Is X in Complementary Logic a Model of Itself?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of Complementary Logic, which is a transitional logic between Boolean and Non-Boolean Logic. It distinguishes between potential and actual infinity and avoids Russell's paradox. The speaker's website provides more information on the topic. The conversation also briefly touches on a potential interpretation of "x" in the paper as "A Model."
  • #1
Organic
1,224
0
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
sorry but i don't have time to read your article, but i want to know how does your c. logic differ from our known logic tools?
 
  • #3
Hi loop quantum gravity,


Thank you for your reply.


Complementary Logic is a fading transition between Boolean Logic (0 XOR 1) and Non-Boolean Logic (0 AND 1).

Multiplication and addition are complementary concepts.

Also multiplication is noncummotative (a*b not= b*a).


Complementary Logic clearly distinguish between two types of infinity:

1) Potential infinity.

2) Actual infinity.


Russell's paradox is naturally avoided.

There is a general definition to the question: "What is a NUMBER?"


More can be added to the above, so if you want to know more please read it in my website:

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/CATpage.html


Yours,

Organic
 
Last edited:
  • #4
What if the x in the paper stands for "A Model"?

Then a model of x is x itself.

I'm just messing with you
 

What is "The major theorem"?

"The major theorem" is a mathematical concept that states a fundamental result in a particular field of study. It is often considered to be a key idea or principle that is used to solve problems and advance understanding in that field.

Who discovered "The major theorem"?

The specific origin of "The major theorem" may vary depending on the field of study in which it is used. Some major theorems have been discovered by a single scientist, while others have been developed over time by multiple researchers.

How is "The major theorem" used in scientific research?

"The major theorem" is used in scientific research as a tool to help explain complex phenomena and make predictions about the natural world. It is often used as a starting point for further investigation and experimentation.

What makes "The major theorem" significant?

"The major theorem" is significant because it represents a major breakthrough or advancement in a particular field of study. It often provides a key insight or understanding that was previously unknown, and can have a significant impact on future research and developments.

Can "The major theorem" be proven?

Whether or not "The major theorem" can be proven depends on the specific theorem in question. Some major theorems have been proven to be true, while others remain unproven or have been proven to be false. The proof of a major theorem is often a significant achievement in itself and can lead to further advancements in the field.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
74
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
7
Replies
226
Views
18K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top