, and we could make up an alternate history in which 3+1 geometry came to be, and drove physics, so EM was discovered in antiquity (they already knew both static electricity and magnetism).

 

• Apr 3, 2004

• #5

Janitor

Science Advisor

1,109

1

Years ago I saw a semi-serious article somewhere, called "Could Newton have discovered relativity?"--and they meant Einstein/Lorentz relativity, not Galilean. I can't remember exactly what the author's point of view on it was, but he did quote some speculative parts of Newton's body of writing that at least suggested an anticipation of relativity of a sort, even though being written before electromagnetic theory was developed.

Ummm... This also brings to mind an article I read in an aviation magazine in my teens. It was on the topic of whether today's typical private pilot could have been an Ace in the first World War if he could travel back in time to that period with his Cessna 150, modified to carry a machine gun.

 

Last edited: Apr 3, 2004

• Apr 4, 2004

• #6

selfAdjoint

Staff Emeritus

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

6,894

11

I wonder if the Cessna's modern engine could run on the crude gas of the time? I have no real idea, it was just the thought that came up.

I'm going to see if I can find that Newton relativity article.

 

• Apr 4, 2004

• #7

Janitor

Science Advisor

1,109

1

We will let him carry a storage tank of avgas back in time as well. I believe the author concluded that the 150 would have been dominant early in the war, but it would have been in over its head by the end of the war.

The other item I mentioned may even have been a chapter in some book at the library, I'm not sure.

 

1. What is electromagnetic force in 4D?

Electromagnetic force in 4D is the combination of electric and magnetic forces that act on charged particles in a four-dimensional space. This force is responsible for interactions between charged particles and is one of the four fundamental forces in nature.

2. How does electromagnetic force in 4D differ from 3D?

In 4D, the electromagnetic force is described by a four-dimensional vector field, whereas in 3D it is described by a three-dimensional vector field. Additionally, in 4D there are more possible ways for the force to act on particles due to the additional dimension.

3. What is the role of electromagnetic force in 4D in the universe?

Electromagnetic force in 4D plays a crucial role in the universe by governing the interactions between charged particles. This force is responsible for phenomena such as electricity, magnetism, and light, and is essential for the formation and functioning of atoms, molecules, and larger structures in the universe.

4. How does the strength of electromagnetic force in 4D compare to other fundamental forces?

Electromagnetic force in 4D is one of the strongest fundamental forces, second only to the strong nuclear force. It is significantly stronger than the weak nuclear force and gravity.

5. Can electromagnetic force in 4D be manipulated or controlled?

Yes, electromagnetic force in 4D can be manipulated and controlled through various methods such as applying electric or magnetic fields, using electromagnetic radiation, and using charged particles to interact with the force. This manipulation and control of electromagnetic force is the basis for many technologies, including electricity, electronics, and telecommunications.